Tarvitsetko tarjousasiantuntijan apua? Katso tarjousten valmistelupalvelumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Purchase of computer equipment

Suljettu

Jättömääräaika on umpeutunut

Tämän tarjouskilpailun jättömääräaika on umpeutunut, eikä se enää ota vastaan hakemuksia. Alla olevat tiedot säilytetään viitteellisinä.

Selaa aktiivisia tarjouskilpailuja
Määräaika
Päättynyt
6. huhtikuuta 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Tarvikkeet
Viite
307814
Arvo
€31,630
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
19. maaliskuuta 2026
Organisaatio
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Offer cost100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

19. maaliskuuta 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

30. maaliskuuta 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

6. huhtikuuta 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

1. huhtikuuta 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€31,630
Kesto
3 kuukautta
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Tarvikkeet
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€87,029
Keskim. tarjoukset
2.9
Kilpailu
Matala
PK-yritys voittajat
96%
388 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Purchase of computers and computer accessories for Saku Gymnasium and Saku Municipality Government.
Sähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

75%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender is a price-driven procurement for standard computer equipment. Success hinges on submitting the absolute lowest compliant price. While social value and innovation are absent, demonstrating exceptional value through efficient delivery and robust warranty support can provide a competitive edge.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Unbeatable Price, Guaranteed Compliance

Reliable Delivery, Seamless Execution

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Dominance in Price-Based Evaluation
Leveraging Existing Supplier Agreements for Cost Savings
Streamlined Submission Process
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense Price Competition

Focus on aggressive pricing by leveraging bulk purchasing power, optimizing internal cost structures, and minimizing overhead in the bid. Explore any available supplier rebates or volume discounts.

Ensuring Absolute Compliance with Technical Specifications

Thoroughly review 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus' and cross-reference with product datasheets. If any potential equivalency is needed, prepare a clear and concise explanation as per eligibility requirements.

Potential for Errors in Hankepass Submission

Dedicate a skilled resource to accurately complete the Hankepass electronically. Conduct a thorough review by a second person before submission to catch any potential mistakes.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A well-established IT reseller or distributor with strong supplier relationships, efficient logistics, and a proven track record of delivering IT hardware within tight deadlines. They should have a streamlined quoting process and the ability to offer highly competitive pricing on bulk computer equipment and accessories.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Lowest Offer Cost
Compliance with Technical Specifications (Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus)
Submission via Hankepass (ESPD)
Adherence to Contract Project Terms (Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt)
Delivery within 3 months
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
The absolute lowest compliant price.
Exceptional warranty terms offered beyond the minimum requirement.
Demonstrated ability to deliver ahead of the 3-month deadline.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly required, consider a subtle mention of local employment if applicable to your operations or a commitment to responsible e-waste disposal, framed as a standard operational practice rather than a specific bid commitment.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Offer Cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price. This requires meticulous cost analysis, leveraging supplier discounts, and minimizing all non-essential bid costs. Ensure the price is presented in the prescribed format with all required details (product name, brand, model, quantity, unit price, total cost).

Suositukset6
Aggressively Price to Win
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the 100% weightage on cost, the primary focus must be on submitting the absolute lowest compliant price. This involves detailed cost breakdown, leveraging bulk purchasing power, and exploring all possible supplier discounts and rebates. Ensure the pricing is accurate and presented in the required format.

Directly determines the bid's score and likelihood of winning.
Meticulously Comply with Technical Specifications
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Thoroughly review 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus' to ensure every specification is met. Document product compliance clearly. If any product is an 'equivalent', prepare a strong justification for its suitability as per eligibility requirements.

Ensures the bid is not disqualified on technical grounds.
Flawless Hankepass (ESPD) Submission
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Accurately and completely fill out the Hankepass electronically. Double-check all fields for accuracy and ensure all required confirmations are made. A single error can lead to disqualification.

Essential for bid eligibility.
Optimize Delivery Logistics
KorkeaMatala vaiva

While not a primary evaluation criterion, efficient and timely delivery within the 3-month timeframe is crucial. Highlight your logistical capabilities and any potential for earlier delivery if feasible, as this can be a subtle differentiator.

Reduces risk of non-compliance and can be a minor positive differentiator.
Offer Enhanced Warranty Support
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

If possible, offer a warranty period or service level agreement that exceeds the minimum specified in 'Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt'. This can be a low-cost differentiator that appeals to the contracting authority's long-term needs, even if not directly scored.

Provides a competitive edge beyond price.
Clarify Ambiguities Early
KorkeaMatala vaiva

If any part of the technical specifications or contract terms is unclear, utilize the simplified procurement procedure's clarification process ('Lihthankemenetluse kord') to seek information. This prevents misinterpretations and potential bid errors.

Prevents disqualification due to misunderstanding.
Kilpailuasema
Position as the most cost-effective and reliable supplier for standard IT hardware. Emphasize the ability to meet all technical requirements precisely and deliver within the specified timeframe, backed by a streamlined and error-free submission process.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

17 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (7)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (4)
Tekninen (2)
Taloudellinen (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--The tender is for the purchase of computer equipment.
--The duration of the contract is 3 months.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-01 06:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm their offer meets the tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit the offer cost in the prescribed forms.
--Bidders must explain equivalency if necessary.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is for the purchase of computer equipment for Saku Gymnasium and Saku Municipality.
--Specific technical specifications, quantities, and warranty requirements for the computer equipment are detailed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The total value of the tender is 31630.0 EUR.
--The tender evaluation will be primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--Offer cost must be submitted in the prescribed forms.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

7 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

VastavustingimusedPDF
307814_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.9 KB

Bidders must confirm their offer meets tender conditions, submit the bid price in specified formats, and explain equivalency if necessary.

Vorm 1 Pakkumuse maksumuse esildis.XLS
Vorm_1_Pakkumuse maksumuse esildis.xlsx -- 11.6 KB

The contracting authority requires a bid cost submission for the purchase of computer equipment, specifying product name, brand, model, quantity, unit price, and total cost.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307814_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids for the purchase of computer equipment primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307814_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 39.2 KB

The procurement pass is an initial proof of the company's qualification and compliance with tender conditions, which must be completed electronically.

Lihthankemenetluse kordPDF
Lihthankemenetluse kord.pdf -- 108.0 KB

This document outlines the simplified procurement procedure for the purchase of computer equipment for Saku Municipality, including bid submission requirements and the process for requesting clarifications.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 230.3 KB

The contracting authority is seeking computer equipment for Saku Gymnasium and Saku Municipal Government, specifying technical descriptions, quantities, and warranty requirements.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektPDF
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt.pdf -- 119.0 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the terms for the purchase of computer equipment, including delivery conditions, payment procedures, and warranties.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for computer equipment is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process, though it lacks specific sustainability considerations.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope, and the procedure (LM) is indicated. CPV code is provided. No disputes are noted. The financing condition is linked to an attached project, which is standard.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, specifying the items and beneficiaries. Requirements are documented through various attached documents (Hankepass, Vastavustingimused, Tehniline kirjeldus, Vorm 1). Evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting' and further detailed in a document, indicating a clear, albeit cost-focused, approach.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration (3 months), and tender validity. Key documents like technical specifications and submission forms are attached. However, the 'Value Classified' status without further explanation might leave some ambiguity for bidders.

Reiluus85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation is primarily cost-based, which is objective. Access to documents is implied through the tender platform. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are confirmed. A contract start date is not explicitly stated, but the contract duration is defined. Financing information is linked to an attached project. The short contract duration (3 months) might be a practical consideration for the scope.

•Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically sequenced (Reveal, Submission, Opening).

Kestävyys50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

•Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Vahvuudet

Clear description and objective evaluation criteria (cost-based).
Use of e-procurement and e-submission.
Well-defined technical specifications and submission forms.
Logical and consistent data presentation.

Huolenaiheet

Limited sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Ambiguity regarding 'Value Classified' status.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Suositukset

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, recyclability) into evaluation.
2. Clarify the 'Value Classified' status or provide further details if applicable.
3. Explicitly state the contract start date or a mechanism for its determination.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa