Retour aux appels d'offres

TigaSafe Fall Protection System Inspection

Fermé

Date limite de soumission dépassée

La date limite de soumission de cet appel d'offres est dépassée et il n'accepte plus de candidatures. Les informations ci-dessous sont conservées à titre de référence.

Parcourir les appels d'offres actifs
Date limite
Expiré
Février 05, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Services
Référence
305377
Valeur
€9,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Janvier 27, 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Janvier 27, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Janvier 29, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Février 05, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Février 05, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€9,000
Durée
36 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€71,415
Offres moyennes
4.8
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
99%
2,006 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Hanke esemeks on hoone olemasoleva TigaSafe 456 jm horisontaalse kukkumiskaitsesüsteemi inspekteerimine hanke alusdokumentides toodud mahus ja tingimustel
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

16 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (8)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (1)
Technique (4)
Financier (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Submit the bid according to the general requirements for bid submission and formatting.
--For joint bids, submit a power of attorney.
--Confirm the bid's compliance with the conditions.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Confirm that there are no mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Be registered in the commercial register.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Have successfully completed at least one fall protection system inspection contract within the last 36 months.
--Perform annual inspection of the TigaSafe 456 linear horizontal fall protection system according to the technical task.
--Prepare inspection reports in accordance with standards EN 795:2012 and CEN/TS 16415:2013.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit the total bid price in euros without VAT.
--Provide prices for TigaSafe fall protection system inspection services for the years 2026-2028.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

8 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
305377_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.2 KB

This document outlines general tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint bid power of attorney, confirmation of bid compliance, cost presentation structure, and rules for marking business secrets.

Vorm 1. Pakkumuse maksumuse vormXLS
Vorm 1 Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm.xlsx -- 18.5 KB

Bidders must complete this form, providing prices for TigaSafe fall protection system inspection services for 2026-2028, stating the total cost in euros excluding VAT.

Vorm 2. Lepingute nimekiriDOC
Vorm 2 Lepingute nimekiri.docx -- 26.5 KB

Bidders must submit a list of at least one contract related to fall protection system inspection completed within the last 36 months, using Form 2.

Vorm 3. Vastutavate spetsialistide nimekiriDOC
Vorm 3 Vastutavate spetsialistide nimekiri.do... -- 27.6 KB

This form requires bidders to submit a list of responsible specialists who possess the required qualifications for working at heights and operating machinery in accordance with the Equipment Safety Act.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305377_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document specifies that the tender for TigaSafe fall protection system inspection will be evaluated solely based on the total offer cost (excluding VAT), with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
305377_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 9.2 KB

Bidders must confirm they have no exclusion grounds, are registered in a business register, and have completed at least one fall protection system inspection contract within the last 36 months.

Juhised pakkujatele_Väikehange RHR_14092022PDF
Juhised pakkujatele_Väikehange RHR_14092022.p... -- 458.7 KB

This tenderer instruction document outlines the general terms for conducting a small procurement, requirements for submitting and formatting bids, and the contracting authority's rights regarding negotiations and tender cancellation.

Tehniline ülesanneDOC
Tehniline ülesanne.docx -- 27.9 KB

This document outlines the technical task for the annual inspection of the TigaSafe 456 m horizontal fall protection system, including system description, scope of work, and reporting requirements in accordance with standards EN 795:2012 and CEN/TS 16415:2013.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

75
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for TigaSafe fall protection system inspection is generally well-structured and clear for a small procurement, with good transparency regarding evaluation criteria and estimated value. However, the unanalyzed contract form and lack of explicit sustainability criteria present minor limitations.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance for a small procurement. Deadlines are reasonable, CPV codes are appropriate, and there are no detected disputes. The procedure type 'VO' is clarified by an accompanying document, ensuring adherence to national regulations.

The procedure type 'VO' is not immediately self-explanatory in the basic information, requiring reference to other documents for full clarity.
Clarté80/100

Clarity is a strong point, with a clear description of the service, well-documented and understandable requirements, and explicitly stated evaluation criteria (lowest price). AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and well-categorized.

Exhaustivité70/100

The tender provides all essential basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification. Requirements and criteria are well-defined. However, the main contract document ('Töövõtulepingu vorm.zip') was not analyzed, which is a critical component for a full completeness assessment.

The main contract document ('Töövõtulepingu vorm.zip') was not analyzed, preventing a full assessment of its content and completeness.
Équité85/100

Fairness is well-addressed with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria based solely on price. E-procurement is enabled. The specific brand name 'TigaSafe' is likely justified for the inspection of an existing system.

Aspect pratique65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. The contract duration is clearly specified, and financing information is referenced to the contract form. The lack of AI analysis for the contract form, however, limits the ability to fully assess practical terms.

The inability to analyze the contract form ('Töövõtulepingu vorm.zip') limits the full assessment of practical terms, financing conditions, and detailed performance conditions.
Cohérence des données90/100

All key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent throughout the tender information, indicating high data integrity.

Durabilité50/100

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This is common for technical service procurements of this nature and value, but it limits the score in this category.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social aspects included.

Points forts

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Detailed technical task and qualification requirements.
Transparent estimated value and contract duration.
Good data consistency and logical timelines.

Préoccupations

The main contract document ('Töövõtulepingu vorm.zip') was not analyzed, limiting full assessment.
Procedure type 'VO' could be more explicitly defined in the basic information.
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Specific brand name 'TigaSafe' could potentially limit competition, though likely necessary for existing system inspection.

Recommandations

1. Ensure all critical tender documents, especially the contract form, are provided in an easily analyzable format (e.g., PDF, DOCX).
2. Explicitly define the procurement procedure type (e.g., 'Small Procurement' or 'Väikehange') in the basic information section for immediate clarity.
3. Consider incorporating relevant sustainability or social clauses where applicable, even for technical services, to align with modern procurement best practices.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline