Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login21 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
11 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the grounds for excluding subcontractors based on criminal offenses such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring bidders to provide answers regarding compliance with these conditions.
This document outlines bid submission requirements, including bidder representation rights, power of attorney for joint bidders, confirmation of bid conditions, and declaration of business secrets.
This document is a cost submission form for the tender for the demolition of vacant apartment buildings in Viivikonna, requiring bidders to specify prices for various works including site preparation, demolition, waste disposal, and landscaping.
This form is an application for participation where the bidder confirms reviewing the tender documents, accepting the conditions, and provides their details for submitting an offer.
This document specifies that tender evaluation will be based solely on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
This document is an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements that companies must submit electronically.
This document provides an overview of the general details for the Viivikonna emptying apartment buildings demolition works tender, including the contracting authority, funding source, and procurement procedure type.
This document is a draft procurement contract, outlining the terms and legal framework of the future agreement.
This document outlines the technical requirements and objectives for the demolition of 9 abandoned apartment buildings and associated landscaping works in Viivikonna village, Narva-Jõesuu.
This document is a power of attorney form, authorizing a representative to sign the bid and the procurement contract on behalf of the bidder.
This document is a power of attorney for submitting a joint bid, designating a lead bidder and confirming the joint and several liability of all joint bidders for the performance of the procurement contract.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender provides a clear project description and comprehensive documentation but suffers from critical internal inconsistencies regarding evaluation criteria and procedure type, severely impacting clarity, fairness, and data consistency. The lack of sustainability considerations is also a notable omission.
The tender generally adheres to legal frameworks with reasonable deadlines and proper CPV codes. However, the stated 'Procedure: A (Open Procedure)' combined with 'Negotiation Allowed' is a significant procedural ambiguity that could lead to legal challenges or misinterpretation of the procurement type.
While the general description and AI-extracted requirements are clear, there is a critical and direct contradiction regarding the evaluation criteria. The 'PROCUREMENT CHARACTERISTICS' states 'relative_weighting,' but Document 4 explicitly states evaluation will be 'based solely on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.' This fundamental inconsistency makes it unclear how bids will actually be evaluated.
All essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, deadlines, and location are provided. A comprehensive set of 12 documents is attached. However, the internal inconsistencies, particularly regarding evaluation criteria, detract from the overall completeness of coherent and unambiguous information.
The tender provides full document access, discloses the estimated value, and sets reasonable deadlines. E-procurement is enabled, and requirements do not appear tailored. However, the severe contradiction in the evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price) fundamentally undermines the objectivity and transparency of the evaluation process, making it impossible for bidders to prepare a fair and competitive offer.
Electronic submission is supported, a document URL is provided, and the contract start date is known. These elements contribute to practical execution. However, the significant clarity and fairness issues, especially concerning evaluation criteria, will likely create practical difficulties for bidders in preparing accurate and compliant submissions.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there are critical inconsistencies: the evaluation criteria are described contradictorily ('relative_weighting' vs. 'lowest price'), and the procedure type (Open) conflicts with the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic. These are fundamental data inconsistencies.
The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It appears to be a standard public works contract without specific sustainability considerations, which is a missed opportunity in modern procurement.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required