Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginGet an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginUpgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login30 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
24 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the conditions for controlling and excluding subcontractors during the contract performance stage, focusing on grounds such as convictions for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking.
This document details the mandatory requirements for submitting a tender, including the initial work schedule, bid cost structure, proof of representation, and a confirmation letter, ensuring full compliance with all tender conditions for the design and construction of residential buildings in Narva and Kohtla-Järve.
This document is a cost submission form for design and construction works, requiring bidders to provide unit prices and total costs for various project phases.
This document is an initial schedule of works for the design and construction of a residential building in Narva, requiring the bidder to outline the timeline for various project phases over 48 weeks.
This form is a power of attorney for signing the tender submission, authorizing a designated person to sign the bid on behalf of the bidder.
This document is a power of attorney for joint bidders, designating an authorized representative to act on their behalf in the procurement procedure, contract conclusion, and execution.
This form confirms the joint and several liability of joint bidders for the performance of the tender contract.
This form requires bidders to confirm full acceptance of all tender conditions, compliance with qualification criteria, proper completion of the cost proposal, and to declare any subcontractors, including their details and adherence to wage and exclusion criteria.
This document outlines the tender evaluation methodology, stating that for both the Narva and Kohtla-Järve projects, cost is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.
This document is an explanatory ESPD detailing the exclusion and qualification conditions for AS HOOLEKANDETEENUSED's open tender "Design and construction works for residential buildings – in Narva and Kohtla Järve," aiming to design and build suitable residential buildings for special care services.
No summary available for this document.
This tender involves the design and construction of two energy-efficient residential buildings for AS Hoolekandeteenused in Narva and Kohtla-Järve, including permit acquisition and coordination of other contractors.
This document is a draft construction contract outlining the terms and definitions of the agreement between AS Hoolekandeteenused and the contractor for the design and construction of residential buildings in Narva and Kohtla-Järve.
AS Hoolekandeteenused invites tenders for the design and construction of residential buildings in Narva and Kohtla-Järve, detailing the tender's division into parts, financing, and general participation conditions.
No summary available for this document.
No summary available for this document.
No summary available for this document.
No summary available for this document.
No summary available for this document.
No summary available for this document.
No summary available for this document.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for the design and construction of residential buildings demonstrates good clarity and fairness, utilizing e-procurement and transparent evaluation criteria. However, it presents notable issues with an incorrect CPV code and some ambiguity in procedure type, alongside a moderate focus on broader sustainability aspects beyond energy efficiency.
The tender provides a reasonable submission deadline and utilizes the ESPD, indicating compliance with EU regulations. However, the assigned CPV code '5868' is incorrect and not an 8-digit standard, which is a significant legal compliance issue. The procedure type 'E (Code: N/A)' and 'A (Code: N/A)' are also not standard, though 'E' likely refers to an Open procedure.
The project description is clear and unambiguous, detailing the scope of design and construction for energy-efficient residential buildings. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as the lowest price, and performance conditions (330 days) are well-defined. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and clearly structured.
All essential basic information, estimated value, and key deadlines are provided. Numerous documents are attached, covering various aspects of the tender. While the project duration is clear, the overall contract duration beyond project completion is not explicitly stated in the basic information. The inability to analyze all attached technical documents (due to file formats) limits a full assessment of detailed completeness, though the tender itself appears to contain them.
The tender demonstrates high fairness with full document access via e-procurement, disclosed value, and reasonable deadlines. The evaluation criteria (lowest price) are objective and transparent. The requirement for a general contractor is justified by the complexity and warranty considerations, and does not appear tailored to a specific company.
Electronic submission is fully supported, enhancing practicality. The project duration is clearly specified. However, detailed financing information is not explicitly available in the basic tender overview, and the contract start date is implied rather than a fixed or clearly defined timeframe.
Key dates are logical and consistent, and there are no detected disputes or suspensions. However, the incorrect CPV code and the non-standard/ambiguous procedure type codes represent significant inconsistencies in the structured data.
The tender explicitly identifies as 'Green Procurement' and emphasizes 'energy-efficient' buildings, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks explicit social criteria for bidders or contract performance, and there is no stated focus on innovation. The project is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required