Skip to main content
Tenders

Juniper network equipment, network equipment accessories (including licenses) and product support

Open
Deadline
21 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
306500
Value
€5,000,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 17, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of a sample bid100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Tender Opening

April 17, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€5,000,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€104,435
Avg. Bids
2.5
Competition
Low
SME Winners
94%
311 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Juniper network equipment, network equipment accessories (including licenses) and product support in accordance with the technical specification
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

25 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (15)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS15
--Bidders must submit a bid proposal containing all tender documents, including the framework agreement draft, technical specification, conformity conditions, evaluation criteria, and the procurement passport (ESPD).
--The procurement passport (ESPD) is an initial confirmation from the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the response format, but it is not the document to be filled out.
--Bidders must confirm fulfillment of conditions.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not have grounds for exclusion.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must confirm fulfillment of conditions.
--Bidders must provide necessary data for contract conclusion.
--Bidders must prove manufacturer's representation rights.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must provide offers for Juniper network equipment, accessories (including licenses), and product support.
--Offers must specify technical requirements for equipment, delivery terms, and product support provision.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The cost of the bid will be evaluated using a weighting method where the lowest priced bid receives the maximum score.
--The total cost of a sample bid must be submitted.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306500_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.9 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with terms, provide necessary contract data, prove manufacturer authorization, and meet location criteria.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306500_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.3 KB

The bid price will be evaluated using a weighted method where the lowest bid receives the maximum score, and the total cost of a sample bid must be submitted.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306500_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.8 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is the bidder's initial declaration containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and expected response format, but it is not intended for completion.

Lisa 1.1 SMIT lepingute üldtingimusedPDF
Lisa 11 SMIT lepingute uldtingimused.pdf -- 264.3 KB

This document outlines the general terms and conditions for service, work, and sales contracts of the Ministry of the Interior's IT and Development Centre, governing the legal relationships and obligations of contracting parties.

Lisa 1 Raam- ja hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 1 Raam- ja hankelepingu projekt (1).doc -- 127.0 KB

The draft contract agreement outlines the terms and legal framework for the framework agreement concerning Juniper network equipment, accessories, and product support.

Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 284.7 KB

The contracting authority seeks bids for Juniper network equipment, accessories (including licenses), and product support, specifying technical requirements for equipment, delivery conditions, and product support provision.

Lisa 3.1 Ühispakkujate volikirja vormDOC
Lisa 31 Uhispakkujate volikirja vorm.docx -- 18.4 KB

This document is a power of attorney for joint bidders, authorizing an official representative to act on behalf of the joint bid and confirming joint and several liability for contract fulfillment.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
PEE.pdf -- 516.8 KB

The proposal for submitting an offer includes all tender base documents, including the framework agreement draft, technical specification, conformity conditions, evaluation criteria, and tender passport, which are necessary for the successful submission of the offer.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Juniper network equipment and support is generally well-structured, with clear financial information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability criteria and relies heavily on external documents for detailed technical and performance conditions.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement regulations, including proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and the financing condition is referenced in external documents. No disputes are noted.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear. Key requirements are outlined, and evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting. However, detailed technical specifications and performance conditions are referenced in external documents, which could be improved by direct inclusion.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the detailed technical specifications and performance conditions are only referenced in external documents (PEEs and their annexes), reducing the completeness of the core tender document itself.

Detailed technical specifications and performance conditions are referenced in external documents (PEEs and their annexes) rather than being fully integrated.
Fairness85/100

The tender is fair, with full document access implied through the e-procurement portal. The estimated value is disclosed, deadlines are reasonable, and evaluation criteria are objective. The framework agreement with reopening competition and max participants suggests a competitive process.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are confirmed. The contract start date is not explicitly stated but can be inferred from the duration and submission deadline. Financing information is referenced externally. The duration is clearly specified.

Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is funded by the EU, which implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details.
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed estimated value.
E-submission and e-procurement enabled.
Objective evaluation criteria (relative weighting).

Concerns

Reliance on external documents for detailed technical and performance conditions.
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Integrate detailed technical specifications and performance conditions directly into the tender document for improved completeness.
2. Incorporate specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria to enhance sustainability aspects.
3. Clearly state the contract start date or a method for its determination.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline