Skip to main content
Tenders

Incontinence Pads

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
306976
Value
€239,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 11, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost for Lot 1 as presented in the Cost Form, cell M12.100%
Total bid cost for Lot 2 as presented in the Cost Form, cell M13.100%
Total bid cost for Lot 3 as presented in the Cost Form, cell M14.100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€239,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€92,792
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
3,220 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of incontinence pads in accordance with the tender notice and tender documents.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (5)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must submit the Hankepass.
--Bidders must submit the completed cost form.
--Bidders must submit the technical description.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated in provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must provide a Hankepass (self-declaration) as initial proof instead of certificates from authorities or third parties.
--Bidders must provide contact details.
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender document conditions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must submit a detailed technical description of the offered incontinence products.
--The technical description must include confirmations of compliance with sterility, CE marking, materials, and dimensions.
--Bidders must submit product samples.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must complete the cost form.
--The total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion with a 100% weighting.
--The cost form requires filling in specified columns, indicating unit and package costs with precision up to two decimal places.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306976_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 31.2 KB

Bidders must submit compliance conditions, confirming acceptance of tender document terms, provide contact details, complete the cost form and technical specification, and submit product samples.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 25.8 KB

Bidders must provide a detailed technical description of the incontinence slings offered, including confirmations of compliance with sterility, CE marking, materials, and dimensions, and submit samples and a local representative.

Lisa 2 Maksumuse vormXLS
Lisa 2 Maksumuse vorm.xlsx -- 14.9 KB

The bidder must submit the cost form, filling in the specified columns and indicating the unit and package cost with a precision of up to two decimal places, to evaluate bids based on the lowest estimated cost.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306976_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.9 KB

The tender document outlines the evaluation criteria for the incontinence sling tender, where the total bid price is the sole evaluation criterion with a 100% weight.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306976_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.8 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected response format.

Lisa 3 Raamlepingu projektDOC
Lisa 3 Raamlepingu projekt.docx -- 47.1 KB

This framework agreement outlines the terms under which the supplier will provide incontinence products to Ida-Tallinna Central Hospital, emphasizing the supplier's professionalism and necessary experience.

RHAD üldosaDOC
RHAD üldosa.docx -- 39.5 KB

This general part outlines the tender documents for the incontinence sling procurement by Ida-Tallinna Central Hospital, including the tender notice, technical specification, cost form, and draft framework agreement, dividing the tender into three lots.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for incontinence slings is generally well-structured with clear technical and submission requirements. However, it lacks explicit mention of contract duration and sustainability aspects, and the sole reliance on price as an evaluation criterion might be a concern for quality-focused procurement.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The use of Hankepass (ESPD) is a standard practice. The absence of explicit contract duration is a minor omission.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-defined. Technical specifications and submission forms are specified. The evaluation criterion (price) is clearly stated, although its sole weighting could be a point of discussion.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value and deadlines. However, the contract duration is not explicitly specified, which is a notable omission. The tender documents are listed and mostly accessible.

Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. Access to documents is provided. The use of Hankepass (ESPD) is a standard and fair approach. The sole reliance on price as the evaluation criterion is objective but may not capture all aspects of value.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a URL for the e-procurement platform is provided. Financing information is not detailed, and the contract start date is not specified. The duration of the contract is also missing, impacting practical planning.

Missing contract start date
Missing contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical. The AI-extracted requirements align with the provided document summaries.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical and submission requirements
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Use of Hankepass (ESPD) for eligibility
Well-defined CPV code and reference number

Concerns

Sole evaluation criterion is price
Missing contract duration
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating additional evaluation criteria beyond price to ensure best value.
2. Specify the contract duration and start date for better planning.
3. Integrate sustainability or social value criteria where applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline