TigaSafe Fall Protection System Inspection

This tender for TigaSafe fall protection system inspection is generally well-structured and clear for a small procurement, with good transparency regarding evaluation criteria and estimated value. However, the unanalyzed contract form and lack of explicit sustainability criteria present minor limitations.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance for a small procurement. Deadlines are reasonable, CPV codes are appropriate, and there are no detected disputes. The procedure type 'VO' is clarified by an accompanying document, ensuring adherence to national regulations.

Clarity is a strong point, with a clear description of the service, well-documented and understandable requirements, and explicitly stated evaluation criteria (lowest price). AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and well-categorized.

The tender provides all essential basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification. Requirements and criteria are well-defined. However, the main contract document ('Töövõtulepingu vorm.zip') was not analyzed, which is a critical component for a full completeness assessment.

Fairness is well-addressed with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria based solely on price. E-procurement is enabled. The specific brand name 'TigaSafe' is likely justified for the inspection of an existing system.

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. The contract duration is clearly specified, and financing information is referenced to the contract form. The lack of AI analysis for the contract form, however, limits the ability to fully assess practical terms.

All key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent throughout the tender information, indicating high data integrity.

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This is common for technical service procurements of this nature and value, but it limits the score in this category.