Tenders

Catering services for Tallinn Muhu Kindergarten

Open
Deadline
1 days left
March 04, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Research
Reference
306479
Value
€250,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 18, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost per food day per child in kindergarten group (3 - 7 years)60%
Cost per food day per child in nursery group (1.5 - 3 years)40%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 04, 2026

Tender Opening

March 04, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€250,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Research
85
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€2,220,428
Avg. Bids
3.2
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
67%
182 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Food will be prepared in the kindergarten premises throughout the contract period (except for periods of group closure), on all working days. Submission of an offer is conditional on visiting the place of contract performance.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

19 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (4)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Completion and submission of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Submission of confirmation regarding anti-corruption activities.
--Submission of power of attorney if a joint bid.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Exclusion grounds as per the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Confirmation of anti-corruption activities.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Qualification conditions as per the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Submission of power of attorney for joint bids.
--Confirmation of bid compliance.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Ability to provide catering services to Tallinn Muhu Kindergarten as a unified whole, as the service is not divided into parts.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS4
--Completion of the cost structure.
--Submission of a price offer for staff lunch.
--Submission of unit prices for additional services, which must be valid for the entire contract period and cannot be 0 or negative.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306479_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.0 KB

This document outlines the conditions for submitting a tender, requiring bidders to confirm the absence of corrupt acts, the existence of a power of attorney for joint bids, compliance of the bid with terms, adherence to the cost structure, and the identification of any business secrets.

Lisa 3_Lisateenuste hinnakiriDOC
Lisa 3_Lisateenuste hinnakiri.docx -- 16.8 KB

This is a price list for additional services, requiring bidders to submit unit prices for various kindergarten event-related extra services, emphasizing that prices must be valid throughout the contract period and cannot be zero or negative.

Lisa 4_Personali lõunasöögi hinnapakkumusDOC
Lisa 4_Personali lõunasöögi hinnapakkumus.doc... -- 15.5 KB

This document is a price offer form for submitting the cost and order details for staff lunch.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306479_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.2 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria and methodology for bids for catering services at Tallinn Muhu Kindergarten, focusing on the cost per food day for nursery and kindergarten children with respective weightings.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306479_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 37.4 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's qualification conditions and exclusion grounds, but it is not intended for submission itself.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

85
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender is well-structured and transparent, featuring clear requirements and evaluation criteria. While it explicitly includes green procurement, it lacks social and innovation aspects, and the inability to analyze all provided documents is a minor limitation for a full content review.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with a clearly defined simplified procedure, appropriate CPV codes, and the use of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD). No disputes or suspensions are noted, and the reference to national procurement law (RHS) indicates adherence to local regulations.

Clarity90/100

The tender is highly clear and unambiguous. The description of the service, the requirement for a site visit, and the categorization of requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are well-articulated. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined with relative weightings.

Completeness80/100

Most essential information, including basic details, financial figures, timelines, and location, is comprehensively provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are well-defined. The inability to analyze two specific document formats (.xml and .asice) for this review is a minor limitation, but the documents themselves are listed as part of the tender.

Inability to analyze .xml and .asice document formats for a complete content review.
Fairness90/100

The tender exhibits strong fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, evaluation criteria are objective and transparent, and e-procurement is enabled, ensuring equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.

Practicality85/100

The tender is practical, supporting electronic submission and clearly stating the contract start date and duration. While a direct document URL isn't provided in the summary, it's implied by the e-procurement system. Financing details are limited to the estimated value.

Data Consistency95/100

Data consistency is excellent, with all key fields populated, no detected issues or disputes, and logical, consistent dates throughout the tender information.

Sustainability60/100

The tender explicitly includes "Green Procurement" characteristics, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks specific social criteria and an innovation focus, and is not EU-funded, which could otherwise drive higher sustainability standards.

No specific social criteria included.
No explicit innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear and comprehensive requirements and evaluation criteria.
Strong legal compliance and transparency.
Support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
Explicit inclusion of Green Procurement.
Consistent and logical data.

Concerns

Lack of specific social criteria in the tender.
Absence of an explicit innovation focus.
Inability to analyze all provided document formats (.xml, .asice) for a complete content review.

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating specific social clauses or criteria in future tenders to enhance social sustainability.
2. Explore opportunities to encourage innovation in service delivery or product offerings.
3. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in universally accessible and machine-readable formats for comprehensive review.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline