Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of computer equipment

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307814
Value
€31,630
Location
Estonia
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Offer cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€31,630
Duration
3 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€87,029
Avg. Bids
2.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
388 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of computers and computer accessories for Saku Gymnasium and Saku Municipality Government.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender is a price-driven procurement for standard computer equipment. Success hinges on submitting the absolute lowest compliant price. While social value and innovation are absent, demonstrating exceptional value through efficient delivery and robust warranty support can provide a competitive edge.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Price, Guaranteed Compliance

Reliable Delivery, Seamless Execution

Key Opportunities
Dominance in Price-Based Evaluation
Leveraging Existing Supplier Agreements for Cost Savings
Streamlined Submission Process
Key Challenges
Intense Price Competition

Focus on aggressive pricing by leveraging bulk purchasing power, optimizing internal cost structures, and minimizing overhead in the bid. Explore any available supplier rebates or volume discounts.

Ensuring Absolute Compliance with Technical Specifications

Thoroughly review 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus' and cross-reference with product datasheets. If any potential equivalency is needed, prepare a clear and concise explanation as per eligibility requirements.

Potential for Errors in Hankepass Submission

Dedicate a skilled resource to accurately complete the Hankepass electronically. Conduct a thorough review by a second person before submission to catch any potential mistakes.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established IT reseller or distributor with strong supplier relationships, efficient logistics, and a proven track record of delivering IT hardware within tight deadlines. They should have a streamlined quoting process and the ability to offer highly competitive pricing on bulk computer equipment and accessories.
Key Requirements
Lowest Offer Cost
Compliance with Technical Specifications (Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus)
Submission via Hankepass (ESPD)
Adherence to Contract Project Terms (Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt)
Delivery within 3 months
Key Discriminators
The absolute lowest compliant price.
Exceptional warranty terms offered beyond the minimum requirement.
Demonstrated ability to deliver ahead of the 3-month deadline.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a subtle mention of local employment if applicable to your operations or a commitment to responsible e-waste disposal, framed as a standard operational practice rather than a specific bid commitment.
Bid Focus Areas
Offer Cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price. This requires meticulous cost analysis, leveraging supplier discounts, and minimizing all non-essential bid costs. Ensure the price is presented in the prescribed format with all required details (product name, brand, model, quantity, unit price, total cost).

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price to Win
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weightage on cost, the primary focus must be on submitting the absolute lowest compliant price. This involves detailed cost breakdown, leveraging bulk purchasing power, and exploring all possible supplier discounts and rebates. Ensure the pricing is accurate and presented in the required format.

Directly determines the bid's score and likelihood of winning.
Meticulously Comply with Technical Specifications
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly review 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus' to ensure every specification is met. Document product compliance clearly. If any product is an 'equivalent', prepare a strong justification for its suitability as per eligibility requirements.

Ensures the bid is not disqualified on technical grounds.
Flawless Hankepass (ESPD) Submission
CriticalMed effort

Accurately and completely fill out the Hankepass electronically. Double-check all fields for accuracy and ensure all required confirmations are made. A single error can lead to disqualification.

Essential for bid eligibility.
Optimize Delivery Logistics
HighLow effort

While not a primary evaluation criterion, efficient and timely delivery within the 3-month timeframe is crucial. Highlight your logistical capabilities and any potential for earlier delivery if feasible, as this can be a subtle differentiator.

Reduces risk of non-compliance and can be a minor positive differentiator.
Offer Enhanced Warranty Support
MediumLow effort

If possible, offer a warranty period or service level agreement that exceeds the minimum specified in 'Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt'. This can be a low-cost differentiator that appeals to the contracting authority's long-term needs, even if not directly scored.

Provides a competitive edge beyond price.
Clarify Ambiguities Early
HighLow effort

If any part of the technical specifications or contract terms is unclear, utilize the simplified procurement procedure's clarification process ('Lihthankemenetluse kord') to seek information. This prevents misinterpretations and potential bid errors.

Prevents disqualification due to misunderstanding.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective and reliable supplier for standard IT hardware. Emphasize the ability to meet all technical requirements precisely and deliver within the specified timeframe, backed by a streamlined and error-free submission process.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (2)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--The tender is for the purchase of computer equipment.
--The duration of the contract is 3 months.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-01 06:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm their offer meets the tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit the offer cost in the prescribed forms.
--Bidders must explain equivalency if necessary.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is for the purchase of computer equipment for Saku Gymnasium and Saku Municipality.
--Specific technical specifications, quantities, and warranty requirements for the computer equipment are detailed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The total value of the tender is 31630.0 EUR.
--The tender evaluation will be primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--Offer cost must be submitted in the prescribed forms.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307814_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.9 KB

Bidders must confirm their offer meets tender conditions, submit the bid price in specified formats, and explain equivalency if necessary.

Vorm 1 Pakkumuse maksumuse esildis.XLS
Vorm_1_Pakkumuse maksumuse esildis.xlsx -- 11.6 KB

The contracting authority requires a bid cost submission for the purchase of computer equipment, specifying product name, brand, model, quantity, unit price, and total cost.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307814_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids for the purchase of computer equipment primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307814_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 39.2 KB

The procurement pass is an initial proof of the company's qualification and compliance with tender conditions, which must be completed electronically.

Lihthankemenetluse kordPDF
Lihthankemenetluse kord.pdf -- 108.0 KB

This document outlines the simplified procurement procedure for the purchase of computer equipment for Saku Municipality, including bid submission requirements and the process for requesting clarifications.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 230.3 KB

The contracting authority is seeking computer equipment for Saku Gymnasium and Saku Municipal Government, specifying technical descriptions, quantities, and warranty requirements.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektPDF
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt.pdf -- 119.0 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the terms for the purchase of computer equipment, including delivery conditions, payment procedures, and warranties.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for computer equipment is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process, though it lacks specific sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope, and the procedure (LM) is indicated. CPV code is provided. No disputes are noted. The financing condition is linked to an attached project, which is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, specifying the items and beneficiaries. Requirements are documented through various attached documents (Hankepass, Vastavustingimused, Tehniline kirjeldus, Vorm 1). Evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting' and further detailed in a document, indicating a clear, albeit cost-focused, approach.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration (3 months), and tender validity. Key documents like technical specifications and submission forms are attached. However, the 'Value Classified' status without further explanation might leave some ambiguity for bidders.

Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation is primarily cost-based, which is objective. Access to documents is implied through the tender platform. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are confirmed. A contract start date is not explicitly stated, but the contract duration is defined. Financing information is linked to an attached project. The short contract duration (3 months) might be a practical consideration for the scope.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically sequenced (Reveal, Submission, Opening).

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear description and objective evaluation criteria (cost-based).
Use of e-procurement and e-submission.
Well-defined technical specifications and submission forms.
Logical and consistent data presentation.

Concerns

Limited sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Ambiguity regarding 'Value Classified' status.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, recyclability) into evaluation.
2. Clarify the 'Value Classified' status or provide further details if applicable.
3. Explicitly state the contract start date or a mechanism for its determination.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline