Lääne County, Lääne-Nigula Municipality, Vidruka village, OTSA:(Risti) F1 reconstruction (JTI148)
ClosedKey facts
- Buyer
- Elektrilevi OÜ
- Estimated value
- €59,518
- Deadline
- Expired
- CPV Code
- 45310000-3 — Electrical installation work
Original Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
13 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
8 documents available with AI summaries
This document details the tender submission conditions, including requirements for personnel qualifications (switchman, C-person), the cost table format, and representation rights.
No summary available for this document.
Bidders must submit a list of at least three similar electricity construction contracts successfully completed within the last 60 months, with one valued at €40,000 or more, and grant permission for their verification.
This document outlines the bid evaluation methodology, stating that the total cost of the bid without taxes is the sole criterion, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.
This document outlines mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds and technical and professional capability qualification conditions, requiring bidders to have completed similar electrical construction contracts previously.
This document outlines additional conditions for the OTSA:(Risti) F1 reconstruction, emphasizing the need to review tender documents and the site, notify the client of changes, take responsibility for damages, and adhere to Elektrilevi management system and P346/P399 standards.
No summary available for this document.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender for electrical installation work is generally well-structured for a small procurement, providing essential information and clear performance conditions. However, it suffers from critical inconsistencies regarding the evaluation criteria and a potentially restrictive experience requirement, which could impact fairness and competition.
Score Breakdown
Legal compliance is generally good, with reasonable deadlines and appropriate CPV codes. However, the significant contradiction regarding the evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price) poses a legal risk and needs immediate clarification.
The project description and performance conditions are clear. However, the fundamental contradiction in the stated evaluation criteria severely impacts the overall clarity of the tender, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged.
Most essential information, including basic details, deadlines, value, and location, is provided. However, the inability to analyze key documents (project details, base documents, cost table) due to unsupported file formats limits a full assessment of completeness. Financial requirements are not explicitly detailed in the summary.
While e-procurement is enabled and the value is disclosed, the high experience requirement (one previous contract of at least 40,000 EUR for a 59,518 EUR tender) could disproportionately limit competition. The contradictory evaluation criteria also undermine transparency and fairness.
The tender supports electronic submission, specifies a contract start date, and provides detailed financing conditions, indicating good practicality. The work completion deadline is also clearly stated.
There are significant data inconsistencies. The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the explicit disclosure of the estimated value. More critically, the 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' characteristic directly conflicts with Document 3 stating 'total cost... is the sole criterion'.
Despite being EU-funded, the tender explicitly lacks specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into the procurement process.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required