Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login25 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
19 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the general conditions for tender submission, including requirements for confirming tender compliance, power of attorney for joint bidders, designation of business secrets, and the structure for presenting the tender cost.
This form allows bidders to declare specific information within their tender submission as a business secret, providing justification for its confidentiality while adhering to restrictions on what cannot be marked as such.
Tender document 'Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus_RTU2026' in .PDF format (380,713 bytes).
This document is a CV form for a project manager, requiring information on education and previous experience in managing population-based projects to assess the bidder's team competence.
This is a power of attorney form for joint bidders, allowing one partner to authorize another to submit a tender and perform all procurement-related actions on their behalf.
This document is a power of attorney authorizing a designated individual to represent the bidder and sign the tender submission for the public procurement.
This document outlines the evaluation criteria and their weights for proposals, with 45% for the description of work, timeline, and team, 5% for adding a socioeconomic layer to the sample, and 50% for the cost.
This document serves as an explanatory guide for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) conditions and requirements, which companies must complete electronically to prove their qualification and compliance with the tender terms.
This document summarizes the market research conducted by the contracting authority among three potential bidders before the tender, covering submission deadlines, estimated costs, recruitment methods, and data management simplification.
This document describes the tender evaluation criteria, including the relevance of the work description, the addition of a socioeconomic layer to the sample, and cost, along with point distribution and scoring scales.
This document outlines the general terms and conditions for service contracts of the National Institute for Health Development, regulating the legal relationship, obligations, and work execution requirements between the client and the contractor.
This document details the structure and desired number of participants for the 2026 population nutrition survey sample, broken down by region, age group, and ethnicity.
This document outlines the detailed scheme and workflow for the 2026 population nutrition survey, including participant recruitment, data collection methods, informed consent processes, and data management.
This document is a contact management file that the contractor will use to manage participant data and survey progress for the 2026 population nutrition survey, filling in the blue-marked columns during the work.
This document is a notification letter describing the objectives, methodology, and participation conditions of the 2026 population nutrition survey for potential respondents.
This document is a sample consent form that the contracting authority expects to be used for recruiting participants in the 2026 population nutrition survey.
This document is a data processing agreement annex, outlining the authorized processor's obligations and rights regarding personal data processing in accordance with GDPR, forming an integral part of the procurement contract.
This document outlines the special conditions of the service contract, requiring the contractor to recruit 1200 participants for the national nutrition survey, ensuring sample representativeness and documenting the recruitment process.
This document outlines the general terms and conditions for the public procurement of recruiting participants for the 2026 national nutrition survey, including contracting authority details, estimated cost, funding, bidder eligibility, and business secret regulations.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender is well-documented and transparent regarding its scope and practical aspects, benefiting from EU funding and e-procurement. However, a critical inconsistency in the evaluation criteria weighting significantly compromises its clarity and fairness.
The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, utilizing the ESPD and being EU-funded, which implies adherence to higher standards. Deadlines are reasonable, and CPV codes are appropriate. A minor ambiguity exists regarding the procedure type ('A') combined with 'Negotiation Allowed', which could be clarified.
While the project description and performance conditions are clear, there is a critical inconsistency in the evaluation criteria weighting. The AI-extracted requirements list weights that sum to 145%, whereas the summaries of the evaluation criteria documents (Doc 3 and 7) suggest a 100% sum. This fundamental discrepancy creates significant ambiguity for bidders and severely impacts the clarity of the tender.
The tender is highly complete, providing all essential basic, financial, timeline, and classification information. A comprehensive set of 20 supporting documents is referenced, detailing requirements, criteria, and contractual terms, ensuring bidders have ample information.
The tender generally promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed estimated value, reasonable preparation time, and e-procurement. However, the critical inconsistency in evaluation criteria weighting directly impacts transparency and objectivity, thus reducing the fairness score. Market research among potential bidders is noted but not deemed to lead to tailoring without further evidence.
The tender is highly practical, supporting electronic submission and e-procurement. Key practical details such as the contract start date, duration, and financing information are clearly provided, facilitating bidder participation and planning.
All key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. The dates provided for reveal, submission, opening, and contract start are logical and consistent, indicating excellent data integrity.
While the tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards, it explicitly lacks specific criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. The 'socio-economic layer' is a technical requirement for the survey, not a social procurement criterion.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required