Retour aux appels d'offres

Travaux de reconstruction du port de Nõva – Phase III

Fermé
Date limite
0 jours restants
Mars 02, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
305366
Valeur
€322,580
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 04, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Total cost of Nõva harbor reconstruction works, III stage100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 04, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Février 23, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 02, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 02, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€322,580
Durée
Non spécifié
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Construction
79
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€524,963
Offres moyennes
4.7
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
94%
5,932 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Lors des travaux de reconstruction, une quai, une cale de mise à l'eau et une digue seront construites, des travaux de dragage seront effectués, et les systèmes techniques nécessaires au fonctionnement du port seront mis en place, ainsi que les travaux de conception requis.
Financement UESoumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

26 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (8)
Obligatoire (2)
Conformité (7)
Technique (6)
Financier (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-02 12:00:00.
--Provide answers regarding the mandatory exclusion criteria for subcontractors (and the main bidder).
--Submit a European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Subcontractors (and likely the main bidder) must not have criminal convictions related to fraud, money laundering, human trafficking, etc.
--The bidder must provide answers regarding compliance with these criteria.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Submit a bid that complies with all tender conditions.
--If submitting a joint bid, provide a power of attorney for the joint bid.
--Declare any business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Perform Nõva harbor reconstruction works, III stage, including the construction of quay, slip, breakwater, dredging, and installation of technical systems.
--Adhere to the detailed technical requirements outlined in Annex 1 Technical Description.
--Follow all product instructions and installation norms.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit a cost proposal for the total cost of Nõva harbor reconstruction works, III stage.
--The bid will be evaluated solely based on the lowest total cost.
--Submit the cost proposal using the specified structure/form.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

10 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305366_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors during the contract execution phase, defining grounds for exclusion related to criminal convictions (e.g., fraud, money laundering, human trafficking) and requiring bidders to provide answers regarding compliance with these criteria.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305366_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

This document outlines the conditions for submitting a tender, including requirements for joint bid power of attorney, declaration of business secrets, exclusion of certain subcontractors, confirmation of bid compliance, and the structure for presenting the bid cost.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305366_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The sole criterion for evaluating bids is the total cost of the Nõva port reconstruction works Phase III, where the lowest-priced bid will receive the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305366_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.5 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) that details procurement and contracting authority information, outlining qualification requirements and expected response formats for bidders.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 244.4 KB

This document details the technical requirements for the Nõva harbor reconstruction works Stage III, including the construction of a pier, slipway, breakwater, dredging, installation of technical systems, and lists the foundational project documents.

Lisa 2 vorm 2 - Teise ettevõtja nõusolekDOC
Lisa 2 vorm 2 – Teise ettevõtja nõusolek.docx -- 18.8 KB

This document is a consent form from another entity, confirming their willingness to support the bidder in meeting qualification requirements and to participate in the execution of the procurement contract.

Lisa 2 vorm 3 - Ehitustööde projektijuhi CVDOC
Lisa 2 vorm 3 – Ehitustööde projektijuhi CV.d... -- 18.3 KB

This document is a form for submitting the construction project manager's CV, requiring their first name, surname, date of birth, and professional certificate number.

Lisa 3. Hankelepingu kavandPDF
Lisa 3 Hankelepingu kavand.pdf -- 267.8 KB

This document is a draft contract for the Nõva port reconstruction works, outlining the parties, object, and general terms of the future agreement.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.pdf -- 226.8 KB

Lääne-Nigula Rural Municipality Government invites bids for the Stage III reconstruction works of Nõva Port, including the construction of a quay, slipway, breakwater, dredging, and technical systems, with a submission deadline of March 2, 2026.

Regionaalministri määrus nr 45 (vastu võetud 19.07.2023)PDF
Regionaalministri määrus nr 45 (vastu võetud ... -- 90.1 KB

This regulation establishes the conditions and procedures for communicating about projects supported by the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF) and referencing the European Union's participation, including requirements for logo usage and public awareness activities.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

79
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for Nõva harbor reconstruction works is generally well-structured and transparent, providing comprehensive documentation and clear requirements for bidders. While it benefits from EU funding and electronic submission, minor inconsistencies in data fields and a lack of explicit sustainability criteria slightly detract from an otherwise robust procurement process.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, offering a reasonable submission deadline and an appropriate CPV code. However, there is a minor inconsistency regarding the stated evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. 'lowest total cost') which, while clarified in a specific document, presents a slight legal ambiguity in the overall tender notice.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (metadata vs. document content)
Clarté80/100

The description of works and requirements are clear and understandable. The evaluation criterion, 'lowest total cost', is explicitly defined in the relevant document, contributing to overall transparency. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and well-structured.

Exhaustivité85/100

The tender is highly complete, providing all essential basic information, deadlines, estimated value, and duration. All critical documents, including technical specifications, a draft contract, and required forms, are attached and referenced, ensuring bidders have full information.

Équité90/100

This tender demonstrates high fairness, offering full document access, a disclosed estimated value, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria. The justification for not dividing the tender is reasonable, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company, promoting equal access through e-procurement.

Aspect pratique80/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing accessibility. Financing information (EU Funded, EMFAF) is available, and the tender validity duration is specified. While a specific project start date isn't in the basic info, it's typically detailed in the contract or technical documents.

Cohérence des données70/100

There are notable inconsistencies in the data, specifically between the stated 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' and the 'lowest total cost' criterion detailed in a document. Additionally, the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the clearly disclosed estimated value, reducing overall data consistency.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description
Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and disclosed estimated value
Durabilité50/100

While the tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards, it explicitly lacks specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This omission prevents it from fully aligning with modern sustainability best practices in public procurement.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Points forts

Comprehensive documentation including technical specifications and draft contract
Clear and objective evaluation criterion (lowest total cost)
Transparent justification for not dividing the tender into parts
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled for broad access
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' clause for standards, promoting fair competition

Préoccupations

Inconsistency between stated evaluation criteria and actual criterion
Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and disclosed estimated value
Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation procurement criteria
Some document formats (.xml, .asice, .rtf, .xls) were not analyzed by AI, potentially hiding details

Recommandations

1. Harmonize the stated evaluation criteria to consistently reflect 'lowest total cost' across all tender documents and metadata.
2. Clarify or correct the 'Value Classified' flag if the estimated value is indeed publicly disclosed.
3. Consider integrating specific green, social, or innovation criteria into future tenders, especially those with EU funding, to align with modern procurement best practices.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline