Procurement of commemorative coins (Sipsik)
ClosedOriginal Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
17 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
8 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines mandatory compliance conditions for the "Pühendusmüntide hange (Sipsik)" tender, covering requirements for joint bids, bid submission, cost structure, business secret declarations, and restrictions on involving sanctioned Russian entities as subcontractors or suppliers.
This document outlines the evaluation criteria for Eesti Pank's commemorative coin tender (Sipsik), focusing 100% on the total bid cost, which includes expenses for 3D models, coin production, coin cards, transport, and insurance.
This document is an explanatory version of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the contracting authority's conditions and the expected format for bidder responses to find a mint for 2-euro commemorative coins and coin cards.
No summary available for this document.
This document serves as the main body of the procurement documents for Eesti Pank's commemorative coin (Sipsik) tender, outlining general procurement data, technical specifications, contract terms, proposal structure, submission, and evaluation.
This document presents the draft contract between Eesti Pank and the supplier for the production, packaging, and delivery of 1 million 'Sipsik' 2-euro commemorative coins, outlining the contract's object, parties' obligations, specifications, quantities, and prices.
This document presents the design for the Sipsik commemorative coin, outlining the visual and technical specifications that bidders must adhere to during production.
```json
{
"summary_ee": "Dokument kirjeldab 1 000 000 Sipsiku 2-eurose pühendusmündi tehnilisi spetsifikatsioone, sealhulgas kvaliteedinõudeid (käibemünt ja BU), disaini loomist, matriitside tootmist, ematempliturvalisust ja pakendamist.",
"summary_en": "This document outlines the technical specifications for producing 1,000,000 'Sipsik' 2-euro commemorative coins, including quality requirements (circulation and BU), design creation, die production, master die security, and packaging.",
"summary_lv": "Šis dokuments apraksta 1 000 000 "Sipsik" 2 eiro piemiņas monētu ražošanas tehniskās specifikācijas, tostarp kvalitātes prasības (aprites un BU), dizaina izveidi, matricu ražošanu, galveno matricu drošību un iepakošanu.",
"is_required": false,
"document_type": "Tehnilised Spetsifikatsioonid"
}
```
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender for commemorative coin minting is generally well-structured and clear, with strong emphasis on cost-effectiveness and technical specifications, though it has minor gaps in explicit contract duration and broader sustainability aspects.
Score Breakdown
The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable deadlines, clear CPV codes, and adherence to EU/national regulations, including mandatory exclusion grounds and ESPD usage. The 'Type: A (Code: N/A)' is a minor ambiguity in procedure definition.
The tender is highly clear and unambiguous. The description, AI-extracted requirements, and evaluation criteria (100% total bid cost) are well-documented and easy to understand. Technical specifications are detailed.
Most essential information, including basic details, financial data, and detailed requirements, is provided. However, the explicit contract duration is not stated in the main overview, which is a notable omission.
Fairness is strong, with full document access, reasonable deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria based solely on cost. E-procurement is enabled, and requirements, while specialized, are not tailored to a single company.
Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date is known. However, the absence of explicit contract duration in the overview and limited financing details beyond the estimated value slightly reduce practicality for bidders' planning.
Data is largely consistent and logical, with key fields populated and no detected disputes or suspensions. Dates are sequential and make sense within the procurement timeline.
The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, it lacks specific social criteria and an innovation focus, and is not identified as EU funded.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required