Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Procurement of technical maintenance service for objects in the Southern region (Viljandi-Valga) 2026 routine technical maintenance

Closed

Updated October 12, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
304264
Value
€1,936,144
Location
Estonia
Published
December 19, 2025
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

December 19, 2025

Deadline for Questions

February 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 12, 2026

Tender Opening

February 12, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€1,936,144
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
70332000-7 — Non-residential property services
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
€1,936,144
Duration
72 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
71
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€229,828
Avg. Bids
4.0
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
68%
135 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Tehnohooldusteenuse hankimine Lõuna piirkonnas olevatele objektidele - Olustvere Teenindus- ja Maamajanduskool, Viljandi Gümnaasium, Valga Riigimaja, Viljandi Muuseum, Mart Saare majamuuseum, Viljandi Kutseõppekeskus ja Viljandi Päästekomando - kuni 72 kuuks, EVS 807 koodide 210, 220, 230, 240, 250, 270, 289 osas.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidder must not be subject to any exclusion grounds detailed in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) guide.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
304264_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.6 KB

This document outlines general tender submission conditions, including marking business secrets, the structure for submitting the bid price using Forms 2 and 3, and requirements for the bidder's project manager.

Vorm 2DOC
Vorm 2.docx -- 17.9 KB

This is a tender participation application form where the bidder confirms acceptance of procurement conditions, compliance of the bid with requirements, commits to performing works at the cost specified in Form 3, and declares business secrets if applicable.

VORM 3XLS
VORM 3.xlsx -- 38.9 KB

This document is a proposal cost table requiring bidders to enter prices for technical maintenance services for properties in the Southern region, covering both regular and additional services.

Vorm 4DOC
Vorm 4.docx -- 20.1 KB

This form is for submitting the curriculum vitae of the proposed project manager, detailing their education, professional certificates, and experience in technical maintenance projects.

Vorm 8DOC
Vorm 8.docx -- 13.7 KB

This form is for joint bids, allowing one bidder to be authorized to act on behalf of the others in the procurement procedure "Tehnohooldusteenuse hankimine Lõuna piirkonna objektidele (Viljandi-Valga) 2026 tavatehnohooldus".

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304264_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that the sole evaluation criterion for bids is the contract cost (during the service period), where the lowest-priced bid receives the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304264_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 67.0 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the contracting authority's conditions and requirements for bidder qualification and exclusion grounds, but it is not to be submitted with the tender.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Alusdokument pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.do... -- 63.2 KB

This document provides instructions for electronic proposal submission, outlines administrative procedures, specifies mandatory site visits for technical maintenance services in the Viljandi-Valga region, and references technical specifications and contract terms in appendices.

Lisa 1 Üldine tehniline kirjeldusZIP
Lisa 1 ÜLDINE TEHNILINE KIRJELDUS.zip -- 881.2 KB

No summary available for this document.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 126.0 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract outlining the terms and conditions for providing technical maintenance services, including definitions, general and special conditions, and contact details.

Objektipõhised tehnilised kirjeldused (Lisa 1.1-1.7)DOC
Objektipõhised tehnilised kirjeldused.docx -- 14.1 KB

This document contains object-specific technical descriptions for the technical maintenance services required for objects in the Southern region (Viljandi-Valga), detailing requirements for each location.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

71
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender demonstrates good overall structure and transparency with detailed technical specifications and a commitment to e-procurement, but is significantly hampered by a critical inconsistency in its evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, featuring reasonable deadlines, appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD and 'or equivalent' clauses aligns with EU/national regulations. However, the procedure type 'A' with 'N/A' code lacks full clarity.

•Procedure type 'A' with 'N/A' code is not fully defined.
Clarity70/100

The description, technical specifications, and required forms are generally clear and well-documented. However, a significant contradiction exists between the stated 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria in the basic information and Document 3 explicitly stating 'sole evaluation criterion... contract cost (lowest price)', which creates ambiguity for bidders.

•Contradiction between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' and Document 3 stating 'sole evaluation criterion: contract cost (lowest price)'.
Completeness80/100

The tender is largely complete, providing all essential information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, estimated value, duration, and specific location details. A comprehensive set of 12 documents, including technical specifications and contract drafts, is provided.

•AI could not analyze content of ZIP/XML documents (ESPD XML, General Technical Description ZIP), requiring manual review for full content verification.
Fairness75/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and e-procurement capabilities. The 'or equivalent' clause is positive. However, the mandatory site visits with required signatures for most locations could pose a practical barrier for some bidders, potentially limiting competition.

•Mandatory site visits with required signatures for most locations could disproportionately affect smaller or non-local bidders.
Practicality70/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the mandatory site visits add a practical burden for bidders. No explicit financing source beyond the estimated value is provided.

•Mandatory site visits with required signatures add a practical burden for bidders.
•No explicit financing source beyond the estimated value.
Data Consistency60/100

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there is a critical inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria. The basic information states 'relative_weighting', while a specific document (Document 3) clearly defines it as 'lowest price'. This is a direct contradiction.

•Direct contradiction between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' in basic info and Document 3 stating 'sole evaluation criterion: contract cost (lowest price)'.
Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks specific criteria or focus on social aspects or innovation, and is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

•No explicit social criteria.
•No explicit innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear and detailed technical specifications, including EVS codes and object-specific descriptions.
Comprehensive set of tender documents, including draft contract and required forms.
Commitment to e-procurement, electronic submission, and WTO/GPA principles.
Explicit inclusion of 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic.
Reasonable submission deadline and clear timeline.

Concerns

Critical data inconsistency regarding evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Mandatory site visits with required signatures may create barriers for some bidders.
Limited clarity on the exact procurement procedure type ('A' with N/A code).
Lack of explicit social criteria or innovation focus in sustainability aspects.
AI could not analyze content of ZIP/XML documents.

Recommendations

1. Issue an immediate addendum to clarify the exact evaluation criteria to avoid bidder confusion.
2. Re-evaluate the necessity of mandatory site visits with signatures, considering alternative verification methods to enhance fairness.
3. Consider incorporating specific social criteria and encouraging innovative solutions in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes