Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Combi Sheet Metal Punching and Laser Cutting Machine

Closed

Updated October 08, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 11, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
305040
Value
€1,027,000
Location
Estonia
Published
January 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 04, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 11, 2026

Tender Opening

February 11, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€1,027,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
42610000-5 — Machine tools operated by laser and machining centres
Budget
€1,027,000
Duration
18 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
73
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€91,816
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
473 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

INOX BALTIC OÜ is procuring a Combi Sheet Metal Punching and Laser Cutting Machine.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (1)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--The bid must conform to the basic procurement documents.
--Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney, using Form 1 (Form 1 Joint tender.docx).
--Principles of equivalence must be followed when preparing and submitting the bid.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The tenderer must not have tax debts.
--The tenderer must not be subject to origin restrictions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tenderer must have experience in supplying at least one combined sheet metal punching and laser cutting machine within the last 60 months.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bid must comply with the mandatory technical requirements for the combined sheet metal punching and laser cutting machine as specified in Annex 1.
--Bidders must confirm compliance with technical requirements and provide references to their technical documentation.
--The offered machine's laser cutting power should be over 3 kW (evaluation criterion).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid cost must be submitted in the prescribed structure.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305040_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.9 KB

This document specifies bid submission conditions, requiring a power of attorney for joint bidders, compliance with tender documents, structured cost presentation, and adherence to equivalence and business secret principles.

Annex 1. Technical RequirementsDOC
Annex 1 Technical Requirements.docx -- 62.4 KB

This document details the mandatory technical specifications for the Combi Sheet Metal Punching and Laser Cutting Machine, requiring bidders to confirm compliance and provide references to their technical documentation.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305040_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.3 KB

This document details the evaluation criteria for the Combi Sheet Metal Punching and Laser Cutting Machine tender, allocating 70% to price and 10% each to laser cutting power (above 3 kW), punching force (above 20 kN), and the number of autoindex stations (above 4).

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
305040_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 7.4 KB

This document outlines tenderer exclusion grounds, such as tax arrears and origin restrictions, and qualification conditions requiring experience with at least one Combi Sheet Metal Punching and Laser Cutting Machine delivery within the last 60 months.

Form 1. Joint TenderDOC
Form 1 Joint tender.docx -- 63.4 KB

This document is a power of attorney for joint tenderers, confirming the appointment of an authorized representative and the joint and several liability of the joint bidders for the performance of the procurement contract.

Procurement DocumentDOC
Procurement Document.docx -- 1.1 MB

This document outlines the general procurement procedure for INOX BALTIC OÜ's acquisition of a Combi Sheet Metal Punching and Laser Cutting Machine, including rules on confidentiality and trade secrets.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

73
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a Combi Sheet Metal Punching and Laser Cutting Machine is generally well-structured with clear technical and evaluation criteria. However, it presents ambiguities regarding the 'Required: No' status of essential tender documents and a data inconsistency concerning the 'Value Classified' field.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, offering a reasonable submission deadline and appropriate CPV codes. No disputes are detected. Minor concerns include the lack of explicit definitions for procedure type codes (A, MS) and a slight inconsistency with 'Value Classified: Yes' despite the value being disclosed.

•Lack of explicit definition for procedure type codes (A, MS)
•Minor inconsistency with 'Value Classified: Yes' when value is disclosed
Clarity80/100

The description, requirements, and evaluation criteria are generally clear and understandable, with detailed and objective technical specifications. A significant concern is the 'Required: No' status for crucial tender documents like 'Vastavustingimused' (Tender Conditions) and 'Hindamiskriteeriumid' (Evaluation Criteria), which creates confusion about their mandatory nature for bidders.

•'Required: No' status for essential tender documents (e.g., Tender Conditions, Evaluation Criteria)
Completeness70/100

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided, and requirements and criteria are well-defined. All documents are listed. The primary drawback is the 'Required: No' designation for critical documents, which raises questions about their full mandatory adherence for bidders.

•'Required: No' designation for critical documents (e.g., Tender Conditions, Evaluation Criteria)
Fairness85/100

The tender ensures electronic access and submission, with objective and transparent evaluation criteria. The estimated value is disclosed. The experience requirement (one machine within 60 months) is specific but likely justifiable for a complex machine and does not appear tailored to a specific company.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. EU funding information is available. However, a direct document URL is not explicitly provided, and the contract start date is missing.

•No explicit document URL provided
•Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency70/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. The main inconsistency lies between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the explicitly disclosed estimated value. Additionally, the 'Required: No' status for essential documents creates an inconsistency regarding their importance.

•Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and disclosed estimated value
•'Required: No' status for essential documents creating inconsistency
Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards, but it lacks explicit green, social, or innovation criteria. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability aspects into the procurement process.

•Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation criteria

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and objective evaluation criteria with relative weighting.
Estimated value is disclosed, enhancing transparency.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are enabled.
EU funding suggests adherence to broader EU procurement principles.
Reasonable submission deadline.

Concerns

'Required: No' status for critical tender documents (e.g., Tender Conditions, Evaluation Criteria) is confusing.
Inconsistency between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the explicit disclosure of the estimated value.
Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation procurement criteria.
Procedure type codes (A, MS) are not clearly defined within the provided context.
Experience requirement, while potentially justified, is specific and could limit competition.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the 'Required' status of all tender documents to ensure bidders understand which documents contain mandatory information to be followed.
2. Resolve the inconsistency regarding 'Value Classified' to avoid confusion.
3. Integrate explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria, especially given the EU funding.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes