DIGAR Cultural Heritage Portal Data and Citizen Science Development Stage: Part 1 (User Engagement)
ClosedKey facts
- Estimated value
- €150,000
- Deadline
- Expired
- CPV Code
- 72262000-9 — Software development services
- Procedure
- Open procedure
Original Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
21 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
9 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the requirements for submitting the offer cost, as well as the content for the technical solution concept and action plan, including the timeline, risk mitigation, and team roles.
This document describes the tender evaluation criteria and methodology, focusing on the cost of development work (40%) and the completeness of the technical solution concept and action plan (60%).
This document is an explanatory version of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's conditions for exclusion grounds and qualification criteria, and providing an overview of expected responses, but it is not to be filled out directly.
This draft procurement contract outlines the terms for the DIGAR portal's data and citizen science development stage, defining the rights, obligations, and responsibilities of the contracting authority and the contractor.
This document is a draft annex to the procurement contract, regulating the processing of personal data during the provision of software development services, defining the Estonian National Library as the data controller and the bidder as the authorized processor, and specifying the types of data processed and the purposes of processing.
This document outlines the warranty requirements for software development, including a 12-month warranty period, the obligation to fix errors at the bidder's expense, and deadlines for Estonian-language user support and error resolution.
This document outlines the required composition of the bidder's team and the necessary work experience and previous project participation conditions for each role (Project Manager, System Analyst, Data Scientist/Engineer/Analyst, Software Architect, Senior Developer, Designer, Tester, DevOps/System Administrator).
This document details the technical requirements for the first part of the DIGAR cultural heritage portal's data and citizen science development phase (user involvement), covering detailed analysis, UX/UI, development, testing, and data migration.
No summary available for this document.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This is a generally well-structured tender with clear requirements and transparent evaluation criteria, though the full technical content is difficult to assess due to unanalyzed attached documents. It demonstrates good compliance and fairness, but could improve on explicit sustainability criteria.
Score Breakdown
Legal compliance is generally good, with reasonable deadlines (32 days), appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The tender is EU-funded and utilizes standard practices like ESPD and e-procurement. However, the 'N/A' codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure' are minor ambiguities.
The tender description, AI-extracted requirements, and evaluation criteria are clear and well-documented. Performance conditions, such as warranty and support, are also clearly stated. The primary concern for clarity stems from the inability to analyze the content of the 'Tehniline kirjelduse lisad 1-8' (.zip file), which may contain crucial technical details.
Most essential information, including basic details, financial data, timelines, and location, is comprehensively provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are well-defined. However, the inability to process the content of the technical appendices in the .zip file means the full completeness of the detailed technical specifications cannot be verified from the provided data.
The tender demonstrates good fairness with a disclosed estimated value, reasonable preparation deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria (40% cost, 60% technical solution). E-procurement is enabled, ensuring equal access. While detailed team requirements are specified, they appear appropriate for a complex IT project of this nature and do not inherently suggest tailoring to a specific company.
Electronic submission is supported, and key dates like contract start and duration are clearly specified. Financing information is available. The absence of a direct document URL in the provided data is a minor practical detail for external access, but not a flaw in the tender's accessibility via an e-procurement platform.
Data consistency is high, with all key fields populated and logical, consistent dates for the procurement timeline. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating a stable procurement process.
The tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards. The project itself, focusing on a cultural heritage portal and citizen science, has an inherent innovative and societal value. However, explicit environmental or social sustainability criteria are not mentioned in the tender documentation.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required