← Back to Tenders
Estonia0 days leftClosed

Technical implementation of the video exhibit 'Conductor's Stand' for the exhibition 'I Want to Play!'

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€22,000

DEADLINE

February 02, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Services

CPV CODE

51314000-6

REFERENCE

305268

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Hange hõlmab Teatri- ja Muusikamuuseumi ruumides (Müürivahe 12, Tallinn) avatava tegevusnäituse "Tahan mängida!" videoeksponaadi "Dirigendi pult" tehnilist teostust, mis sisaldab tehnilise lahendusega seotud ettevalmistustööd, seadmete tarnimist ja paigaldustööd.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Conditional bids are prohibited.
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must comply with all conditions set out in the procurement documents.
  • The bidder must agree to the terms of the draft contract, including work deadlines and warranty maintenance.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must comply with the technical implementation and specifications of the "Conductor's Desk" video exhibit for the "I Want to Play!" exhibition.
  • The solution must meet the detailed technical specifications and include recommended equipment models for the "Conductor's Desk" video exhibit.
  • The solution must include active speakers, projectors, a touchscreen, and a computer, along with their functionality and installation works.
  • The solution must implement the technical solution and functionality of the "Conductor's Desk" digital exhibit, allowing a player to control the orchestra video's tempo and dynamics with movements.
  • The bid must specify the delivery time, warranty, and response time, as these are quality evaluation criteria.
  • The work must be completed within 2 months from the contract signing.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid's cost must be submitted using the provided "Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm" (Bid Cost Form).
  • The cost form must detail the necessary equipment and services for the technical implementation of the video exhibit.
  • The bid's cost will be evaluated as 40% of the total score.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must be submitted electronically.
  • The bid must include a confirmation that it complies with all conditions set out in the procurement documents.
  • The bid's cost must be submitted using the provided "Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm".
  • The submission deadline is 2026-02-02 at 12:00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Vastavustingimused
Vastavusdeklaratsioon305268_vastavustingimused.pdf2.7 KB
Summary:
This document requires bidders to confirm that their tender complies with all conditions set out in the procurement documents, prohibiting conditional bids.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid305268_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf4.6 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the evaluation criteria and methodology for proposals, dividing the assessment into 40% for cost and 60% for quality, which includes compliance with the task, delivery time, warranty, and response time.
PDF
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305268_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitusteg...37.0 KB
Summary:
This ESPD is an explanatory document detailing the contracting authority's conditions and expected responses for the "Dirigendi pult" video exhibit technical implementation tender, which bidders must complete electronically.
DOC
Lepinguprojekt
Lepingu Mall305268_Tahan mängida_Videoeksponaadi teh...46.4 KB
Summary:
This draft contract outlines the terms for the technical implementation of the "Conductor's Desk" video exhibit for the "I Want to Play!" exhibition, including the work deadline and warranty maintenance.
XLS
Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm
Esitamise Vormid305268_Tahan mängida_Videoeksponaadi teh...19.1 KB
Summary:
This form is intended for submitting the tender's cost, detailing the required equipment and services for the technical implementation of the "Conductor's Stand" video exhibit.
DOC
Tehniline kirjeldus / lähteülesanne
Tehnilised Spetsifikatsioonid305268_Tahan mängida_Videoeksponaadi teh...53.9 KB
Summary:
This document details the technical specifications and execution requirements for the 'Conductor's stand' video exhibit for the 'I want to play!' exhibition at the Estonian History Museum.
XLS
TK lisa 2 digieksponaadi kirjeldus
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidTahan mängida_digieksponaadi kirjeldus.x...73.9 KB
Summary:
This document describes the technical solution and functionality of the "Conductor's Stand" digital exhibit for the "I Want to Play!" exhibition, where a player can control the tempo and dynamics of an orchestra video with their movements.
XLS
TK lisa 1 Seadmete spetsifikatsioon
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidTahan mängida_Videoeksponaadi tehniline ...19.5 KB
Summary:
This document details the technical specifications and recommended equipment models for the "Conductor's Desk" video exhibit, including active speakers, projectors, a touch screen, and a computer, along with their functionalities and installation works.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a museum exhibit's technical implementation is generally well-structured and clear, providing comprehensive technical and evaluation details, though it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has minor data inconsistencies.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears compliant with national regulations, utilizing a simplified procedure appropriate for its value and including ESPD documents. The CPV code is relevant, and deadlines are reasonable.

•The procedure type is given as a code (LM) without explicit naming in English, which is a minor point for international clarity.
Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear description, detailed technical specifications across multiple documents, and explicit evaluation criteria with relative weightings. Performance conditions are clearly referenced in the draft contract.

•The 'Location Info: Täpne piirkond määratlemata' in the structured data contradicts the specific address provided in the description, creating a minor ambiguity.
Completeness70/100

All essential basic, financial, and timeline information is present. Requirements and evaluation criteria are thoroughly defined across several documents, including a draft contract.

•Two listed documents (ESPD XML, room plan ZIP) were not summarized by AI, meaning their content could not be fully verified in this assessment.
•The structured 'Location Info' field is vague despite a specific address in the description.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, electronic submission, and transparent, objective evaluation criteria (cost and quality factors). Document access appears full.

•The detailed technical specifications include 'recommended equipment models,' which, if overly restrictive or proprietary, could potentially limit competition, though this cannot be confirmed without further detail.
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and key dates (contract start, duration) and financing are clearly specified, enhancing practicality for bidders.

•The provided tender information does not include a direct URL for accessing documents, which might require bidders to navigate a portal, adding a minor practical step.
•The 'Täpne piirkond määratlemata' also adds a slight practical ambiguity.
Data Consistency90/100

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no detected disputes or suspensions. Key information is generally consistent across fields.

•The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag appears alongside a clearly stated estimated value, which is a metadata inconsistency.
•The 'Location Info' field is inconsistent with the detailed description.
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, nor is it indicated as EU-funded.

•Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Comprehensive technical specifications and detailed requirements.
Clear and transparent evaluation criteria with relative weightings.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
All key financial and timeline information is disclosed.
Draft contract provided for review.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Minor inconsistencies between structured data fields (e.g., location, value classified) and detailed descriptions.
'Recommended equipment models' in technical specs could potentially limit competition if overly specific.
Two documents were not summarized by AI, limiting full content verification.

Recommendations

1. Explicitly address sustainability, social, or innovation aspects where applicable, even for technical projects (e.g., energy efficiency of equipment).
2. Ensure full consistency between structured data fields and descriptive text, especially for location and value classification.
3. Clarify if 'recommended equipment models' are indicative or mandatory, and ensure they allow for equivalent alternatives to promote broader competition.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
75/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes