Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Otepää Town Landscaping 2026

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
305185
Value
€33,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 25, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Lowest price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 09, 2026

Tender Opening

March 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€33,000
Duration
9 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€43,718
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
562 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to conclude a works contract for the planting of summer flowers in the town of Otepää, as well as renovation and maintenance works of hanging baskets, flower boxes, and summer and perennial flower beds throughout the 2026 growing season.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on a straightforward landscaping project with a clear technical scope. Success hinges on meticulous adherence to the technical specifications, competitive pricing within the specified structure, and demonstrating reliability. While social and innovative aspects are absent, a strong emphasis on quality execution and efficient resource management will be key differentiators.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and High-Quality Landscaping Execution for Otepää Town

Cost-Effective and Efficient Plant Sourcing and Maintenance

Commitment to Meeting Otepää Vallavalitsus's Specific Horticultural Vision

Key Opportunities
Competitive pricing through efficient operational planning and plant sourcing.
Demonstrating a deep understanding of the specified plant species and color combinations to meet the 'technical description' requirements.
Leveraging existing local supplier relationships for cost-effective and timely plant procurement.
Key Challenges
Potential for intense price competition due to the absence of specified evaluation criteria beyond price.

Focus on optimizing operational efficiency and plant sourcing to offer the most competitive price without compromising quality. Clearly articulate cost-saving measures in the bid where appropriate.

Strict adherence to the technical specifications for plant species, volumes, and color combinations.

Thoroughly review and cross-reference 'lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus' with the volume table. Ensure procurement plans align precisely with these requirements. Consider a pre-bid site visit if possible to gain a better understanding of the planting locations.

The tender is not divided into lots, requiring a comprehensive bid for all aspects of the landscaping project.

Ensure the bid team has expertise across all required areas (plant sourcing, planting, maintenance). Develop a detailed project plan that clearly outlines how each component will be managed and executed efficiently.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized landscaping company with proven experience in municipal planting and maintenance, possessing a strong local presence or understanding of Otepää's specific horticultural needs. They should have efficient operational processes for plant sourcing and installation, and a robust quality control system.
Key Requirements
Adherence to specified plant species, volumes, and color combinations in the technical description.
Accurate completion of the provided volume table with plant quantities, prices, and additional information.
Submission of costs in the required structure, with the bid price being the total sum from the volume table (excluding VAT).
Compliance with all conditions, procedures, and requirements outlined in the main tender document and contract project.
Proof of eligibility and confirmation of bid submission.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience in municipal landscaping projects of similar scale and complexity.
A clear and efficient operational plan for plant sourcing, installation, and maintenance, highlighting cost-effectiveness.
A strong understanding of local climate and soil conditions relevant to Otepää, ensuring plant longevity and aesthetic appeal.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly requested, consider a brief mention of employing local labor for planting and maintenance where feasible, demonstrating a commitment to the Otepää community.
Bid Focus Areas
PriceN/A (assumed primary driver)

Meticulously populate the volume table with accurate quantities and competitive unit prices. Ensure the total sum (excluding VAT) is highly competitive. Explore cost-saving opportunities in plant sourcing and logistics.

Technical ComplianceN/A (assumed critical)

Ensure absolute alignment with 'lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus' regarding plant species, volumes, and color schemes. Clearly demonstrate the capability to deliver precisely what is specified.

Recommendations6
Meticulous Technical Specification Adherence
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct a thorough review of 'lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus' to ensure every plant species, volume, and color combination is precisely matched in the bid. Any deviation will likely lead to disqualification or significant scoring reduction.

Ensures bid compliance and avoids disqualification.
Competitive Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Focus on optimizing operational costs and plant procurement to offer the most competitive price within the specified volume table structure. Benchmark against similar projects if possible.

Maximizes chances of winning if price is the primary evaluation factor.
Demonstrate Operational Efficiency
HighMed effort

Outline a clear and efficient plan for plant sourcing, delivery, planting, and ongoing maintenance. Highlight any processes that ensure timely execution and cost-effectiveness.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver reliably and within budget.
Accurate Volume Table Population
HighHigh effort

Ensure all light blue cells in the provided table are filled accurately with plant quantities, unit prices, and any relevant additional information. Double-check calculations for the total bid price.

Directly impacts the bid price and demonstrates attention to detail.
Clarify Ambiguities
MediumLow effort

If any aspect of the technical description or volume table is unclear, proactively seek clarification from Otepää Vallavalitsus before the submission deadline. Document all communications.

Prevents errors and potential disputes later in the process.
Local Employment Mention
LowLow effort

Include a brief statement about the intention to utilize local labor for planting and maintenance, if feasible, to demonstrate community engagement.

Adds a positive, albeit minor, element to the bid.
Competitive Positioning
Position as a reliable, experienced, and cost-effective landscaping provider with a proven track record in municipal projects. Emphasize efficiency and adherence to specifications as key strengths.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--The tender is for Otepää linna haljastus 2026.
--The contracting authority is Otepää Vallavalitsus.
--The CPV code is Haljasalade istutus- ja hooldusteenused.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority has not divided the procurement into lots, as it is not economically or technically expedient.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The contracting authority requires a power of attorney for joint bidders.
--Confirmation of bid submission.
--Submission of costs in the required structure.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit a bid for the design, installation, and maintenance of Otepää town landscaping, adhering to the volumes, plant species, and color combinations specified in the technical description.
--Bidders must fill in the light blue cells of the provided table, entering data on plant quantities, prices, and additional information for carrying out landscaping work.
--The service to be procured includes the procurement of plants, planting work, and maintenance work throughout the entire growing season.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid price will be determined by the total sum from the volume table, excluding VAT.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305185_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 5.9 KB

The contracting authority requires a power of attorney for joint bidders, confirmation of bid submission, cost presentation in the specified structure, and proof of equivalence to ensure compliance with requirements.

lisa 2 - MahutabelXLS
Lisa 2 - Mahutabel 2026_ 305185.xlsx -- 23.5 KB

The bidder must fill in the light blue cells of the provided table, entering data on plant quantities, prices, and additional information for landscaping work.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305185_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluation criteria focus on the lowest price, where the bid cost is determined by the total sum from the bill of quantities excluding VAT.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305185_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 37.0 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion itself.

lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus 2026.pdf -- 574.1 KB

Bidders must submit a proposal for the design, installation, and maintenance of Otepää town's landscaping, adhering to the volumes, plant species, and color combinations specified in the technical description.

lisa 3 - Töövõtulepingu projektPDF
lisa 3 - Töövõtulepingu projekt.pdf -- 287.4 KB

This is the draft works contract for the Otepää town landscaping 2026 tender, outlining the contract object, deadline, and the rights and obligations of the parties.

Riigihanke alusdokumentPDF
Riigihanke alusdokument.pdf -- 629.0 KB

This foundational tender document outlines the terms, procedures, and requirements for the Otepää town landscaping 2026 tender, which bidders must adhere to.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Otepää town landscaping in 2026 is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation based on the lowest price. However, it lacks explicit details on social and innovative aspects, and the financing condition is vague.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure is identified as 'LM' (likely a local procurement type). No disputes are reported. The financing condition is referenced to the contract project, which is acceptable but could be more explicit.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service (summer flower planting and maintenance) is clear. Technical specifications are detailed in 'lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus' and the submission format is specified in 'lisa 2 - Mahutabel'. The evaluation criteria are stated as 'relative_weighting' but the description clarifies it's based on the lowest price.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration. However, the financing condition is only referenced to the contract project, and while the contract project is attached, more direct information on financing would improve completeness.

Fairness85/100

The tender is open to e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation is based on the lowest price, which is an objective criterion. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The decision not to divide the tender into lots is justified by economic and technical reasons.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are specified. The contract duration is clear. However, the financing condition is vague, only referring to the contract project, which might require bidders to infer details. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, though implied by the growing season.

•Financing condition is vague, requiring reference to contract project.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration are populated. Dates are logical, with a reasonable submission deadline relative to the reveal date. No suspension or disputes are indicated.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, there are no specific details or requirements related to social aspects or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

•Lack of specific details on social aspects and innovation.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and submission format.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Use of e-procurement and e-submission.
Justification for not dividing the tender into lots.

Concerns

Vague financing condition.
Lack of explicit details on social and innovative aspects.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Provide more explicit details on financing conditions.
2. Elaborate on specific sustainability goals beyond 'Green Procurement', including social and innovation aspects.
3. Clearly state the intended contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes