Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Energy-efficient reconstruction of Laiuse Basic School study building

Closed

Updated October 12, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
304587
Value
€1,655,000
Location
Estonia
Published
January 13, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 10, 2026

Tender Opening

February 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€1,655,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
45214200-2 — Construction work for school buildings
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
€1,655,000
Duration
9 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
87
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Laiuse põhikooli õppehoone energiasäästlikuks rekonstrueerimise ehitustööde tegemine
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

24 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (5)
Technical (7)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) electronically.
--Submit a power of attorney for joint bidders, if the bid is submitted jointly.
--Justify the existence of any business secrets, if applicable.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The tenderer and its subcontractors must meet the conditions and exclusion grounds of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Subcontractors must not be involved in criminal offenses, and the main contractor must provide information on subcontractor compliance during the contract execution phase.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The tenderer must meet the qualification requirements as per the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney for joint bidders must be submitted.
--The tenderer must confirm the compliance of the bid with all tender conditions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Perform the energy-efficient reconstruction of Laiuse primary school building as a main contractor.
--Achieve the building's energy efficiency rating in accordance with energy audit package 3.
--Ensure that greenhouse gas emissions do not increase.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit the bid cost according to the predefined structure.
--Submit unit and total prices for preparation and demolition works as per the cost table.
--Note that bids will be evaluated 100% on price, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

12 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
304587_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the grounds for disqualifying first-tier subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on criminal convictions and requiring the main contractor to provide information regarding their subcontractors' eligibility.

VastavustingimusedPDF
304587_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.6 KB

This document specifies tender compliance conditions, requiring a power of attorney for joint bidders, justification for business secrets, confirmation of bid adherence to terms, and submission of costs according to the provided structure.

Pakkuja esitab Lisa 3- maksumuse tabeliXLS
Lisa 3 Maksumuse tabel.xlsx -- 30.7 KB

This document is Appendix 3, a cost table requiring bidders to provide unit and total prices for various preparation and demolition works for the Laiuse basic school reconstruction project.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304587_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document outlines that bids will be evaluated 100% based on price, with the lowest offer receiving the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304587_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.7 KB

This document clarifies the conditions, exclusion grounds, and qualification criteria for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) within the tender for the energy-efficient reconstruction of Laiuse Basic School, which bidders must complete electronically.

Ehitusprojekti ekspertiisi arvamusDOC
251024E, Laiuse koolihoone (Kuremaa tee 30, L... -- 2.8 MB

This document is an expert opinion on the basic design projects for the reconstruction of Laiuse school building, detailing the responsible specialist's qualifications and areas of activity.

ekspertiisi märkuste tabelXLS
251024E, Laiuse koolihoone (Kuremaa tee 30, L... -- 354.4 KB

This document is a summary table of non-conformities found during the expertise of the construction project for the Laiuse school building, describing project deficiencies and necessary corrections.

juhised pakkujaleDOC
Hankedokument_Juhised pakkujale.docx -- 33.6 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders on the energy-efficient reconstruction of Laiuse school building, clarifying conditions for relying on other entities' resources and guiding on bid structure and where to find required documents.

EnergiaauditSIG
Kuremaa tee 30_Laiuse_kool_energiaaudit_korri... -- 4.4 MB

No summary available for this document.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 30.0 KB

This document outlines the energy-efficient reconstruction of Laiuse Jaan Poska Basic School under a general contract, aiming to achieve an energy performance rating compliant with energy audit package 3 without increasing greenhouse gas emissions.

lepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 hankelepingu projekt Laiuse.docx -- 49.2 KB

This document is a draft works contract outlining the legal framework, general terms, and conditions that will govern the relationship between the Jõgeva Rural Municipality Government and the selected contractor for the energy-efficient reconstruction of Laiuse Basic School.

Tugevvoolu projekt (sisevalgustuse paigaldamiseks)SIG
pT2009 Laiuse Jaan Poska põhikooli elektripai... -- 42.6 MB

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

87
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the energy-efficient reconstruction of Laiuse primary school building is generally well-structured with clear administrative and technical requirements. However, the 100% price-based evaluation and some aspects of sustainability criteria raise concerns regarding achieving optimal value for money and truly ambitious environmental outcomes.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender appears legally compliant, adhering to standard EU procurement principles regarding exclusion grounds, qualification requirements, and the use of the ESPD.

Clarity80/100

Most requirements are clearly stated, particularly regarding submission procedures, financial structure, and the use of ESPD. However, the 'greenhouse gas emissions' requirement lacks specific metrics or a clear baseline.

•Lack of specific metrics/baseline for 'greenhouse gas emissions' requirement.
Completeness100/100

The tender provides a comprehensive set of documents and requirements covering administrative, technical, and financial aspects.

Fairness100/100

The requirement for a single main contractor, while potentially practical for project management, might limit competition for smaller or specialized firms. The 100% price-based evaluation could disadvantage bidders offering higher quality or more innovative, albeit potentially more expensive, solutions.

•Requirement for a single main contractor may limit competition.
•100% price-based evaluation may not ensure best value for money or incentivize higher quality/innovation.
Practicality60/100

The requirements for project management, coordination, and addressing expert opinion deficiencies are practical for a construction project of this nature. The 9-month contract duration seems reasonable for the scope.

Data Consistency100/100

Information provided across the basic information, description, and requirements appears consistent.

Sustainability25/100

While the project aims for 'energy-efficient reconstruction' and mentions 'greenhouse gas emissions,' the sustainability criteria are weak. The 'do not increase' emissions requirement is not ambitious for an energy-efficient project, and the 100% price evaluation discourages more sustainable, potentially higher-cost solutions. The automated check also flagged 'Not green procurement.'

•Weak and unspecific 'greenhouse gas emissions' requirement (e.g., 'do not increase' instead of 'reduce').
•100% price evaluation disincentivizes more sustainable or innovative solutions.

Strengths

Clear administrative and submission requirements, including ESPD usage.
Specific technical goal for energy efficiency rating (energy audit package 3).
Structured financial submission requirements (cost table, unit/total prices).
Proactive approach to quality by addressing expert opinion deficiencies.
Comprehensive project management and coordination expectations.

Concerns

100% price-based evaluation risks compromising quality and value for money for a complex reconstruction project.
Weak and unspecific sustainability criteria, particularly the 'do not increase' greenhouse gas emissions requirement.
Requirement for a single main contractor might limit competition, especially for smaller or specialized firms.
Lack of explicit social or innovation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Re-evaluate the evaluation criteria to include quality, technical merit, and sustainability aspects alongside price (e.g., Most Economically Advantageous Tender - MEAT).
2. Strengthen and clarify sustainability requirements with measurable targets for emission reduction and potentially lifecycle cost analysis.
3. Consider dividing the tender into lots if feasible, or clearly justify the single main contractor requirement to ensure broader market access.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes