Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of Akips software license and product support

Open
Deadline
31 days left
June 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
311336
Value
€90,000
Location
Estonia
Published
May 29, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

May 29, 2026

Deadline for Questions

June 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

June 30, 2026

Tender Opening

June 30, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€90,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€153,114
Avg. Bids
2.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
91%
374 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of this procurement procedure is the purchase of Akips software license and product support for the University of Tartu for 3 (three) years in accordance with the technical specification provided in Annex 1 of the procurement documents. The procurement contract enters into force upon signing and is valid until June 7, 2029.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on extending the existing Akips software license and support for the University of Tartu. The primary evaluation criterion is cost, making a competitive price essential. Differentiation can be achieved through demonstrating superior understanding of the client's existing infrastructure and offering value-added services beyond the minimum requirements.

Key Winning Messages

Your trusted partner for seamless Akips continuity and enhanced network monitoring.

Cost-effective Akips solution with proven expertise and value-added support.

Key Opportunities
Leverage existing Akips knowledge and client relationship.
Offer value-added services beyond basic support.
Highlight cost-effectiveness and long-term value.
Demonstrate understanding of academic IT environments.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation.

Focus on lean operational costs, efficient service delivery, and explore potential volume discounts or bundled offerings to present the most aggressive price possible without compromising quality.

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria beyond cost.

Ensure absolute compliance with all stated requirements and proactively address any potential ambiguities in the bid. Focus on clear, concise documentation that leaves no room for interpretation.

Potential for new entrants or aggressive pricing from existing Akips partners.

Emphasize unique selling propositions beyond price, such as superior technical expertise, faster response times, or a deeper understanding of the client's specific Akips configuration.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established software vendor or reseller with a proven track record in providing Akips software and support, ideally with prior experience working with academic institutions. They should possess strong technical support capabilities and a clear understanding of the client's current Akips deployment.
Key Requirements
Akips Network Monitor software license for 3 years
Product support via email and phone
Regular online training (webinars)
Development of additional functionalities (e.g., vendor-specific MIB objects and reports)
Assistance with system integration using Akips API and Site Scripting
New and compliant software
Bid validity for at least 3 months
Acceptance of contract terms
No conflict of interest
Compliance with sanctions (no Russian Federation ties)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated expertise in Akips integration with existing university IT infrastructure.
Proactive proposals for Akips feature enhancements or optimization tailored to academic use cases.
Exceptional responsiveness and proactive communication regarding support and training.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to providing training materials in accessible formats (e.g., captioned videos) to support diverse learning needs within the university.
Bid Focus Areas
Pakkumuse kogumaksumus (eurot, käibemaksuta)100%

Submit the absolute lowest possible price that is still profitable and sustainable. Thoroughly review all cost components to identify any areas for reduction without sacrificing quality or compliance. Consider offering tiered pricing for support levels if feasible and compliant.

Recommendations6
Ensure Absolute Compliance with Akips Licensing and Support
CriticalLow effort

Verify that the proposed Akips license is for the correct version and includes all specified functionalities. Confirm that the product support meets the email and phone requirements and that the support team is adequately staffed and trained.

Avoids immediate disqualification.
Aggressively Price for 100% Cost Evaluation
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% cost weighting, the bid must be exceptionally competitive. Conduct a thorough cost analysis to identify all potential savings and present the lowest feasible price. This may involve optimizing internal processes or leveraging existing agreements.

Maximizes chances of winning based on the primary evaluation criterion.
Propose Value-Added Functionality Development and Integration Support
HighMed effort

Go beyond the basic requirements by detailing how you can proactively develop specific MIB objects or reports relevant to a university environment. Clearly articulate your expertise in using Akips API and Site Scripting for seamless integration, potentially offering a free initial consultation or assessment.

Adds perceived value beyond price, making the bid more attractive.
Clarify Existing Akips Configuration and Needs
HighMed effort

If possible, seek clarification (via the eRHR system) on the current Akips server ID, license details, and any specific challenges or desired improvements the University of Tartu has experienced. This information can inform more tailored proposals.

Enables a more precise and persuasive bid.
Strictly Adhere to All Declarations and Compliance Requirements
CriticalLow effort

Pay meticulous attention to all declarations, especially regarding sanctions and conflicts of interest. Ensure all required documentation, including the Hankepass and any power of attorney, is correctly completed and submitted.

Prevents disqualification due to administrative or compliance errors.
Offer Flexible and Accessible Training Options
MediumLow effort

While webinars are specified, consider offering recorded sessions or supplementary documentation to cater to different learning styles and schedules within the university. This demonstrates a commitment to user adoption and success.

Enhances client satisfaction and perceived value.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective yet technically proficient provider of Akips solutions for academic institutions. Emphasize a deep understanding of the client's existing setup and a commitment to long-term partnership, not just a transactional sale.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Basic Requirements

  • Specific performance conditions apply

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
311336_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.9 KB

No summary available for this document.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
311336_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.2 KB

No summary available for this document.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
311336_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 64.3 KB

No summary available for this document.

Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseksPDF
Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseks.pdf -- 127.1 KB

No summary available for this document.

Lisa 1.1. Maksumuse esitamise vormXLS
Lisa 11 Maksumuse esitamise vorm.xlsx -- 62.5 KB

No summary available for this document.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 99.0 KB

No summary available for this document.

Lisa 2 - 3 (vormid)DOC
Lisa 2 - 3 (vormid).docx -- 30.4 KB

No summary available for this document.

Lisa 4 Hankelepingu kavandPDF
Lisa 4 Hankelepingu kavand.pdf -- 189.0 KB

No summary available for this document.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek - nõuded pakkujale ja pakkumusele (73)PDF
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek - nõuded pakkuj... -- 183.3 KB

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

Quality Score

Comprehensive quality analysis of this tender scoring legal compliance, clarity, completeness, fairness, practicality, data consistency, and sustainability on a 0-100 scale with detailed breakdown and recommendations.

Login

Add to Pipeline