Procurement of consulting services from active appraisers for conducting regular land valuation (Land and Spatial Agency)

This tender requires specialized consultancy services for testing and conducting regular land valuations. A winning bid will focus on demonstrating deep expertise in real estate appraisal methodology, providing highly qualified appraisers, and offering a cost-effective solution within the specified budget. Emphasis on the quality and experience of the appraisers will be paramount.

Unrivaled Expertise in Land Valuation Methodology and Practice

Highly Qualified and Certified Appraisal Team for Accurate and Reliable Results

Cost-Effective and Compliant Solution for Regular Land Valuation

Provide detailed CVs for all proposed appraisers, highlighting their certifications, extensive work experience in land valuation, specific transaction analysis skills, and any relevant additional qualifications. Clearly map their experience to the requirements of testing and conducting regular land valuations. Emphasize the collective expertise of the team.

In the technical proposal, clearly outline the bidder's approach to testing and evaluating the proposed land valuation methodology. Demonstrate a deep understanding of valuation principles and potential challenges. Propose a structured and rigorous testing process.

Develop a detailed cost breakdown that is competitive within the 36,000 EUR budget. Ensure all costs are clearly defined and justified. Explicitly confirm compliance with all tender conditions and the draft contract.

Ensure every CV submitted for appraisers clearly and comprehensively details their professional certification (e.g., 'certified real estate appraiser'), years of relevant work experience, specific roles in land valuation and transaction analysis, and any additional qualifications that enhance their competence for this specific tender. Use the provided CV form precisely.

Develop a detailed section in the technical proposal that outlines the bidder's specific approach to testing and evaluating the land valuation methodology. This should include proposed steps, analytical frameworks, and how potential issues or limitations will be identified and assessed.

Beyond individual CVs, present the team of up to six appraisers as a cohesive unit with complementary skills. Emphasize the breadth and depth of their combined experience in land valuation and methodology assessment.

Thoroughly review all tender documents, including the 'Lihthankemenetluse kord' and the draft contract. Ensure the offer explicitly confirms acceptance of all conditions and that the bid is fully compliant. Pay close attention to submission requirements and deadlines.

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume that technical competence and appraiser qualifications will be heavily weighted, as suggested by the 'Hindamismetoodika' document. Structure the bid to maximize perceived value in these areas, providing more detail and evidence than might be strictly necessary.

Carefully calculate the fixed costs per part, ensuring they are competitive within the overall tender value of 36,000 EUR. Provide a clear justification for the proposed costs, linking them to the quality and expertise of the appraisal team.

If feasible and aligned with the bidder's values, consider a brief statement about contributing to the professional development of appraisers through sharing insights gained from this project, framed as a value-add beyond the core service.

This tender for consultancy services related to land valuation is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and clarity.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are indicated. The procedure is identified as 'LM' (likely a national procedure type).

The description of the service is clear, and technical requirements for appraisers are well-documented. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and contract duration reduces overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value and deadlines. However, the lack of specified contract duration and explicit evaluation criteria means some key details are missing from the provided summary.

The tender promotes fairness through electronic submission and e-procurement. Objective criteria for technical capability are outlined, and the value is disclosed. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

The tender supports e-submission and e-procurement. A draft contract is provided, and financing information is implicitly linked to the estimated value. However, the contract start date is not specified, and the duration is missing.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes, and the dates provided are logical.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender does not indicate if it is EU-funded.