Design of district heating pipelines at Aia St 64, Aia St 66a, Körberi St 12 and Pikk St 56, and construction of district heating pipelines at Körberi St 12 and Pikk St 56 in Kuressaare
ClosedKey facts
- Estimated value
- €65,000
- Deadline
- Expired
- CPV Code
- 45231113-0 — Pipeline relaying works
- Procedure
- Simplified procedure
Original Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
15 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
9 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines tender submission conditions, including requirements for submitting a joint tender power of attorney, site visit protocol, price list, MTR registration, and welder certification for the district heating pipeline design and construction tender.
This document specifies that the sole evaluation criterion for bids is the total offer cost without VAT, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.
This document is an explanatory procurement pass (ESPD) detailing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the expected format for the economic operator's responses regarding qualification requirements and exclusion grounds, intended for review, not for submission.
This document is a draft construction contract for the Kuressaare district heating pipeline design and construction project, outlining the general terms and contracting parties.
This document details the technical conditions for the installation of a heat substation and the construction of a heating system for an apartment building at Pikk 56, Kuressaare, including heat load, system parameters, and equipment requirements.
This document illustrates the planned district heating pipeline layout, including shut-off devices and insulated piping specifications for sections on Aia, Körberi, and Pikk streets.
The document details the existing and first-phase planned heating pipeline infrastructure, including pipe dimensions and locations, for the Kuressaare project.
This technical description details the scope of work for designing and constructing/reconstructing district heating pipelines for residential buildings at Aia tn 64, Aia tn 66 a, Körberi tn 12, and Pikk tn 56 in Kuressaare, encompassing all necessary tasks from design to site restoration.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender for district heating pipeline design and construction in Kuressaare is generally well-structured and clear, providing comprehensive documentation and transparent evaluation criteria. While strong in completeness and data consistency, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on making contract duration immediately visible.
Score Breakdown
The tender appears compliant with national regulations, featuring a reasonable submission period, clearly defined procedure, and appropriate CPV codes. The disclosure of an estimated value, despite being marked as 'classified', maintains transparency.
The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-documented across various categories. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined as the total offer cost without VAT, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points, ensuring transparency for bidders.
The tender provides a comprehensive set of information, including all basic details, financial figures, timeline, and a substantial collection of supporting documents, ensuring bidders have access to necessary information.
The tender promotes fairness through electronic submission, transparent evaluation criteria, and reasonable deadlines. The decision not to divide the tender into parts is justified by the contracting authority as economically unviable for a small-scale project, which is a common approach for integrated works.
Electronic submission is supported, and payment terms are clear. However, the contract's overall duration is not explicitly stated in the basic information, which could require deeper document review.
Key fields are consistently populated, and there are no detected issues, disputes, or logical inconsistencies in the provided data, indicating a well-maintained record.
The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria, representing a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into the project.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required