Tenders

Accounting service 2026-2030

Open
Deadline
14 days left
March 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306783
Value
€156,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 27, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of the bid70%
Service availability for the contracting authority20%
Length of public accounting experience in years10%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 16, 2026

Tender Opening

March 16, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€156,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€100,264
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
87%
624 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Conclusion of a procurement contract for the provision of accounting services for Metrosert AS.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

91 requirements across 10 categories

Submission (77)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (4)
Technical (6)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
--Information regarding business secrets must be provided.
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on total cost (70%), service availability (20%), and public accounting experience (10%).
ESITAMISE NOUDED72
--Pakkujad peavad kinnitama, et nad ei kaasata alltöövõtjaid ega tarnijaid, kes on seotud Venemaa Föderatsiooniga.
--Ärisaladuse kohta tuleb esitada teave.
--Pakkumusi hinnatakse peamiselt kogumaksumuse (70%), teenuse kättesaadavuse (20%) ja riigi raamatupidamise kogemuse (10%) alusel.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--At least 10 years of experience in accounting services.
--Average annual turnover of at least 300,000 EUR.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Experience in accounting services for the public sector.
--Capability to manage the transition to Odoo business software.
--Service availability.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the bid will be weighted at 70% in the evaluation.
KOHUSTUSLIKUD NOUDED1
--Pakkujad ei tohi kaasata alltöövõtjaid ega tarnijaid, kes on seotud Venemaa Föderatsiooniga.
VASTAVUSNOUDED2
--Vähemalt 10-aastane kogemus raamatupidamisteenuste osutamisel.
--Keskmine aastakäive vähemalt 300 000 eurot.
TEHNILISED NOUDED3
--Kogemus riigi raamatupidamise teenuste osutamisel.
--Võimekus hallata üleminekut Odoo äritarkvarale.
--Teenuse kättesaadavus.
FINANTSNOUDED1
--Pakkumuse kogumaksumus kaalub hindamisel 70%.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306783_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.9 KB

The bidder must confirm that they will not involve subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation in the contract execution and must provide information about trade secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306783_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.3 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on total cost (70%) and service availability and state accounting experience (30%), with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306783_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.1 KB

The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats, but is not intended for completion.

Hanke alusdokument_27.02.2026PDF
Hanke alusdokument_27022026.pdf -- 309.9 KB

Aktsiaselts Metrosert is seeking an accounting service provider for the period 2026-2030, requiring at least 10 years of experience and an average annual turnover of €300,000.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldus_27.02.2026PDF
Lisa 1 Hankedokument AS Metrosert_TEHNILINE K... -- 262.1 KB

Contracting authority Aktsiaselts Metrosert is seeking accounting services for the period 2026-2030, including a transition to the Odoo business software.

Lisa 2. Hankelepingu projekt_27.02.2026PDF
Lisa 2 Hankedokument AS Metrosert Hankeleping... -- 180.6 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the terms and obligations for accounting services for the period 2026-2030.

Lisa 3. Hindamiskriteeriumid_27.02.2026PDF
Lisa 3 Hankedokument AS Metrosert_HINDAMISKRI... -- 249.2 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the accounting services tender, with 70% weight on total cost, 20% on service availability, and 10% on state accounting experience.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for accounting services is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on price in its evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure type 'A' (Open procedure) is standard. No disputes are noted. The financing condition refers to attached documents, which is acceptable.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the requirements for experience, turnover, and technical capability are well-documented. The evaluation criteria are specified with relative weightings, contributing to clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key documents like the contract draft, technical specifications, and evaluation criteria are referenced. However, the financing condition relies on attached documents, and some document formats (.xml, .ods) are not directly analyzable.

Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. The criteria are objective, with a strong emphasis on price (70%). The exclusion of bidders linked to the Russian Federation is a geopolitical consideration rather than company-specific tailoring. The requirement for 10 years of experience and a high turnover might be restrictive but are standard for such services.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. The contract start date is specified. Financing is linked to attached documents. The duration is clearly stated. However, the reliance on attached documents for financing details and the lack of direct links to all tender documents could slightly hinder immediate access.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening, contract start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria
Absence of social responsibility considerations

Strengths

Clear and specific technical and eligibility requirements
Well-defined evaluation criteria with weightings
Electronic submission and e-procurement platform usage
Logical and consistent timeline

Concerns

Limited sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation)
Heavy reliance on price in evaluation (70%)
Some financing and document details are external to the main tender summary

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social clauses) into future tenders.
2. Consider diversifying evaluation criteria beyond a dominant price weighting to encourage quality and innovation.
3. Ensure all critical financing and contractual details are directly accessible within the primary tender documentation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline