Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Printing of Mustamäe district newspaper 01.05.2026 – 30.06.2027

Closed

Updated October 12, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306887
Value
€50,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 06, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of printing the newspaper100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 24, 2026

Tender Opening

March 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€50,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
79800000-2 — Printing and related services
Procedure
Simplified procedure
Budget
€50,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€100,264
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
87%
624 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Printing of the Mustamäe district newspaper from 01.05.2026 to 30.06.2027 in accordance with the terms of the contract draft and the technical description of the procurement documents.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Mustamäe district newspaper printing is heavily price-driven, making cost optimization the primary success factor. Bidders must demonstrate robust financial health and operational efficiency to secure the contract. While social value and innovation are not explicitly requested, demonstrating a commitment to local engagement and quality can provide a competitive edge.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and reliable printing solution for the Mustamäe district newspaper.

Guaranteed quality and timely delivery of the Mustamäe district newspaper within budget.

A committed local partner ensuring the continued publication of the Mustamäe district newspaper.

Key Opportunities
Leverage economies of scale and efficient production to offer the lowest price.
Demonstrate operational efficiency and streamlined processes to justify competitive pricing.
Highlight local presence or commitment to the Mustamäe district to build rapport, even if not a formal requirement.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all cost drivers, and explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising quality or delivery. Consider bulk purchasing of materials and optimizing production schedules.

Potential for low profit margins if not priced strategically.

Develop a detailed cost model that accounts for all direct and indirect costs, including overheads and a reasonable profit margin. Benchmark against similar contracts if possible.

Ensuring full compliance with all technical and submission requirements to avoid disqualification.

Dedicate a team to meticulously review all tender documents, including technical specifications and contract terms. Conduct internal reviews and quality checks on all submitted documents before the deadline.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A printing company with proven experience in local newspaper production, possessing efficient production processes, strong supply chain management for paper and ink, and a lean operational structure. They should have a solid financial standing to offer competitive pricing and a track record of reliable delivery. Experience with public sector contracts is beneficial but not essential if cost and quality are superior.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of turnover in printing works for 2024-2025 (Annex 3)
Submission of bid cost form (Annex 2)
Compliance with technical requirements in Hanke üldandmed ja tehniline kirjeldus
Adherence to contract project terms (Lisa 5 Lepingu projekt.docx)
Completion of Hankepass (ESPD)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrating a clear understanding of the local community's needs and preferences for the newspaper's quality and distribution.
Offering a slightly more flexible delivery schedule or additional value-added services (e.g., digital archiving, specific paper stock options) that don't significantly increase cost but enhance perceived value.
A strong track record of delivering similar publications on time and within budget, supported by references (if permissible).
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to sourcing paper from sustainably managed forests or using recycled paper content where feasible, even if not mandated, to align with broader sustainability trends and demonstrate corporate responsibility.
Bid Focus Areas
Total cost of printing the newspaper100.0%

Achieve the lowest possible price by optimizing production processes, negotiating favorable supplier contracts for materials (paper, ink), and minimizing overheads. Conduct a thorough cost breakdown to ensure all expenses are accounted for and a competitive yet profitable price is offered.

Recommendations7
Aggressively Optimize Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weighting on cost, conduct a granular cost analysis to identify all possible cost-saving measures in production, material sourcing, and logistics. Aim to be the lowest bidder while ensuring a sustainable profit margin.

Directly impacts the bid's competitiveness and likelihood of winning.
Meticulously Complete Hankepass (ESPD)
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the Hankepass is fully and accurately completed, serving as the primary self-declaration. Pay close attention to all sections and required information formats as specified by the contracting authority.

Failure to complete correctly will lead to disqualification.
Thoroughly Review Technical Specifications and Contract
CriticalMed effort

Scrutinize the 'Hanke üldandmed ja tehniline kirjeldus' and 'Lisa 5 Lepingu projekt' to fully understand all technical requirements, deadlines, and contractual obligations. Ensure your production capabilities and proposed solution align perfectly.

Ensures a compliant bid and avoids post-contractual issues.
Confirm Financial Turnover (Annex 3)
HighLow effort

Accurately complete and submit Annex 3, confirming the required printing works turnover for 2024-2025. Ensure the figures are verifiable and meet the contracting authority's expectations.

Essential eligibility criterion; non-compliance leads to disqualification.
Detail Subcontractor Information (Annex 4)
HighMed effort

If subcontractors are to be used, meticulously complete Annex 4 with all required details (names, registration codes, representatives, nature of work, volume). Ensure subcontractors are reliable and cost-effective.

Crucial for eligibility and demonstrating capacity if relying on third parties.
Highlight Local Engagement (Optional but Recommended)
MediumLow effort

While not a formal requirement, subtly emphasize any local presence, local workforce utilization, or understanding of the Mustamäe district's community to build rapport and a sense of partnership.

Can create a positive perception and differentiate from purely price-focused competitors.
Propose Sustainable Material Options
LowLow effort

Include a statement about the potential to use recycled paper or paper from sustainably managed forests, even if not explicitly required. This demonstrates forward-thinking and corporate responsibility.

Enhances brand image and aligns with potential future procurement trends.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider without compromising on essential quality and delivery. Emphasize operational efficiency and lean processes as the drivers of this competitive pricing. Highlight reliability and a proven track record of timely delivery to counter any perception that low price means low quality.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--The Hankepass is the entrepreneur's own confirmation, serving as initial proof instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.
--The ESPD_v2.0_laiendatud.xml file format is not supported for AI analysis.
--The document "vastavustingimused.pdf" explains the power of attorney for joint bidders, rules for marking trade secrets, and conditions for submitting a bid, which are necessary to participate in the tender for printing the Mustamäe district newspaper.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority has not divided the procurement into parts, as otherwise the performance of the procurement contract would become excessively complex and costly, and there is a high probability that the proper performance of the procurement contract would be hindered due to the lack of coordination of the activities of several different contractors (RHS § 27 para 2).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must confirm their turnover in printing works for the years 2024-2025 using the provided form (Annex 3).
--If the bidder plans to use subcontractors for the performance of the procurement contract, they must provide their names, registration codes, representatives, nature of work, and volume using the provided form (Annex 4).
--The bidder must submit the form "Annex 2 Riigihanke pakkumuse maksumuse esildise vorm" to declare the cost of their bid for providing the printing service for the Mustamäe district newspaper.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tender document contains the technical requirements for printing the Mustamäe district newspaper and general tender data necessary for submitting a bid.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid evaluation will be based solely on the total cost of printing the newspaper, with the lowest price receiving the maximum weighting.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306887_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.4 KB

This document outlines requirements for joint bidder power of attorney, business secret designation, and tender submission procedures for the Mustamäe district newspaper printing tender.

Lisa 2 Riigihanke pakkumuse maksumuse esildise vormDOC
Lisa 2 Riigihanke pakkumuse maksumuse esildis... -- 14.0 KB

Bidders must submit the form "Appendix 2 Tender Cost Submission Form" to declare their bid cost for providing the printing service of the Mustamäe district newspaper.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306887_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.5 KB

The tender evaluation is based solely on the total cost of printing the newspaper, where the lowest price receives the maximum weighting.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306887_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 36.5 KB

The tender pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

Hanke üldandmed ja tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Hanke üldandmed ja tehniline kirjeldus.doc -- 97.0 KB

This tender document contains technical requirements and general tender information for the printing of the Mustamäe district newspaper, necessary for bid submission.

Lisa 3. Pakkuja kinnitus käibe kohtaDOC
Lisa 3 Pakkuja kinnitus käibe kohta.docx -- 17.8 KB

The bidder must confirm their turnover in printing services for the years 2024-2025 by submitting the designated form.

Lisa 4. Alltöövõtu kasutamise vormDOC
Lisa 4 Alltöövõtu kasutamise vorm.docx -- 13.6 KB

This form is required if the bidder intends to use subcontractors for the execution of the contract, detailing their names, registration codes, representatives, nature of work, and volume.

Lisa 5. Lepingu projektDOC
Lisa 5 Lepingu projekt.docx -- 40.1 KB

This document outlines the draft contract terms for the printing service of the Mustamäe district newspaper, detailing the contract subject, payment, scope of work, deadlines, and acceptance procedures.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for printing the Mustamäe district newspaper is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies on specific forms that might require bidders to adapt their existing documentation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. No disputes are noted. The justification for not dividing the tender into parts is provided, referencing relevant legislation.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the technical requirements are referenced in the tender documents. Evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, with price being the sole factor. Conditions for submission are detailed in 'vastavustingimused.pdf'.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the 'Tender Valid' duration of 2 months is relatively short given the submission and opening dates, potentially creating a tight window for contract finalization. The contract project document is not marked as required, which could be a point of omission.

•Tender validity period (2 months) might be tight given submission/opening dates.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. Evaluation is based on objective criteria (lowest price). Access to documents is provided. The use of specific forms like 'Hankepass' and 'Annex 3' and 'Annex 4' requires bidders to conform to the contracting authority's format, which is standard but can add administrative burden.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are specified. A document URL is not explicitly provided for all documents, but they are listed. The contract start date is clear. Financing information is not detailed, and the duration is specified as a period. The reliance on specific forms (Annexes) adds a layer of administrative work for bidders.

•Financing information is not detailed.
•Reliance on specific forms (Annexes) requires bidders to adapt their documentation.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

•No green procurement criteria.
•No social responsibility criteria.

Strengths

Clear description of service and technical requirements.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
E-procurement and e-submission facilitated.
Well-defined legal and procedural framework.

Concerns

Lack of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Reliance on specific, potentially non-standard, submission forms.
Short tender validity period.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate sustainability criteria into the evaluation process.
2. Consider providing templates or more flexibility for bidder-submitted forms.
3. Review and potentially extend the tender validity period.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes