Tenders

Digital screens for Rae municipality schools

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
306128
Value
€25,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Tender Opening

March 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€25,000
Duration
3 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
77
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€104,435
Avg. Bids
2.5
Competition
Low
SME Winners
94%
311 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to acquire digital screens for Rae municipality schools.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (6)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Consider minimum technical, compatibility, certification, and warranty requirements in the offer.
--Consider specific technical requirements for 86-inch interactive digital screens (specifications, operating system, memory, connectivity, installation) in the offer.
--Mark business secrets in the offer according to law.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Do not involve sanctioned subcontractors or suppliers for more than 10% of the contract value.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--If submitting a joint bid, provide a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Meet minimum technical requirements for digital screens.
--Meet compatibility requirements for digital screens.
--Meet certification requirements for digital screens.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--(None explicitly stated in the provided summaries)

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306128_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.1 KB

Bidders must confirm they will not involve sanctioned subcontractors or suppliers for over 10% of the contract value, provide a power of attorney if submitting a joint bid, and declare business secrets in their offer according to legal requirements.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306128_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

Tender document 'Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad' in .PDF format (2,836 bytes).

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306128_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 36.1 KB

This document is an explanatory ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the qualification information expected from the economic operator, but it is not to be filled out directly, rather electronically.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 24.5 KB

Tender document 'Hankelepingu projekt' in .DOCX format (25,063 bytes).

Seadmete kirjeldusXLS
Seadmete kirjeldus.xlsx -- 12.5 KB

This document details the technical requirements and features for the 86-inch interactive digital screens to be procured for Rae municipality schools, including screen specifications, operating system, memory, connectivity, and installation.

Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Tehniline kirjeldus digiekraanid.pdf -- 139.5 KB

This document outlines the minimum technical, compatibility, certification, and warranty requirements for the digital screens to be supplied to Rae municipality schools, which bidders must consider in their proposals.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

77
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender demonstrates good clarity and legal compliance with well-defined technical requirements, but it is hampered by a data inconsistency regarding value classification and a complete absence of sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance90/100

The tender adheres well to legal requirements, featuring reasonable deadlines, clearly defined procedure types, appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD suggests compliance with EU/national regulations, and mandatory disclosures are met.

Clarity85/100

The tender's purpose is clearly stated, and AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and understandable, covering technical specifications, eligibility, and submission details. Evaluation criteria are mentioned, and relevant documents exist, contributing to overall clarity.

Completeness70/100

While basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are specified, the full content of critical documents like evaluation criteria and the draft contract are not summarized. This limits a comprehensive analytical assessment of these key components.

Full content of evaluation criteria and draft contract not summarized.
Fairness90/100

The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and the use of e-procurement. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company, and evaluation criteria are indicated as 'relative_weighting', suggesting transparency.

Practicality75/100

Electronic submission is supported, enhancing practicality. However, the contract start date is not specified, and while an estimated value is provided, a specific financing source is not detailed, which could be beneficial for bidders.

Contract start date not specified.
Specific financing source beyond estimated value not detailed.
Data Consistency70/100

A notable inconsistency exists where the tender explicitly states 'Value Classified: Yes' while simultaneously providing an 'Estimated Value: 25,000.00 EUR'. This contradiction can cause confusion.

Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and disclosed 'Estimated Value'.
Sustainability20/100

The tender completely lacks any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

No green procurement criteria.
No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear purpose and detailed technical requirements.
Good legal compliance and use of standard EU procurement documents (ESPD).
Transparent financial disclosure (estimated value).
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Reasonable submission deadline.

Concerns

Contradiction regarding 'Value Classified' status.
Lack of explicit sustainability (green, social, innovation) criteria.
Full content of critical documents (evaluation criteria, draft contract) not summarized for analysis.
Absence of a specific contract start date.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the 'Value Classified' status to avoid confusion for potential bidders.
2. Consider integrating sustainability criteria (environmental, social, innovation) into future tenders to align with modern procurement best practices.
3. Ensure all critical tender documents are fully accessible and their content clearly summarized for comprehensive bidder understanding.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline