Design of the Courtyard Area Between Buildings at Mustamäe tee 167, 169, 171 and 171a
ClosedKey facts
- Estimated value
- €35,000
- Deadline
- Expired
- CPV Code
- 71320000-7 — Engineering design services
- Procedure
- Simplified procedure
Original Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.
This tender is a price-driven opportunity for technical design services. Success hinges on a highly competitive bid price, coupled with a clear demonstration of understanding and commitment to resident involvement as outlined in the SOFTacademy project. Bidders must leverage their technical expertise and cost-efficiency to secure this contract.
Cost-effective, community-centric courtyard design.
Expert technical design with seamless resident integration.
Optimize internal processes and leverage efficient sub-contractors for surveys. Focus on lean project management throughout the design phase.
Focus all efforts on excelling in the explicitly stated technical and resident engagement requirements. Ensure the bid clearly articulates how these will be met efficiently and effectively.
Thoroughly download, extract, and review all provided tender documents (Lisa 1.5, Lisa 1.3, Lisa 1.2, Lisa 1) to fully understand the scope, survey requirements, and SOFTacademy co-creation plan.
Submit the absolute lowest possible price that is still viable. Ensure the bid clearly demonstrates understanding of the design brief and resident involvement requirements, even though these are not explicitly scored beyond the price.
Given the 100% price-based evaluation, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible bid. Conduct a thorough cost analysis, identifying all direct and indirect costs, and apply a minimal but sustainable profit margin. Explore efficiencies in survey sub-contracting and internal resource allocation.
Thoroughly analyze 'Lisa 1.5 Infomaterjal' (once accessible) to understand the SOFTacademy co-creation plan. Detail how your proposed design process will integrate resident feedback and participation in a structured, compliant manner. This is a key technical requirement that, while not directly scored, is crucial for bid acceptance and demonstrating capability.
The tender requires geodetic and dendrological surveys. If not performed in-house, identify and pre-qualify reliable and cost-effective sub-contractors. Obtain firm quotes to accurately factor these costs into the bid. Ensure their methodologies align with any specifications in 'Lisa 1.2 Topo-geodeetiline uuring' and 'Lisa 1.3 Dendroloogiline uuring'.
Outline a practical and efficient method for notifying residents about the design process and opportunities for input. This should be detailed in the bid response, demonstrating proactive engagement.
Even with a price focus, subtly highlight your firm's ability to manage projects efficiently within the 21-month duration, ensuring timely delivery of the main project design.
Prioritize downloading and meticulously reviewing all provided documents (Lisa 1.5, Lisa 1.3, Lisa 1.2, Lisa 1) to capture all technical specifications, co-creation details, and survey requirements. Any missed detail could lead to disqualification or an uncompetitive bid.
Competitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
19 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
12 documents available with AI summaries
Bidders must confirm that their bid meets the tender document conditions, have not engaged in corrupt practices, and submit the bid price according to the provided structure and form.
This document presents the tender cost submission form and payment schedule for the design services tender, outlining work components, costs, and payment terms.
The tender evaluation criteria state that the design tender will be awarded to the bidder with the lowest price, with evaluation based on weighting.
The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format for expected responses, but is not intended for completion.
This tender document provides general information regarding the design of the courtyard area between Mustamäe tee 167, 169, 171, and 171a.
No summary available for this document.
No summary available for this document.
No summary available for this document.
This engagement plan outlines the project stages, including geodetic and dendrological surveys, resident notification, and the courtyard design tender process with co-creation elements.
No summary available for this document.
The tender seeks design services for the courtyard area between Mustamäe tee 167, 169, 171, and 171a, involving resident participation and adherence to the SOFTacademy project's engagement plan.
No summary available for this document.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender for courtyard design services in Tallinn is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some technical documents are not readily accessible for AI analysis.
Score Breakdown
The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure (LM), proper CPV code, and reasonable deadlines. No disputes are indicated. The value is disclosed and within limits. The duration is specified.
The description of the project is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of technical and submission needs. The evaluation criteria are mentioned as relative weighting, implying a structured approach.
Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. However, several attached documents are in formats not supported by AI analysis (e.g., .zip, .xml, .rtf), which could hinder a complete automated review. The 'Vastavustingimused' and 'Hindamiskriteeriumid' are marked as required/not required respectively, which is slightly unusual for evaluation criteria.
The tender is open to electronic submission and e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The value is disclosed, and criteria are based on relative weighting, suggesting objectivity. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is absent. The duration is specified.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent.
The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required