Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

115-inch Screen for Ukuaru Music House

Closed

Updated October 16, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
305600
Value
€13,000
Location
Estonia
Published
January 29, 2026
Organization
Rakvere Kultuurikeskus
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 29, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 09, 2026

Tender Opening

February 09, 2026

Contract Start Date

February 23, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
View Original

Key facts

Buyer
Rakvere Kultuurikeskus
Estimated value
€13,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
32324000-0 — Televisions
Procedure
Simplified procedure
Source
Estonian Public Procurement Register
Budget
€13,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
81
Quality Score/100
Excellent
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€104,435
Avg. Bids
2.5
Competition
Low
SME Winners
94%
311 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Soovime soetada ühe 115 tollise ekraani, mis oleks reklaamide, videote ja otseülekannete näitamiseks. Juhitav peab olema läbi weebi. Täpsem detailne kirjeldus on tehnilises kirjelduses.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Similar open tenders

All open tenders in Estonia

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (5)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-02-09 10:00:00.
--Provide a detailed technical description of the proposed solution.
--Submit a detailed offer.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must meet the exclusion criteria set by the contracting authority, confirmed electronically via the ESPD.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must meet the qualification criteria set by the contracting authority, confirmed electronically via the ESPD.
--The bid must confirm compliance with all tender conditions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Supply and install new, environmentally friendly, and durable 115-inch screens.
--The offer must include all necessary accessories and installation services.
--Installation must take place at Rakvere, Vabaduse tn. 4.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid must include a detailed cost proposal.
--The cost of the offer will be a primary evaluation criterion (55% weight).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305600_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 5.2 KB

This document outlines the conditions for tender submission, cost, and equivalence, requiring confirmation of offer compliance and the submission of a technical description and a detailed offer.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305600_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.3 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria and their weightings (cost 55%, technical suitability 25%, delivery time 20%) along with the detailed assessment methodology for the procurement of a 115-inch screen for Ukuaru Music House.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305600_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 33.6 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the contracting authority's stipulated qualification and exclusion criteria that bidders must electronically confirm.

Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
LISA Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 92.5 KB

This document outlines Rakvere Kultuurikeskus's requirement to purchase and install new, environmentally friendly, and durable 115-inch screens with accessories at Rakvere, Vabaduse tn. 4 by February 26, 2026, ensuring the equipment's safety and compliance with Estonian/EU standards.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

81
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender is well-structured and clear, demonstrating good compliance with procurement principles, particularly in clarity and fairness, though minor improvements could be made in detailing contract duration and comprehensive sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance80/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, utilizing the ESPD and clearly defining the procedure type (LM) which is likely appropriate for the estimated value under national regulations. Deadlines are reasonable, and CPV codes are correctly assigned. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

•The specific national legal basis for the 'LM' procedure could be more explicitly referenced for absolute clarity, though for this value, it's generally understood as a simplified procedure.
Clarity90/100

The tender excels in clarity. The description is precise, requirements are well-documented and understandable, and evaluation criteria with their respective weightings (cost 55%, technical suitability 25%, delivery time 20%) are explicitly detailed in a dedicated document. Performance conditions, including installation location and deadline, are clearly stated.

Completeness85/100

The tender is largely complete, providing all essential basic information, financial details, and a clear timeline. Five relevant documents are attached, covering technical specifications, evaluation criteria, and tender conditions. Requirements and criteria are comprehensively defined across these documents.

•While 5 documents are attached, one XML ESPD document was not processed for AI analysis, which is a minor technical limitation rather than a tender completeness issue.
Fairness85/100

This tender demonstrates strong fairness. Full document access is provided, the estimated value is disclosed, and evaluation criteria are objective and transparent. Electronic submission is enabled, promoting equal access. The requirements for a 115-inch screen appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.

•A minor inconsistency exists where 'Value Classified: Yes' is indicated, despite the estimated value being explicitly disclosed. This is likely a system flag discrepancy rather than an actual classification issue.
Practicality70/100

The tender supports electronic submission and specifies a clear contract start date. However, detailed financing information beyond 'Not EU funded' is absent, and the overall contract duration is only specified in terms of delivery and installation deadline, lacking clarity on potential post-installation support or warranty periods.

•Lack of explicit overall contract duration beyond the delivery/installation deadline.
•No specific financing information beyond the estimated value.
Data Consistency85/100

Data consistency is high, with all key fields populated and logical, sequential dates. There are no reported suspensions or disputes.

•The only minor inconsistency is the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag appearing alongside the disclosed estimated value.
Sustainability60/100

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' and 'Innovation Focus' characteristics, with technical requirements for environmentally friendly and durable screens. However, it lacks specific social criteria, which is a common omission in sustainability considerations.

•Absence of explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear and detailed evaluation criteria with specified weightings.
Comprehensive technical specifications and tender conditions.
Support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
Explicit inclusion of Green Procurement and Innovation Focus.
Objective and non-tailored requirements.

Concerns

Minor inconsistency regarding 'Value Classified' flag despite value disclosure.
Lack of explicit overall contract duration beyond delivery/installation.
Absence of specific social criteria in sustainability aspects.
Limited detail on financing information.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the overall contract duration, including any warranty or support periods, beyond the initial delivery and installation.
2. Consider incorporating specific social criteria to enhance the tender's sustainability profile.
3. Ensure consistency in system flags, particularly regarding value classification, to avoid potential confusion.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

✨Want us to handle this tender?Let's Win This Tender