Tenders

Maintenance of local roads in Tõrva municipality 2026/2027

Open
Deadline
7 days left
March 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306654
Value
€60,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 27, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Hourly cost of road grading100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 09, 2026

Tender Opening

March 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€60,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Grading of gravel roads in Tõrva municipality approximately 4 times a year.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--If the Bidder discovers errors, contradictions, or inaccuracies in the tender documents during the preparation of the bid, they are obliged to inform the contracting authority immediately.
--Failure to submit written questions for clarification and additional information during the tender procedure will result in the contracting authority not accepting any subsequent claims or additional requirements from the Bidder, even from a successful Bidder during the performance of the contract, arising from the Bidder's assessment that the tender documents are contradictory or that the Bidder has not received the necessary explanatory or additional information from the contracting authority.
--In such cases, the contracting authority has the right to choose the interpretation of the tender documents that is more suitable for the contracting authority in the event of disputes arising during the performance of the contract. The chosen interpretation is mandatory for the Bidder to fulfill.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove the absence of grounds for exclusion.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must prove compliance with average wage requirements.
--Bidders must have MTR registration in the field of road construction.
--Bidders must provide data of at least two previous contracts.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must provide machines and equipment necessary for grading gravel roads.
--Machines and equipment for grading gravel roads must not be older than 15 years.
--Bidders must agree to the installation of a GPS device.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit the cost according to the structure provided in the "Evaluation Criteria and Indicators" worksheet.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306654_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 76.9 KB

The Tõrva Municipal Government requires all subcontractors to meet the qualification and suitability requirements set forth in the tender documents and to provide necessary data for the contracting authority's verification.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306654_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.0 KB

Bidders must confirm that their bid meets all conditions set forth in the tender documents and submit the cost according to the structure provided on the "Evaluation Criteria and Indicators to be Assessed" worksheet.

Pakkuja kinnitusDOC
Lisa 1_pakkuja kinnitused.doc -- 29.5 KB

The bidder must submit a confirmation demonstrating their compliance with tender conditions and qualification requirements.

Vorm 1 Kasutatavate masinate ja seadmete loeteluDOC
Vorm 1 masinate loetelu.docx -- 16.0 KB

The bidder must submit Form 1, listing the machinery and equipment to be used, including ownership or usage rights, registration numbers, and technical specifications.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306654_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The tender evaluation criteria focus on the hourly cost of road grading, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306654_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 8.0 KB

Bidders must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds, meet average wage requirements, possess MTR registration in road construction, have necessary machinery for gravel road grading, and submit data for at least two previous contracts.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus_2026_2027.docx -- 13.6 KB

Bidders must provide gravel road grading machinery and equipment no older than 15 years, as per the technical description, and agree to the installation of a GPS device.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for local road maintenance in Tõrva municipality is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could benefit from more detailed financial information.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope of the tender. No disputes are noted. The procedure is standard for local procurement.

Clarity80/100

The description of services (gravel road grading) is clear. Requirements are documented across several AI-extracted sections and tender documents. Evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, with price being the primary factor.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the 'Value Classified: Yes' without further detail could be more transparent. The financing source is not explicitly stated.

Financing source not explicitly stated.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for electronic submission and e-procurement, promoting accessibility. Objective criteria are used for evaluation (price). Deadlines are reasonable. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair process.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. A document URL is not explicitly provided in the basic information but is implied by the document list. The contract start date is not specified, only the duration. Financing information is missing.

Contract start date not specified.
Financing information missing.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The tender status is '11', indicating it is active and proceeding.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which often implies certain sustainability standards. The age limit for machinery (15 years) could be seen as a minor environmental consideration, but it's not framed as such.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear description of services.
Mandatory electronic submission and e-procurement.
Reasonable deadlines and contract duration.
Objective evaluation criteria (price-based).

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria.
Missing contract start date and financing details.
Potential for ambiguity in document interpretation if questions are not raised.

Recommendations

1. Include specific sustainability goals or criteria.
2. Clarify the contract start date and source of financing.
3. Ensure all tender documents are easily accessible via a direct URL.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline