Eye injection aid/device
ClosedOriginal Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
20 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
6 documents available with AI summaries
Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions, provide contact details, submit a joint bidders' power of attorney if applicable, declare any business secrets, and confirm adherence to EU sanctions for subcontractors and suppliers.
This document is a tender form detailing technical and general requirements for an eye injection aid, requiring bidders to confirm product compliance, submit samples, and provide training if successful, along with a price offer.
This document describes the bid evaluation methodology, where the sole criterion is the total cost of the bid (100% weight), with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum points.
This ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) is an informational document explaining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format for the electronic submission of the ESPD, which bidders must complete separately.
This document is a draft framework agreement outlining the general terms and obligations between the contracting authority and the supplier for the "Eye injection aid" public procurement, emphasizing the supplier's required licenses, experience, and expertise.
This general document for Aktsiaselts Ida-Tallinna Keskhaigla's "Eye injection aid" tender provides an overview of the contracting authority, procurement procedures, general submission terms, and references the technical specifications and draft framework agreement.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a transparent lowest-price evaluation. However, the explicit requirement for 'one specific type' of aid raises concerns about potential tailoring and restricted competition, and it lacks sustainability considerations.
Score Breakdown
The tender appears largely compliant with reasonable deadlines and standard documentation. Minor inconsistencies exist regarding the procedure code and the 'negotiation allowed' characteristic versus the 100% price evaluation.
The description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and well-documented. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 100% price-based. The potential for negotiation, despite the price-only evaluation, could be clearer.
Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, and duration, is provided. All relevant documents are attached. However, the exact region is unspecified, and procedure codes are marked 'N/A'.
The tender offers full document access, discloses value, and has reasonable deadlines. The 100% lowest-price evaluation is objective. However, the explicit requirement for 'one specific type of eye injection aid' and the justification for not dividing the procurement, while explained, significantly raise concerns about potential tailoring to a specific product or supplier, thereby limiting competition.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. The opening place URL is provided, implying the platform for all tender activities.
Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no detected disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies exist in the procedure codes and the 'negotiation allowed' characteristic versus the evaluation method.
The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required