Tenders

Reconstruction Works of Nõva Port - Phase III

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
305366
Value
€322,580
Location
Estonia
Published
February 04, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of Nõva harbor reconstruction works, III stage100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 02, 2026

Tender Opening

March 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€322,580
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
79
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

During the reconstruction works, a quay, slipway, and breakwater will be built, dredging works will be carried out, and the necessary technical systems for the operation of the port will be established, as well as the required design works.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

26 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (7)
Technical (6)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-02 12:00:00.
--Provide answers regarding the mandatory exclusion criteria for subcontractors (and the main bidder).
--Submit a European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Subcontractors (and likely the main bidder) must not have criminal convictions related to fraud, money laundering, human trafficking, etc.
--The bidder must provide answers regarding compliance with these criteria.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Submit a bid that complies with all tender conditions.
--If submitting a joint bid, provide a power of attorney for the joint bid.
--Declare any business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Perform Nõva harbor reconstruction works, III stage, including the construction of quay, slip, breakwater, dredging, and installation of technical systems.
--Adhere to the detailed technical requirements outlined in Annex 1 Technical Description.
--Follow all product instructions and installation norms.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit a cost proposal for the total cost of Nõva harbor reconstruction works, III stage.
--The bid will be evaluated solely based on the lowest total cost.
--Submit the cost proposal using the specified structure/form.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305366_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors during the contract execution phase, defining grounds for exclusion related to criminal convictions (e.g., fraud, money laundering, human trafficking) and requiring bidders to provide answers regarding compliance with these criteria.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305366_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

This document outlines the conditions for submitting a tender, including requirements for joint bid power of attorney, declaration of business secrets, exclusion of certain subcontractors, confirmation of bid compliance, and the structure for presenting the bid cost.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305366_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The sole criterion for evaluating bids is the total cost of the Nõva port reconstruction works Phase III, where the lowest-priced bid will receive the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305366_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.5 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) that details procurement and contracting authority information, outlining qualification requirements and expected response formats for bidders.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 244.4 KB

This document details the technical requirements for the Nõva harbor reconstruction works Stage III, including the construction of a pier, slipway, breakwater, dredging, installation of technical systems, and lists the foundational project documents.

Lisa 2 vorm 2 - Teise ettevõtja nõusolekDOC
Lisa 2 vorm 2 – Teise ettevõtja nõusolek.docx -- 18.8 KB

This document is a consent form from another entity, confirming their willingness to support the bidder in meeting qualification requirements and to participate in the execution of the procurement contract.

Lisa 2 vorm 3 - Ehitustööde projektijuhi CVDOC
Lisa 2 vorm 3 – Ehitustööde projektijuhi CV.d... -- 18.3 KB

This document is a form for submitting the construction project manager's CV, requiring their first name, surname, date of birth, and professional certificate number.

Lisa 3. Hankelepingu kavandPDF
Lisa 3 Hankelepingu kavand.pdf -- 267.8 KB

This document is a draft contract for the Nõva port reconstruction works, outlining the parties, object, and general terms of the future agreement.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.pdf -- 226.8 KB

Lääne-Nigula Rural Municipality Government invites bids for the Stage III reconstruction works of Nõva Port, including the construction of a quay, slipway, breakwater, dredging, and technical systems, with a submission deadline of March 2, 2026.

Regionaalministri määrus nr 45 (vastu võetud 19.07.2023)PDF
Regionaalministri määrus nr 45 (vastu võetud ... -- 90.1 KB

This regulation establishes the conditions and procedures for communicating about projects supported by the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF) and referencing the European Union's participation, including requirements for logo usage and public awareness activities.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

79
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Nõva harbor reconstruction works is generally well-structured and transparent, providing comprehensive documentation and clear requirements for bidders. While it benefits from EU funding and electronic submission, minor inconsistencies in data fields and a lack of explicit sustainability criteria slightly detract from an otherwise robust procurement process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, offering a reasonable submission deadline and an appropriate CPV code. However, there is a minor inconsistency regarding the stated evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. 'lowest total cost') which, while clarified in a specific document, presents a slight legal ambiguity in the overall tender notice.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (metadata vs. document content)
Clarity80/100

The description of works and requirements are clear and understandable. The evaluation criterion, 'lowest total cost', is explicitly defined in the relevant document, contributing to overall transparency. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and well-structured.

Completeness85/100

The tender is highly complete, providing all essential basic information, deadlines, estimated value, and duration. All critical documents, including technical specifications, a draft contract, and required forms, are attached and referenced, ensuring bidders have full information.

Fairness90/100

This tender demonstrates high fairness, offering full document access, a disclosed estimated value, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria. The justification for not dividing the tender is reasonable, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company, promoting equal access through e-procurement.

Practicality80/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing accessibility. Financing information (EU Funded, EMFAF) is available, and the tender validity duration is specified. While a specific project start date isn't in the basic info, it's typically detailed in the contract or technical documents.

Data Consistency70/100

There are notable inconsistencies in the data, specifically between the stated 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' and the 'lowest total cost' criterion detailed in a document. Additionally, the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the clearly disclosed estimated value, reducing overall data consistency.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description
Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and disclosed estimated value
Sustainability50/100

While the tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards, it explicitly lacks specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This omission prevents it from fully aligning with modern sustainability best practices in public procurement.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Comprehensive documentation including technical specifications and draft contract
Clear and objective evaluation criterion (lowest total cost)
Transparent justification for not dividing the tender into parts
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled for broad access
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' clause for standards, promoting fair competition

Concerns

Inconsistency between stated evaluation criteria and actual criterion
Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and disclosed estimated value
Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation procurement criteria
Some document formats (.xml, .asice, .rtf, .xls) were not analyzed by AI, potentially hiding details

Recommendations

1. Harmonize the stated evaluation criteria to consistently reflect 'lowest total cost' across all tender documents and metadata.
2. Clarify or correct the 'Value Classified' flag if the estimated value is indeed publicly disclosed.
3. Consider integrating specific green, social, or innovation criteria into future tenders, especially those with EU funding, to align with modern procurement best practices.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline