Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Creation of community-based supported housing in Elva municipality

Closed

Updated October 12, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
302172
Value
€60,298
Location
Estonia
Published
January 02, 2026
Organization
Elva Vallavalitsus
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

January 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 03, 2026

Tender Opening

February 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
View Original

Key facts

Buyer
Elva Vallavalitsus
Estimated value
€60,298
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
71240000-2 — Architectural, engineering and planning services
Procedure
Open procedure
Source
Estonian Public Procurement Register
Budget
€60,298
Duration
9 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
90
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Käesoleva riigihanke objekt on hankedokumentides kirjeldatud Elva Pikk 26 hoone ja hooviala projekteerimine. Projekti eesmärk on luua Elva valda kaasaegne ja ligipääsetavuse nõuetele vastav kogukonnapõhine toetatud elamise teenusmaja, et tagada madala ja keskmise abi- ja toetusvajadusega inimestele eluase ning ennetada nende üldhooldusteenusele suunamist. Põhieesmärk on tähtaegselt ja optimaalsete kuludega Pikk 26, Elva aadressil paikneva hoone, õueala ja välitrasside projekteerimistööde läbiviimine selliselt, et oleks võimalik korraldada ehitusööde riigihange.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Similar open tenders

All open tenders in Estonia

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

25 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (9)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--The submission deadline is 2026-02-03 12:00:00.
--In case of a joint bid, "Form 1 - Power of Attorney for Joint Bidders.docx" must be submitted.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The bidder must meet the conditions outlined in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), which covers exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bidder must electronically submit the required information to prove their qualification.
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney for joint bidders must be submitted.
--Joint bidders are solidarily liable.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--The design services must cover the renovation and extension of the Elva Pikk 26 building and its yard area.
--The design must create a modern, energy-efficient, and accessible community-based supported living service house.
--The design must emphasize BIM (Building Information Modeling).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids will be evaluated solely based on the total cost of the design works.
--The lowest price will receive maximum points.
--The bidder must confirm the cost structure.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
302172_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.6 KB

This document outlines tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint bid power of attorney, rules for marking business secrets, confirmation of bid compliance with tender documents, and bid cost structure, requiring bidders to confirm and adhere to these terms.

Vorm1 - ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Vorm 1 - Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 16.0 KB

This document is a power of attorney for joint bidders, designating a representative for the procurement process and contract execution, while confirming the joint and several liability of the joint bidders.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
302172_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

This document specifies that bids will be evaluated solely on the total cost of design works, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
302172_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.2 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide to the conditions and required information for the electronic ESPD, which bidders must submit to demonstrate their qualifications for the Elva municipality's community-based supported housing design tender.

Pikk 26 teenusmaja eskiisprojektZIP
Eskiisprojekt.zip -- 6.1 MB

No summary available for this document.

HankejuhendDOC
Hankejuhend.docx -- 57.6 KB

This document is the tender guide for Elva Rural Municipality Government's public procurement "Creation of community-based supported housing in Elva municipality," outlining the terms and procedures for the open tender process.

Lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus Pikk 26.docx -- 42.2 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements for the design of the renovation, extension, and courtyard of the Elva Pikk 26 building, aiming to create a modern, energy-efficient, and accessible community-based supported living facility, emphasizing BIM, durability, and low maintenance costs.

Lisa 2 - Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 - Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 60.3 KB

This document is a draft design services contract for the creation of community-based supported housing in Elva municipality, outlining the terms between the client and the contractor.

Vorm 2 - Andmed referentsobjekti(de) kohta ja tuginetava isiku kasutamise vormDOC
Vorm 2 - Andmed referentsobjekti(de) kohta ja... -- 16.1 KB

Bidders must use this form to provide details of their past reference projects and completed works, including information on the verifying party or source, and outline the process for utilizing the capacity of a relied-upon entity.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

90
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender seeks design services for a community-based supported living facility, emphasizing modern, energy-efficient, and accessible design with BIM. While the project's objective is commendable and some technical requirements are clear, the sole reliance on price for bid evaluation raises significant concerns about achieving optimal quality and long-term value for a complex design service.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender appears legally compliant with standard EU procurement principles, including mandatory exclusion grounds and ESPD usage. No specific legal non-compliance issues were identified based on the provided content.

Clarity80/100

The project description and technical objectives are generally clear, outlining the desired outcome for the facility. The use of specific forms (Form 1, Form 2) for submissions aids clarity in the application process.

•Lack of detailed quantitative or qualitative criteria for reference objects in the extracted requirements could lead to ambiguity in assessing technical capability.
Completeness100/100

The tender outlines key aspects of the design work, submission requirements, and evaluation criteria. The documentation seems sufficient for bidders to understand the scope.

•The extracted requirements lack specific, measurable criteria for evaluating technical capability beyond requiring submission of references, which could make objective comparison difficult.
•The absence of quality criteria in the evaluation framework is a major gap for a design service tender.
Fairness100/100

The tender appears fair in its general structure, requiring standard documentation and allowing joint bids. No indications of requirements being tailored for a specific company were detected.

•The sole reliance on price for evaluating design services might disadvantage bidders offering higher quality, more innovative, or more sustainable solutions, potentially leading to a 'race to the bottom' on price rather than value for money.
Practicality80/100

The electronic submission process and the provision of specific forms contribute to the practicality of submitting bids. The 9-month contract duration seems reasonable for a design project of this scope.

•The price-only evaluation for design services is often impractical for achieving the best long-term outcome, as it may incentivize designs that are cheaper to produce but more expensive to build or maintain, potentially undermining the project's goals of durability and low maintenance costs.
Data Consistency100/100

No inconsistencies were detected in the provided tender information or extracted requirements.

Sustainability25/100

The description explicitly mentions the goal of creating an 'energy-efficient' design, which is a positive step towards environmental sustainability. However, broader sustainability aspects are not explicitly integrated.

•Lack of explicit broader sustainability (environmental, social) criteria beyond energy efficiency, especially for an EU-funded project with a social purpose (community-based supported living).

Strengths

Clear project objective and detailed description of the desired outcome (modern, accessible, energy-efficient supported living facility).
Mandatory use of BIM (Building Information Modeling) promotes modern design practices and efficiency.
Electronic submission and use of standardized forms enhance transparency and ease of participation.
EU funding indicates adherence to broader EU procurement principles.

Concerns

Sole reliance on price for evaluating design services is a significant concern, potentially compromising design quality, innovation, and long-term value.
Lack of detailed qualitative or quantitative criteria for technical capability (e.g., specific requirements for reference projects, key personnel qualifications) in the extracted requirements.
Absence of explicit broader sustainability (environmental, social) criteria, despite the project's nature and EU funding.
The price-only evaluation method may not align with the stated goal of ensuring 'quality of the solution' if quality is not formally assessed.

Recommendations

1. Re-evaluate the award criteria to include quality aspects (e.g., design methodology, team experience, proposed solutions for energy efficiency/accessibility beyond minimums) alongside price, using a Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT) approach.
2. Provide more specific and measurable criteria for technical capability, particularly regarding reference projects and key personnel qualifications, to ensure a robust assessment of bidders' experience.
3. Integrate explicit green and social procurement criteria where relevant, aligning with EU funding objectives and the project's social purpose.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

✨Want us to handle this tender?Let's Win This Tender