Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

A-terminali kvartali arheoloogiliste eeluuringute tegemine

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
306547
Value
€80,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 16, 2026

Tender Opening

March 16, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€80,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Riigihanke esemeks on Vanasadamas A-terminali kvartali arheoloogiliste eeluuringute tegemine. Tehniline kirjeldus on esitatud RHADi lisas 1.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

60%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for archaeological pre-surveys at the A-terminal block of the Old Port requires a technically competent and cost-effective bid. Focus on demonstrating deep archaeological expertise, efficient methodology, and a clear understanding of the site's historical significance to secure this contract.

Key Winning Messages

Expertise in urban archaeological pre-surveys ensuring minimal disruption and maximum data recovery.

Cost-effective and efficient methodology tailored to the specific needs of the A-terminal block.

Commitment to high-quality archaeological standards and timely delivery.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for strategic emphasis on technical merit and value.
Green procurement requirement offers a chance to differentiate through sustainable practices.
Potential for subcontracting allows bidders to leverage specialized expertise if needed.
Key Challenges
Absence of detailed evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid scoring.

Assume a balanced weighting between technical and price, and prioritize demonstrating superior technical capability and value for money. Proactively address all potential evaluation areas.

Limited information on the technical specification (Lisa 1) due to file format.

Request clarification from the contracting authority regarding the technical description or make reasonable assumptions based on the CPV code and project description, clearly stating these assumptions in the bid.

Low estimated value may attract highly competitive, price-sensitive bids.

Focus on demonstrating efficiency and cost-effectiveness without compromising quality. Highlight any economies of scale or streamlined processes.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A specialized archaeological survey company with a proven track record in urban archaeological pre-investigations, particularly in port or industrial environments. The ideal bidder will possess experienced archaeologists, appropriate survey equipment, and a robust quality management system, capable of delivering within a tight timeframe and budget.
Key Requirements
Detailed technical proposal for archaeological pre-surveys (Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus)
Compliance with procurement procedures (RHAD Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek)
Understanding and adherence to contract terms (Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt)
Demonstrated ability to meet qualification criteria, potentially using subcontractors (Lisa 3 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusolek kvalifitseerimise tingimusele tuginemisel)
Green procurement considerations
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience with similar port or urban development archaeological projects.
Innovative yet practical methodologies for pre-surveys that minimize site disturbance.
A strong team of experienced archaeologists with specific expertise relevant to the historical context of the A-terminal block.
A clear and well-articulated approach to green procurement that goes beyond basic compliance.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to employing local archaeologists or trainees where possible, contributing to local skill development.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Proposal (Methodology, Team, Equipment)

Provide a highly detailed, practical, and efficient methodology for the archaeological pre-surveys. Showcase the qualifications and experience of the proposed team, emphasizing relevant expertise. Detail the equipment to be used, ensuring it is state-of-the-art and appropriate for the task. Clearly link the methodology to the specific requirements of the A-terminal block site.

Price

Develop a competitive and realistic price. While the estimated value is low, avoid underbidding to the point of compromising quality or profitability. Clearly itemize costs and demonstrate value for money through efficiency and expertise.

Green Procurement

Outline specific measures to minimize environmental impact during the survey, such as waste reduction, responsible material disposal, and efficient energy use of equipment. This demonstrates proactive engagement with the requirement.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Analyze Technical Specification (Lisa 1)
CriticalHigh effort

Despite the file format limitation, make every effort to obtain and meticulously analyze 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus'. If direct analysis is impossible, request clarification from the contracting authority or make well-reasoned assumptions and clearly state them in the bid.

Ensures the bid directly addresses all technical requirements, avoiding disqualification and demonstrating understanding.
Develop a Robust Technical Solution
CriticalHigh effort

Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, assume technical merit will be heavily weighted. Propose a detailed, efficient, and scientifically sound methodology for the archaeological pre-surveys, highlighting experience with similar sites and challenges.

Maximizes scoring in the technical evaluation, a likely key differentiator.
Highlight Relevant Experience and Expertise
HighMed effort

Showcase specific experience in urban archaeological pre-surveys, particularly in port or industrial areas. Detail the qualifications and experience of the proposed archaeological team, emphasizing any specific knowledge of the historical context of Tallinn's Old Port.

Builds confidence in the bidder's capability and sets them apart from less specialized competitors.
Optimize Pricing for Value
HighMed effort

While the estimated value is modest, develop a competitive price that reflects the proposed methodology's efficiency and the team's expertise. Avoid aggressive underbidding that could compromise quality or raise suspicions about feasibility.

Balances competitiveness with profitability and perceived value.
Integrate Green Procurement Commitments
MediumLow effort

Detail specific, actionable steps for green procurement, such as waste management plans, use of eco-friendly materials, and energy efficiency measures during fieldwork. This demonstrates proactive engagement with the tender's sustainability aspect.

Addresses a stated requirement and can be a positive differentiator.
Address Potential Information Gaps Proactively
HighMed effort

If clarification on 'Lisa 1' or other documents is not feasible, clearly state any assumptions made in the bid. This demonstrates due diligence and prevents potential misinterpretations.

Minimizes risk of bid rejection due to unmet assumptions.
Ensure Full Compliance with RHAD and Contract Draft
HighMed effort

Meticulously review and adhere to all instructions in 'RHAD Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek' and ensure the bid aligns with the terms and conditions outlined in 'Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt'.

Prevents administrative disqualification and ensures legal and contractual soundness.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as offering the best combination of specialized archaeological expertise, efficient methodology, and demonstrable value for money, rather than solely focusing on the lowest price. Emphasize the long-term benefits of a thorough and well-executed pre-survey for the A-terminal block development.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Basic Requirements

  • Staff qualification documentation required
  • Specific performance conditions apply

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306547_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.0 KB

Tender document 'Vastavustingimused' in .PDF format (7,194 bytes).

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306547_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.4 KB

Tender document 'Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad' in .PDF format (4,519 bytes).

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306547_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 8.8 KB

Tender document 'Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimused' in .PDF format (8,996 bytes).

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusZIP
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus viitenr 306547.zip -- 3.1 MB

No summary available for this document.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektZIP
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt viitenr 306547.zi... -- 201.1 KB

No summary available for this document.

Lisa 3 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusolek kvalifitseerimise tingimusele tuginemi...DOC
Lisa 3 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusoleku vo... -- 24.2 KB

Tender document 'Lisa 3 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusolek kvalifitseerimise tingimusele tuginemisel' in .DOCX format (24,744 bytes).

Lisa 4 Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa 4 Ühispakkujate_volikiri viitenr 306547.... -- 16.3 KB

Tender document 'Lisa 4 Ühispakkujate volikiri' in .DOCX format (16,650 bytes).

RHAD Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
RHAD (lihthange) viitenr 306547.pdf -- 293.5 KB

Tender document 'RHAD Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek' in .PDF format (300,547 bytes).

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

Quality Score

Comprehensive quality analysis of this tender scoring legal compliance, clarity, completeness, fairness, practicality, data consistency, and sustainability on a 0-100 scale with detailed breakdown and recommendations.

Login