Reconstruction of Tori wastewater pumping stations RVP-1, RVP-2 and RVP-3
ClosedKey facts
- Estimated value
- €142,500
- Deadline
- Expired
- CPV Code
- 45232423-3 — Sewage pumping stations construction work
- Procedure
- Simplified procedure
Original Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
17 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
9 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the tender submission conditions, covering the declaration of business secrets, submission of offer costs, general bid compliance confirmation, provision of technical data for compact pumps, and requirements for joint bidder authorization.
Bidders (and each joint bidder) must submit a confirmation stating that there are no grounds for exclusion that would prevent their participation in the tender.
This document requires the tenderer to submit a list of similar construction works performed within the last 60 months to demonstrate qualification for the reconstruction of Tori wastewater pumping stations.
This document is the tender notice for the reconstruction of Tori wastewater pumping stations RVP-1, RVP-2, and RVP-3, outlining the general terms and conditions for submitting bids.
This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the reconstruction tender of Tori wastewater pumping stations RVP-1, RVP-2, and RVP-3, where the total bid cost (excluding VAT) is the sole criterion with a 100% weighting, and the lowest bid receives the maximum score.
This document outlines the grounds for exclusion and qualification conditions for bidders, covering criminal offenses, tax debt, and breaches of previous contracts, for which bidders are required to provide confirmations.
This document is a draft construction contract outlining the roles, contact details, and general terms and conditions for the reconstruction of Tori wastewater pumping stations for the Client and Contractor.
No summary available for this document.
This document is a power of attorney for joint tenderers, authorizing one partner to represent the others in the submission of the tender.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender for the reconstruction of wastewater pumping stations is generally well-structured and transparent, particularly regarding its clear evaluation criteria and e-procurement features. However, it exhibits some minor data inconsistencies and lacks explicit details on project duration and sustainability aspects.
Score Breakdown
The tender clearly defines the procedure type, assigns appropriate CPV codes, and references national procurement regulations (RHS). Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no detected disputes or suspensions. A minor metadata inconsistency exists with 'Value Classified: Yes' despite the estimated value being disclosed.
The description of works is clear and unambiguous. Requirements are well-documented and understandable, supported by AI-extracted details and specific tender documents. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 100% cost-based, ensuring transparency.
All basic information, financial details, and deadlines are provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are comprehensively defined. However, the actual duration of the reconstruction works is not explicitly stated, and the technical description is provided as a .zip file, which is not summarized.
The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed estimated value, reasonable preparation deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria (100% cost). Electronic submission ensures equal access, and requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company.
Electronic submission is fully supported, enhancing practicality. However, the contract start date is not specified, and the actual project duration is missing. Financing information is limited to payment conditions within the contract, without details on funding source or specific budget allocation beyond the estimated value.
Key fields are generally populated, and dates are logical. The primary inconsistency is the contradiction between the disclosed 'Estimated Value' and the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag. A minor point is the 'relative_weighting' characteristic when the evaluation is 100% cost.
The tender does not include any explicit green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required