Purchase of a license for forensic multimedia file investigation software or software suite
ClosedKey facts
- Estimated value
- €40,000
- Deadline
- Expired
- CPV Code
- 48900000-7 — Miscellaneous software package and computer systems
- Procedure
- Simplified procedure
Original Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
12 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
7 documents available with AI summaries
Bidders must confirm compliance with all tender conditions, including offer validity and location requirements, and provide essential administrative data for contract signing and identification of representatives for exclusion checks.
The tender will be evaluated solely based on the total cost of the offer (excluding taxes), with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.
Companies must confirm they are not subject to the exclusion grounds specified in § 95 (1) of the Public Procurement Act and are prepared to submit remedial measures if required.
This document outlines the simplified procurement procedure and general conditions for purchasing forensic multimedia file analysis software licenses, including submission requirements and qualification criteria.
This document is a draft procurement contract for the purchase of a license for forensic multimedia file investigation software, outlining contract performance terms, license activation, validity, acceptance, defect resolution, penalties, and the supplier's obligation to be the manufacturer or an authorized reseller.
This document outlines the technical requirements for forensic multimedia file investigation software or a software suite for three users, which must enable the analysis, enhancement, conversion, authentication, manipulation detection, and reporting of audio, photo, and video files.
This document is a power of attorney form for joint bidders, confirming their joint submission, solidary liability, and appointing an official representative for the public procurement and contract signing.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender for forensic multimedia software is generally well-structured for a simplified procedure, with clear requirements and good transparency regarding access and value. However, it suffers from a notable inconsistency in evaluation criteria and lacks any sustainability considerations.
Score Breakdown
The tender demonstrates good compliance with national regulations for a simplified procedure, referencing the Public Procurement Act and providing a reasonable submission deadline. No disputes or suspensions are noted.
Requirements are generally clear and well-documented, including technical specifications and performance conditions. However, there is a minor contradiction between the stated 'relative_weighting' characteristic and the explicit 'lowest price' evaluation criterion, which introduces slight ambiguity.
Most essential information, including basic details, financial data, and deadlines, is provided. A comprehensive set of documents is attached. However, specific location information beyond the NUTS code is missing, and some key documents like evaluation criteria and the draft contract are not explicitly marked as 'Required'.
The tender offers full document access, discloses the estimated value, and utilizes e-procurement for equal access. Evaluation criteria (lowest price) are objective. The requirement for the supplier to be a manufacturer or authorized reseller is common for specialized software and does not appear to be tailored.
Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. While the contract start date is not provided, this is common for tenders. The absence of an explicit document URL is a minor concern, though implied by e-procurement.
A significant inconsistency exists between the 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' characteristic and the explicit statement that 'The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score'. This contradiction reduces data consistency.
The tender explicitly lacks green procurement, social criteria, and innovation focus, as indicated by automated checks. While it is EU-funded, this does not translate into specific sustainability requirements within the tender itself.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required