Preparation of energy audits

This tender for energy audits is well-structured with clear requirements and transparent evaluation criteria, though it lacks explicit contract duration and sustainability considerations. The e-procurement features enhance accessibility and fairness.

Deadlines are reasonable, the procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined and appropriate. No disputes or suspensions are reported, and the use of ESPD indicates compliance with EU/national regulations. Mandatory disclosure requirements for basic information and value are met, and evaluation criteria are explicitly stated in Document 1.

The tender description is clear and unambiguous. Requirements, including mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical capability, financial, and submission, are well-documented and understandable, supported by detailed service descriptions for each location. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as lowest cost, and performance conditions are outlined in the draft contract and service descriptions.

All basic information, deadlines, and estimated value are present. All 9 tender documents are attached and summarized, providing comprehensive details. Requirements and evaluation criteria are well-defined, and location information is clearly provided. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated in the basic information or AI summary, which is a notable omission.

Full document access is provided, and the estimated value is disclosed. The 10-day submission deadline is reasonable for preparation. Evaluation criteria (lowest cost) are objective and transparent. E-procurement and electronic submission are enabled, ensuring equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. Financing information (estimated value) is available. However, the contract start date is not explicitly known from the provided data, and the duration is not clearly specified, which can hinder bidders' planning and resource allocation.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Minor inconsistencies include 'Value Classified: Yes' despite the estimated value being disclosed, and the NUTS code is missing. The automated check's flags regarding missing evaluation criteria and location info contradict the actual document content, but the tender's internal data is largely consistent.

The tender lacks any explicit mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.