Tenders

Atlassian Products Consultancy and Development Service

Open
Deadline
17 days left
March 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
305775
Value
€350,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Price of 1 (one) service hour in euros, excluding VAT100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 20, 2026

Tender Opening

March 20, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 15, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€350,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
77
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€187,707
Avg. Bids
2.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
1,029 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority uses the functionality of JIRA Data Server, JIRA Service Management, and Confluence Data Server software for managing IT and content processes. The products are licensed under an Open Source Unlimited license. Procurement of Atlassian products consultancy and development service in accordance with the provisions of the public procurement documents.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer must not be subject to mandatory exclusion grounds as per the standard criteria of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305775_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 16.1 KB

This document outlines bidder requirements, including Atlassian product representation rights in Estonia, provision of product support in Estonian, registered Atlassian partnership, and the availability of a qualified team.

Raamlepingu täitmisele kaasatavate meeskonnaliikmete kinnituskiri.DOC
Vorm 2 Raamlepingu täitmisele kaasatavate mee... -- 16.3 KB

This document is a bidder's confirmation letter outlining and affirming the qualifications of team members involved in the framework agreement, including their proficiency in Atlassian products and the company's partner status, and requires team member signatures.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305775_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that bids for Atlassian product consultation and development services will be evaluated 100% based on the lowest price per service hour, excluding VAT.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305775_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.2 KB

This document is an explanatory guide for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, which bidders must complete electronically, not manually submit this PDF.

Lisa 2_Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 2_Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 114.2 KB

The contracting authority seeks to procure Atlassian product (Jira, Confluence, etc.) consultation and development services for both Data Center and Cloud versions under a framework agreement, with an estimated volume of 2500-3000 working hours and a maximum value of 350,000 euros over 24 months.

LisateavePDF
Lisateave (5).pdf -- 162.1 KB

This document provides general additional information about the public procurement for Atlassian product consultation and development services, detailing contracting authority data, framework agreement terms, funding, and grounds for invalidating the procurement procedure.

Raamlepingu projektPDF
Raamlepingu projekt (3).pdf -- 248.9 KB

This draft framework agreement outlines the terms, subject, general conditions, and execution procedures for the Atlassian product maintenance service contract to be concluded with the successful bidder.

Vorm 1 Uhispakkujate volikiriDOC
Vorm 1 Uhispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 14.0 KB

This power of attorney form allows one joint bidder to authorize another to submit a tender and perform procurement-related actions on their behalf.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

77
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Atlassian product consultation and development services is generally well-structured and transparent, with clear evaluation criteria and comprehensive documentation. However, the stringent qualification requirements for registered Atlassian partners significantly limit competition, raising fairness concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with the use of ESPD, e-procurement, and adherence to WTO/GPA. Deadlines are reasonable, and mandatory disclosure requirements are met. The generic procedure codes (Type: T, Procedure: A) could be more specific about the legal basis for negotiation, which slightly reduces the score.

Generic procedure codes (Type: T, Procedure: A) lack specific legal detail for the procurement procedure.
Clarity80/100

The description of services, technical specifications, and evaluation criteria (100% lowest price) are clear and unambiguous. The presence of a draft framework agreement further enhances clarity regarding performance conditions. While AI-extracted requirements are minimal, the document summaries indicate comprehensive and understandable requirements within the tender documents.

Completeness90/100

The tender is highly complete, providing all basic information, financial details, timelines, and classification codes. All necessary documents, including qualification requirements, technical specifications, and evaluation criteria, are listed and summarized, ensuring a comprehensive package for bidders.

Fairness55/100

While the tender offers full document access, discloses value, and uses objective evaluation criteria, the qualification requirements for 'Atlassian product representation rights in Estonia' and 'registered Atlassian partnership' are highly restrictive. This significantly limits the pool of potential bidders to a specific class of companies, raising substantial concerns about fair competition, despite the stated justification for specialized services.

Highly restrictive qualification requirements (Atlassian partnership, representation rights) limit competition.
Practicality75/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, which is practical for bidders. Key dates like contract start and duration are clearly specified. While financing information is mentioned in a document, its details are not summarized, and a direct, single URL for all documents is not explicitly provided, which are minor practical considerations.

Financing details are not fully summarized from the 'Lisateave' document.
A single, direct URL for all tender documents is not explicitly provided (though accessible via the e-procurement portal).
Data Consistency95/100

All key fields are populated, and the data is highly consistent. There are no detected issues, disputes, or suspensions, and all dates are logical and sequential, indicating robust data management.

Sustainability65/100

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Criteria,' which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks an explicit focus on innovation, which is a missed opportunity, especially for IT development services. The tender is not EU funded, which means it might not be subject to the higher sustainability standards often associated with EU projects.

No explicit innovation focus for the IT development services.

Strengths

Clear and objective 100% price-based evaluation criteria.
Comprehensive documentation including technical specifications and draft contract.
Full transparency on estimated value, duration, and key timelines.
Support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
Inclusion of Green Procurement and Social Criteria.

Concerns

Highly restrictive qualification requirements (Atlassian partnership, representation rights) limit competition.
Lack of explicit innovation focus, especially for IT development services.
The generic procedure codes (Type: T, Procedure: A) could be more specific about the legal basis.
AI-extracted requirements are minimal, suggesting potential for better structured data.

Recommendations

1. Review and potentially broaden qualification requirements to allow for equivalent experience or certifications, fostering greater competition.
2. Incorporate specific innovation-related criteria or objectives within the technical specifications.
3. Clearly state the specific legal procurement procedure (e.g., Open, Restricted, Competitive with Negotiation) for enhanced transparency.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline