Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Additional furnishings and equipment for Olgina Community Centre

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
306209
Value
€60,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 04, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 23, 2026

Tender Opening

March 23, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€60,000
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€72,774
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
93%
884 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Additional furnishings and equipment for Olgina Community Centre
Green ProcurementEU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Olgina rahvamaja furnishings prioritizes cost above all else. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive pricing while meticulously adhering to all technical specifications and ensuring seamless delivery and installation. Leveraging existing supplier relationships and streamlined operations will be key to achieving the lowest possible bid.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Value: Delivering high-quality, compliant furnishings at the most competitive price.

Seamless Execution: Ensuring timely and professional delivery and installation, minimizing disruption.

Trusted Partner: A reliable supplier committed to meeting all tender requirements with precision.

Key Opportunities
Dominant focus on price as the sole evaluation criterion.
Opportunity to streamline operations for cost efficiency due to the absence of complex social or innovative requirements.
Potential for long-term relationship with Narva-Jõesuu Linnavalitsus if successful in this contract.
The tender is not divided into parts, allowing for economies of scale in procurement and logistics for the bidder.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition, requiring aggressive cost management.

Conduct thorough cost analysis of all components, explore bulk purchasing discounts, optimize logistics routes, and ensure efficient installation processes. Consider alternative materials or sourcing if they meet specifications and reduce cost.

Strict adherence to detailed technical specifications (Lisa 4) to avoid disqualification.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all technical aspects of the bid. Engage with suppliers early to confirm material availability and exact product compliance. Conduct pre-bid site visits if possible to understand installation constraints.

Ensuring all mandatory documentation and forms are correctly completed and submitted by the deadline.

Create a detailed checklist of all required documents and forms. Assign responsibility for each document and implement a multi-stage review process before submission. Utilize the provided templates (Vorm 1, Vorm 2) precisely.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A furniture supplier with a proven track record in public procurement, possessing efficient manufacturing or sourcing capabilities, strong logistics for timely delivery and installation, and a deep understanding of cost optimization without compromising on specified quality. Experience with similar community center or public building fit-outs would be advantageous.
Key Requirements
Adherence to technical specifications (dimensions, materials, color tones) as per Lisa 4 Sisustuse ja seadmete spetsifikatsioon.
Submission of a comprehensive cost estimate including all costs (transport, installation) as per Lisa 3 Maksumuse esildis.
Confirmation of fulfillment of tender conditions and submission of required forms (Vorm 1, Vorm 2).
Delivery, installation, and warranty as per Lisa 1 Hankelepingu projekt.
Compliance with Green Procurement principles.
Key Discriminators
The lowest price that still guarantees full compliance with all technical specifications.
Demonstrated efficiency in delivery and installation, minimizing project timeline risks for the client.
A clear and concise bid that leaves no room for ambiguity regarding cost or technical compliance.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a mandatory requirement, consider a brief statement on sustainable sourcing of materials or waste reduction during installation to align with the 'Green Procurement' aspect, even if not explicitly scored.
Bid Focus Areas
Total Cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price by optimizing all cost components (materials, manufacturing/sourcing, logistics, installation). This will require meticulous cost breakdown and aggressive negotiation with suppliers. Ensure the price is fully inclusive as per Lisa 3.

Recommendations6
Aggressive Cost Optimization
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct a granular cost analysis of every item in Lisa 4. Negotiate hard with suppliers for bulk discounts. Optimize logistics and installation to minimize labor and time costs. The goal is to be the absolute lowest bidder while remaining compliant.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion.
Meticulous Technical Compliance Check
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly cross-reference every detail in Lisa 4 (dimensions, materials, color tones) with your proposed products. Any deviation, however minor, can lead to disqualification. Engage with your supply chain to confirm exact product specifications.

Ensures bid is not disqualified on technical grounds.
Streamlined Submission Process
HighMed effort

Create a comprehensive checklist of all required documents and forms (Vorm 1, Vorm 2, Hankepass, etc.). Assign clear ownership for each document and implement a review process to ensure accuracy and completeness before the deadline.

Prevents disqualification due to administrative errors.
Highlight Installation Efficiency
MediumLow effort

While not explicitly scored, emphasize in your bid narrative (if space allows or in accompanying documents) your proven ability to deliver and install efficiently, minimizing disruption to the rahvamaja's operations. This can be a subtle differentiator.

Adds perceived value beyond just price.
Reference Green Procurement
LowLow effort

Briefly mention any sustainable practices in your material sourcing or waste management during installation, aligning with the 'Green Procurement' flag, even if not a scored element. This shows awareness and commitment.

Demonstrates alignment with the contracting authority's broader objectives.
Confirm Material Availability and Lead Times
HighMed effort

Proactively confirm with your suppliers that all specified materials and products are readily available and can be delivered within the 4-month contract duration. Secure commitments to avoid delays.

Mitigates risk of contract non-performance due to supply chain issues.
Competitive Positioning
Position your bid as the most cost-effective solution that fully meets all technical requirements. Emphasize your ability to deliver the best value for money, making your offer the clear choice for a price-sensitive procurement.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (6)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm fulfillment of conditions set by the contracting authority (306209_vastavustingimused.pdf).
--The tender is not divided into parts to ensure better coordination, uniform quality, and functional/stylistic suitability of furnishings and equipment.
--The contract will cover the delivery, installation, and warranty of furnishings and equipment for Olgina rahvamaja (Lisa 1 Hankelepingu projekt.docx).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds mentioned in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must confirm fulfillment of tender conditions.
--Bidders must provide information regarding joint tenders.
--Bidders must provide information regarding business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must supply additional furnishings and equipment for Olgina rahvamaja as per the technical description (Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus.doc).
--Bidders must adhere to the technical requirements, dimensions, materials, and color tones for each product specified (Lisa 4 Sisustuse ja seadmete spetsifikatsioon.docx).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.
--Bidders must submit a cost estimate including all costs, such as transport and installation, according to the provided product list (Lisa 3 Maksumuse esildis.xlsx).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306209_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.5 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with the tender document conditions, including information on joint bids, trade secrets, and proof of equivalence.

Lisa 3 Maksumuse esildisXLS
Lisa 3 Maksumuse esildis.xlsx -- 13.4 KB

The bidder must submit a cost proposal including all expenses, such as transport and installation, according to the provided list of products.

Lisa 4 Sisustuse ja seadmete spetsifikatsioonDOC
Lisa 4 Sisustuse ja seadmete spetsifikatsioon... -- 3.0 MB

The contracting authority is seeking additional furniture and equipment for Olgina community center, specifying technical requirements, dimensions, materials, and color tones for each item that bidders must meet.

Vorm 2 Osalemise taotlusDOC
Vorm 2 Osalemise taotlus.docx -- 26.6 KB

This form is an application to participate in the tender "Olgina community center additional furnishings and equipment", where the bidder confirms compliance with conditions and provides their details.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306209_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306209_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 62.9 KB

The procurement passport (ESPD) is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, clarifying the contracting authority's conditions and expected responses, but is not intended for completion.

Hanke alusdokumendidDOC
Hanke alusdokumendid_täiendav sisustus.docx -- 80.9 KB

Narva-Jõesuu Municipality is seeking suppliers for additional furnishings and equipment for the Olgina community center through an open procurement procedure.

Lisa 1 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 1 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 40.0 KB

The draft contract outlines the supply, installation, and warranty of furnishings and equipment for Olgina community center, defining the parties, object, and its components.

Lisa 2.1 Tehnilise kirjelduse lisadZIP
Lisa 21 Tehnilise kirjelduse lisad.zip -- 646.5 KB

No summary available for this document.

Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus.doc -- 41.0 KB

The tender seeks additional furnishings and equipment for Olgina community center, providing a technical specification that details the required products and their characteristics.

Vorm 1 VolikiriDOC
Vorm 1 Volikiri .docx -- 25.9 KB

This document is a power of attorney, confirming the bidder's representative's right to conclude and fulfill the procurement contract.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for additional furnishings and equipment for Olgina community center is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations and a more streamlined submission process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope of the tender. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type 'A' suggests an open procedure, which is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required furnishings and equipment is detailed through attached specifications (Lisa 2, Lisa 4). Evaluation criteria are clearly stated as the total cost. Conditions for participation are outlined in 'Vastavustingimused'.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like technical specifications, cost proposal forms, and draft contract are attached. However, the 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' is in an XML format not directly usable by AI analysis, and 'Lisa 2.1 Tehnilise kirjelduse lisad' is a zip file.

•XML format for ESPD not directly analyzable
•ZIP file for technical description addenda not directly analyzable
Fairness85/100

The evaluation criterion is solely based on the total cost, which is objective. Full document access is implied through the provided links and attachments. The procedure is not divided into parts, which the authority justifies by aiming for better coordination and quality, a reasonable explanation.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is indicated. A URL for the opening place is provided. The contract duration is specified. However, the reliance on specific document formats (XML, ZIP) for some key information might pose minor practical challenges for bidders if not easily accessible or convertible.

•Potential minor practical challenges with XML/ZIP file formats for certain documents
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender valid period aligns with the submission and opening dates.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' and 'EU Funded' as characteristics. However, no specific social aspects or innovation requirements are detailed in the provided information, limiting the score in this category.

•Lack of specific details on social aspects and innovation

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and requirements
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Well-defined submission forms and process
EU funded status indicated

Concerns

Limited detail on sustainability aspects beyond 'Green Procurement'
Some key documents in non-directly analyzable formats (XML, ZIP)
No explicit mention of social criteria

Recommendations

1. Provide more specific details or targets for green procurement and social aspects.
2. Ensure all essential documents are provided in easily accessible and analyzable formats.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes