Tenders

Applied research for harmonizing requirements related to economic activities

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 05, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
304155
Value
€50,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 11, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Project plan, schedule, and methodology for performing the work70%
Total cost of the offer30%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 05, 2026

Tender Opening

March 05, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€50,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
86
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€187,707
Avg. Bids
2.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
1,029 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The aim of the applied research is to develop a solution that allows for harmonizing the connections between EMTAK2025 codes and their associated economic activity requirements, and to design a future solution for keeping the connections up-to-date and accurately defining them. More detailed conditions are provided in the public procurement documents.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (1)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Submit a project plan.
--Submit a schedule.
--Submit a methodology.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Comply with the mandatory exclusion grounds specified in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Comply with the general participation requirements set out in the basic procurement documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Meet the qualification requirements described by the contracting authority in the procurement pass and ESPD guide.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Propose a project team consisting of a project manager, business analyst, and legal expert.
--Ensure that proposed team members meet specific experience and competence requirements.
--Possess the capability to conduct applied research on harmonizing requirements related to economic activities.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit the total cost of the tender.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
304155_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

This document outlines tender submission requirements, including the project plan, schedule, methodology, CVs for key team members, and details of authorized company representatives.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304155_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, where 30% of the weight is given to the total cost of the offer and 70% to the project plan, schedule, and methodology for performing the work.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304155_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 67.4 KB

This document is an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected qualification requirements for the applied research tender.

Hankelepingu projektPDF
RHAD Hankelepingu projekt.pdf -- 186.1 KB

This document is a draft contract for the applied research "Harmonization of requirements related to economic activity," outlining the terms, scope, deadlines, and payment for the work.

Hindamismetoodika kirjeldusPDF
RHAD Hindamismetoodika kirjeldus.pdf -- 360.1 KB

This document describes the evaluation methodology for the tender proposals, where 30% of the total score is based on the bid's cost and 70% on the project plan, schedule, and methodology for execution.

Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
RHAD Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 203.1 KB

This document is the technical specification for an applied research project aimed at harmonizing requirements related to economic activities by mapping problems and developing a data governance model concerning EMTAK codes.

Vastavustingimuste lisa- Meeskonnaliikmete kompetentsPDF
RHAD Vastavustingimuste lisa- Meeskonnaliikme... -- 366.4 KB

This document outlines the required team composition (project manager, business analyst, legal expert) and their specific experience and competence requirements for fulfilling the tender contract.

Riigihanke alusdokument (RHAD üldosa)PDF
Riigihanke alusdokument (RHAD uldosa).pdf -- 368.6 KB

This document is the general part of the basic tender documents for the "Applied research for harmonizing economic activity requirements" procurement, defining the composition of tender documents, general conditions, and basic bidder participation requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

86
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for applied research is well-structured and transparent, demonstrating strong legal compliance and clarity in its requirements and evaluation criteria. While it benefits from EU funding and an inherent innovation focus, explicit green or social sustainability criteria are notably absent.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender appears to comply well with legal requirements, featuring reasonable deadlines (22 days), clear CPV codes, and adherence to EU funding regulations (RRF). The use of ESPD and electronic submission further supports compliance. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Clarity90/100

The tender's description is clear, and requirements are well-documented across various attachments. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined with relative weightings (30% cost, 70% quality), providing transparency for bidders. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and easy to understand.

Completeness95/100

This tender is highly complete, providing all essential information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, estimated value, and location. The presence of nine detailed documents, including a draft contract and technical specifications, ensures bidders have all necessary information.

Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, and reasonable submission deadlines. Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent, and e-procurement is enabled. While team competence requirements are specific, they appear justified for the applied research nature of the project and do not suggest tailoring to a specific company.

Practicality80/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the document URL is provided. Financing information is clear (RRF funds). However, the exact contract start date and duration are not explicitly stated in the summary, though they are likely detailed within the full tender documents.

Contract start date and duration not explicitly in summary.
Data Consistency95/100

All key fields are populated, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent, indicating a well-managed and coherent tender process.

Sustainability60/100

The tender is EU-funded (RRF), which often implies higher standards. The project itself, being applied research for a 'future solution,' has an inherent innovation focus. However, explicit green procurement or social criteria are not mentioned as part of the tender requirements or evaluation, which is a missed opportunity.

Lack of explicit green procurement or social criteria.

Strengths

Clear and detailed evaluation criteria (30% cost, 70% quality).
Comprehensive documentation, including draft contract and technical specifications.
Transparent financial information and EU funding source.
Reasonable submission deadline and electronic submission enabled.
The project itself has an inherent innovation focus (applied research for a future solution).

Concerns

Lack of explicit green procurement or social responsibility criteria.
Specific team competence requirements, while likely justified, could be perceived as potentially limiting competition if overly narrow.
Contract duration and exact start date are not explicitly in the summary, though likely in full documents.

Recommendations

1. Integrate explicit green and social procurement criteria into future tenders, especially given EU funding.
2. Ensure that team competence requirements, while necessary, are defined broadly enough to encourage wider participation without compromising quality.
3. For future summaries, explicitly state the estimated contract duration.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline