Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Køb af computerudstyr

Åben
Frist
2 dage tilbage
April 06, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Leverancer
Reference
307814
Værdi
€31,630
Lokation
Estonia, Estland
Udgivet
Marts 19, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
Offer cost100%
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 19, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Marts 30, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 06, 2026

Åbning af udbud

April 01, 2026

VinderchancePRO
🔒
Opgrader til Professional
Se din estimerede vinderchance baseret på historiske data.
Opgrader til Professionel →
OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
SektorsindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for sektorsindsigt
Se gennemsnitlige vinderpriser, konkurrenceniveauer og markedstrends.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
€31,630
Varighed
3 måneder
Lokation
Estonia
Type
Leverancer
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gns. Vindende Pris
€87,029
Gns. Tilbud
2.9
Konkurrence
Lav
SMV Vindere
96%
388 udbud analyseret

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Køb af computere og computertilbehør til Saku Gymnasium og Saku Kommuneadministrationen.
Elektronisk Afsendelse

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

AI-drevet analyse af dette udbuds krav, muligheder og udfordringer. Få strategiske indsigter for at maksimere din vinderchance.

75%
Estimeret vinderchanceModerat match

This tender is a price-driven procurement for standard computer equipment. Success hinges on submitting the absolute lowest compliant price. While social value and innovation are absent, demonstrating exceptional value through efficient delivery and robust warranty support can provide a competitive edge.

Nøglebudskaber til at vinde

Unbeatable Price, Guaranteed Compliance

Reliable Delivery, Seamless Execution

Nøglemuligheder
Dominance in Price-Based Evaluation
Leveraging Existing Supplier Agreements for Cost Savings
Streamlined Submission Process
Nøgleudfordringer
Intense Price Competition

Focus on aggressive pricing by leveraging bulk purchasing power, optimizing internal cost structures, and minimizing overhead in the bid. Explore any available supplier rebates or volume discounts.

Ensuring Absolute Compliance with Technical Specifications

Thoroughly review 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus' and cross-reference with product datasheets. If any potential equivalency is needed, prepare a clear and concise explanation as per eligibility requirements.

Potential for Errors in Hankepass Submission

Dedicate a skilled resource to accurately complete the Hankepass electronically. Conduct a thorough review by a second person before submission to catch any potential mistakes.

Ideel tilbudsgiverprofil
A well-established IT reseller or distributor with strong supplier relationships, efficient logistics, and a proven track record of delivering IT hardware within tight deadlines. They should have a streamlined quoting process and the ability to offer highly competitive pricing on bulk computer equipment and accessories.
Nøglekrav
Lowest Offer Cost
Compliance with Technical Specifications (Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus)
Submission via Hankepass (ESPD)
Adherence to Contract Project Terms (Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt)
Delivery within 3 months
Nøgledifferentiatorer
The absolute lowest compliant price.
Exceptional warranty terms offered beyond the minimum requirement.
Demonstrated ability to deliver ahead of the 3-month deadline.
Muligheder for social værdi
While not explicitly required, consider a subtle mention of local employment if applicable to your operations or a commitment to responsible e-waste disposal, framed as a standard operational practice rather than a specific bid commitment.
Fokusområder for tilbud
Offer Cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price. This requires meticulous cost analysis, leveraging supplier discounts, and minimizing all non-essential bid costs. Ensure the price is presented in the prescribed format with all required details (product name, brand, model, quantity, unit price, total cost).

Anbefalinger6
Aggressively Price to Win
KritiskHøj indsats

Given the 100% weightage on cost, the primary focus must be on submitting the absolute lowest compliant price. This involves detailed cost breakdown, leveraging bulk purchasing power, and exploring all possible supplier discounts and rebates. Ensure the pricing is accurate and presented in the required format.

Directly determines the bid's score and likelihood of winning.
Meticulously Comply with Technical Specifications
KritiskMedium indsats

Thoroughly review 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus' to ensure every specification is met. Document product compliance clearly. If any product is an 'equivalent', prepare a strong justification for its suitability as per eligibility requirements.

Ensures the bid is not disqualified on technical grounds.
Flawless Hankepass (ESPD) Submission
KritiskMedium indsats

Accurately and completely fill out the Hankepass electronically. Double-check all fields for accuracy and ensure all required confirmations are made. A single error can lead to disqualification.

Essential for bid eligibility.
Optimize Delivery Logistics
HøjLav indsats

While not a primary evaluation criterion, efficient and timely delivery within the 3-month timeframe is crucial. Highlight your logistical capabilities and any potential for earlier delivery if feasible, as this can be a subtle differentiator.

Reduces risk of non-compliance and can be a minor positive differentiator.
Offer Enhanced Warranty Support
MediumLav indsats

If possible, offer a warranty period or service level agreement that exceeds the minimum specified in 'Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt'. This can be a low-cost differentiator that appeals to the contracting authority's long-term needs, even if not directly scored.

Provides a competitive edge beyond price.
Clarify Ambiguities Early
HøjLav indsats

If any part of the technical specifications or contract terms is unclear, utilize the simplified procurement procedure's clarification process ('Lihthankemenetluse kord') to seek information. This prevents misinterpretations and potential bid errors.

Prevents disqualification due to misunderstanding.
Konkurrencemæssig positionering
Position as the most cost-effective and reliable supplier for standard IT hardware. Emphasize the ability to meet all technical requirements precisely and deliver within the specified timeframe, backed by a streamlined and error-free submission process.

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

17 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (7)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (4)
Teknisk (2)
Finansiel (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--The tender is for the purchase of computer equipment.
--The duration of the contract is 3 months.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-01 06:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm their offer meets the tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit the offer cost in the prescribed forms.
--Bidders must explain equivalency if necessary.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is for the purchase of computer equipment for Saku Gymnasium and Saku Municipality.
--Specific technical specifications, quantities, and warranty requirements for the computer equipment are detailed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The total value of the tender is 31630.0 EUR.
--The tender evaluation will be primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--Offer cost must be submitted in the prescribed forms.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

7 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

VastavustingimusedPDF
307814_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.9 KB

Bidders must confirm their offer meets tender conditions, submit the bid price in specified formats, and explain equivalency if necessary.

Vis
Vorm 1 Pakkumuse maksumuse esildis.XLS
Vorm_1_Pakkumuse maksumuse esildis.xlsx -- 11.6 KB

The contracting authority requires a bid cost submission for the purchase of computer equipment, specifying product name, brand, model, quantity, unit price, and total cost.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307814_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids for the purchase of computer equipment primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Vis
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307814_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 39.2 KB

The procurement pass is an initial proof of the company's qualification and compliance with tender conditions, which must be completed electronically.

Vis
Lihthankemenetluse kordPDF
Lihthankemenetluse kord.pdf -- 108.0 KB

This document outlines the simplified procurement procedure for the purchase of computer equipment for Saku Municipality, including bid submission requirements and the process for requesting clarifications.

Vis
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 230.3 KB

The contracting authority is seeking computer equipment for Saku Gymnasium and Saku Municipal Government, specifying technical descriptions, quantities, and warranty requirements.

Vis
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektPDF
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt.pdf -- 119.0 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the terms for the purchase of computer equipment, including delivery conditions, payment procedures, and warranties.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for computer equipment is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process, though it lacks specific sustainability considerations.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope, and the procedure (LM) is indicated. CPV code is provided. No disputes are noted. The financing condition is linked to an attached project, which is standard.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, specifying the items and beneficiaries. Requirements are documented through various attached documents (Hankepass, Vastavustingimused, Tehniline kirjeldus, Vorm 1). Evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting' and further detailed in a document, indicating a clear, albeit cost-focused, approach.

Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration (3 months), and tender validity. Key documents like technical specifications and submission forms are attached. However, the 'Value Classified' status without further explanation might leave some ambiguity for bidders.

Retfærdighed85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation is primarily cost-based, which is objective. Access to documents is implied through the tender platform. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are confirmed. A contract start date is not explicitly stated, but the contract duration is defined. Financing information is linked to an attached project. The short contract duration (3 months) might be a practical consideration for the scope.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically sequenced (Reveal, Submission, Opening).

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Styrker

Clear description and objective evaluation criteria (cost-based).
Use of e-procurement and e-submission.
Well-defined technical specifications and submission forms.
Logical and consistent data presentation.

Bekymringer

Limited sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Ambiguity regarding 'Value Classified' status.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Anbefalinger

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, recyclability) into evaluation.
2. Clarify the 'Value Classified' status or provide further details if applicable.
3. Explicitly state the contract start date or a mechanism for its determination.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline