Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction of Soo road in Saku municipality

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
305474
Value
€1,600,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 27, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of construction of Soo Road in Saku Municipality100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Tender Opening

March 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,600,000
Duration
12 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of Soo road in Saku municipality in accordance with the tender documentation.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

22 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (13)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS13
--Submit bids for the construction of Soo tee in the form of a cost breakdown (Form 2), including costs for site preparation.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-03-30 12:00:00.
--The tender duration is 12 months.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm that their bid complies with all conditions set out in the tender documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm that their bid complies with all conditions set out in the tender documents.
--If applicable, submit a power of attorney for joint bidders.
--Indicate any business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The bidder must confirm that their bid complies with all conditions set out in the tender documents.
--The bidder must confirm that their bid complies with all conditions set out in the tender documents.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The estimated value of the tender is 1,600,000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305474_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 45.5 KB

The contracting authority will vet subcontractors for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305474_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.5 KB

Bidders must confirm that their bid meets all conditions set forth in the tender documents, including submitting a power of attorney for joint bidders if applicable and declaring any trade secrets.

Vorm 2 KululoendXLS
Vorm 2 Kululoend.xlsx -- 21.3 KB

The contracting authority seeks bids for the construction of Soo road, presenting a cost breakdown in Form 2, which includes costs for construction site preparation.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305474_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

In the tender for "Construction of Soo Road in Saku Municipality", bids are evaluated primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305474_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 85.9 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and the format of expected responses.

Juhised pakkujaleDOC
Juhised pakkujale.docx -- 127.7 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders participating in the public procurement procedure for the construction of Soo Road in Saku municipality.

Vorm 1 Ühise pakkumuse volikiriDOC
Vorm 1 Ühise pakkumuse volikiri.docx -- 14.8 KB

This document is a joint bid authorization letter, empowering one bidder to act on behalf of others in the Soo road construction tender.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road construction is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific sustainability considerations and some documentation formats are not directly analyzable.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and the financing condition is stated to be in the draft contract. No disputes are indicated. The 'or equivalent' clause for technical specifications enhances compliance.

Clarity80/100

The description of the work is clear, and the requirements are documented within the provided tender documents. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting', implying a structured approach. Conditions for compliance are generally clear, especially with the 'or equivalent' clarification.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the financing condition is only referenced as being in the draft contract, and some key documents (draft contract, technical specifications) are in ZIP format, limiting direct AI analysis and potentially requiring additional steps for bidders.

Key documents (draft contract, technical specifications) are in ZIP format, not directly analyzable.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable, and the evaluation criteria are stated to be based on relative weighting, with a clear indication that cost is the primary factor. The 'or equivalent' clause promotes fairness by not unduly restricting options. E-submission and e-procurement are mandated.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, but the duration is 12 months. Financing information is referenced in the draft contract. The availability of a cost breakdown form (Form 2) and a joint bid authorization form (Form 1) aids practicality.

Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no specific mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting the sustainability score.

No specific green procurement criteria.
No explicit social aspects or innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear description of work and requirements.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value.
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' clause for technical specifications.

Concerns

Key tender documents (draft contract, technical specifications) are in ZIP format.
Lack of specific sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Provide key tender documents in an easily accessible format (e.g., PDF) alongside ZIP files.
2. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria into the tender evaluation.
3. Clearly state the contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline