Design, construction, furnishing, and rental of a modular kindergarten at Kose tee 58, Tallinn
ClosedKey facts
- Buyer
- Tallinna Haridusamet
- Estimated value
- €1,200,000
- Deadline
- Expired
- CPV Code
- 45210000-2 — Building construction work
- Procedure
- Open procedure
Original Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
2 requirements across 1 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
6 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the conditions and exclusion grounds for first-tier subcontractors during the contract performance phase, focusing on criminal offenses such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, and requires the tenderer to provide answers regarding these.
This document outlines the compliance conditions for the tender for the design, construction, furnishing, and rental of a modular kindergarten, including tender submission rules, requirements for furnishing and cost presentation, qualifications of required specialists, and MTR registration.
This document is a furniture specification for a 4-group modular kindergarten, requiring bidders to complete the table with details of their proposed products, including wardrobes, shelves, and cabinets.
When evaluating bids, the total cost of the bid is the sole criterion, with the lowest value bid receiving the maximum number of points.
This document is an explanatory ESPD detailing the contracting authority's stipulated exclusion grounds and qualification conditions that bidders must meet and declare electronically.
No summary available for this document.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender is generally well-structured with clear requirements and transparent evaluation criteria. Key areas for improvement include minor data completeness issues and a limited focus on broader sustainability aspects.
Score Breakdown
Deadlines are reasonable, the CPV code is appropriate, and the tender references national law for the justification of not dividing into lots. Mandatory exclusion grounds are present. Minor issues include 'N/A' for procedure type codes and a slight initial ambiguity in the evaluation criteria description, though clarified in a document.
The project description is very clear and unambiguous. Key requirements and evaluation criteria are specified in the documents, with Document 2 clarifying that the total cost is the sole criterion, resolving an initial discrepancy with the 'relative_weighting' characteristic.
Most essential information (title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, duration, location) is present. Key documents outlining requirements and criteria are attached. However, two documents (XML, ASICE) were not analyzed by AI, potentially obscuring some details, and Type/Procedure codes are 'N/A'.
The tender value is disclosed, deadlines are reasonable, and evaluation criteria (lowest price) are objective and transparent. E-procurement is enabled for equal access. The decision not to divide into lots is justified by national law (RHS § 27 lg 2), which, while potentially limiting for smaller specialized firms, does not appear tailored to a specific company.
Electronic submission is supported, and a platform URL is provided. Contract duration is clearly specified. However, the exact contract start date is not explicitly stated, which could be a minor practical detail for bidders.
Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no detected disputes or suspensions. The minor inconsistency between 'relative_weighting' and 'sole criterion' is clarified within the documents, maintaining overall consistency.
The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks explicit social criteria and innovation focus, as flagged by automated checks, limiting its overall sustainability scope. It is not EU funded.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required