Estonia, Estonia
€1,936,144
February 12, 2026 at 11:00
Services
304264
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender demonstrates good overall structure and transparency with detailed technical specifications and a commitment to e-procurement, but is significantly hampered by a critical inconsistency in its evaluation criteria.
The tender generally complies with legal requirements, featuring reasonable deadlines, appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD and 'or equivalent' clauses aligns with EU/national regulations. However, the procedure type 'A' with 'N/A' code lacks full clarity.
The description, technical specifications, and required forms are generally clear and well-documented. However, a significant contradiction exists between the stated 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria in the basic information and Document 3 explicitly stating 'sole evaluation criterion... contract cost (lowest price)', which creates ambiguity for bidders.
The tender is largely complete, providing all essential information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, estimated value, duration, and specific location details. A comprehensive set of 12 documents, including technical specifications and contract drafts, is provided.
The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and e-procurement capabilities. The 'or equivalent' clause is positive. However, the mandatory site visits with required signatures for most locations could pose a practical barrier for some bidders, potentially limiting competition.
Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the mandatory site visits add a practical burden for bidders. No explicit financing source beyond the estimated value is provided.
While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there is a critical inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria. The basic information states 'relative_weighting', while a specific document (Document 3) clearly defines it as 'lowest price'. This is a direct contradiction.
The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks specific criteria or focus on social aspects or innovation, and is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes