← Back to Tenders
Estonia10 days leftOpen

Reconstruction of Maardu Gymnasium building (Ringi 64), Stage IV

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

Maardu Linnavalitsus

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€380,000

DEADLINE

February 12, 2026 at 10:00

CATEGORY

Construction

CPV CODE

45214200-2

REFERENCE

304646

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Hankega soovitakse peatöövõtu korras tähtaegselt ja optimaalsete kuludega rekonstrueerida Maardu Gümnaasiumi B-korpuse esimese korruse dušširuumid ja WC-plokid koos kaasnevate ruumidega, samuti rekonstrueerida teisel ja kolmandal korrusel WC-plokid koos kaasnevate ruumidega ning üldkasutatavad koridorid. Tööde käigus tuleb uuendada kõik tehnovõrgud, mis paiknevad rekonstrueeritavates plokkides ja on nendega ühendatud. Samuti tuleb lammutada olemasolevad WC-plokid koos kaasnevate plokkidega ja olemasolevate tehnovõrkudega,
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Tenderers must not be subject to exclusion grounds as outlined in the ESPD.
  • Tenderer must provide information regarding potential criminal convictions and other exclusion grounds of proposed first-tier subcontractors.
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Acceptance of all tender conditions.
  • Confirmation of the offer's cost and content.
  • Compliance with wage requirements for subcontractors.
  • Adherence to the terms and conditions of the draft procurement contract.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The responsible person for construction works must have at least five years of professional experience.
  • The responsible person for construction works must have managed at least two building construction or reconstruction projects over 1000 m² within the last 60 months.
  • The responsible person for design work must have at least five years of experience in preparing building construction projects.
  • The responsible person for design work must have experience with at least two building construction projects over 1000 m² within the last 60 months.
  • Ability to meet the technical requirements and specifications for the fourth stage of the Maardu Gymnasium building reconstruction.
  • Provide subcontractor data.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Submission of a tender cost according to Annex 1.1 and Form 3.
  • If relying on a third party's economic and financial standing, the third party must confirm joint and several liability for contract performance.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit a completed electronic European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
  • Submit joint tenderers' power of attorney (if applicable).
  • Submit site visit confirmation.
  • Submit tender cost according to Annex 1.1 and Form 3.
  • Submit subcontractor data.
  • Submit a completed bidder's application and confirmation form.
  • Submit the CV of the responsible person for construction works using the provided form.
  • Submit the CV of the responsible person for design work using the provided form.
  • Submit a power of attorney authorizing the bidder's representative to sign the tender submission and the procurement contract.
  • Submit a business secrets declaration form (if applicable), ensuring bid prices and numerical data related to evaluation criteria are not marked as confidential.
  • Submit a joint tenders power of attorney form (if applicable).
  • Submit a third-party reliance form (if applicable).
  • Tender must be submitted by 2026-02-12 10:00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapis
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded304646_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingi...20.7 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the conditions and exclusion grounds for first-tier subcontractors during the contract execution phase, requiring the tenderer to provide information regarding potential criminal convictions and other exclusion grounds of their proposed subcontractors.
PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused304646_vastavustingimused.pdf9.6 KB
Summary:
This document specifies tender submission requirements, including joint tenderers' power of attorney, site visit confirmation, tender cost submission according to Annex 1.1 and Form 3, and the obligation to provide subcontractor data.
XLS
Lisa 1.1. Pakkumuse kululoend
Esitamise VormidLisa 11 - Pakkumuse kululoend.xlsx17.2 KB
Summary:
This document is a tender cost list to be completed with the price offer for design and construction works for the fourth stage of the Maardu Gymnasium B-building reconstruction.
DOC
Vorm 3 - Hankemenetluses osalemise avaldus ja pakkuja kinnitus
VastavusdeklaratsioonVorm 3 - Hankemenetluses osalemise avald...18.9 KB
Summary:
This form is a bidder's application and confirmation, requiring the acceptance of all tender conditions, confirmation of the offer's cost and content, and the declaration of subcontractors along with their compliance with wage requirements.
DOC
Vorm 4.1. - Pakkuja projekteerimistööde eest vastutava isiku CV (Curriculum Vita...
CVVorm 41 - Pakkuja projekteerimistööde ee...20.6 KB
Summary:
This form is for submitting the CV of the bidder's person responsible for design work, which must demonstrate at least five years of experience in preparing building construction projects and experience with at least two building construction projects over 1000 m² within the last 60 months.
DOC
Vorm 4 - Pakkuja ehitustööde eest vastutava isiku CV
CVVorm 4 - Pakkuja ehitutööde eest vastuta...20.5 KB
Summary:
This form is for submitting the CV of the bidder's responsible person for construction works, requiring at least five years of professional experience and management of at least two building construction or reconstruction projects over 1000 m2 within the last 60 months.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid304646_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf2.8 KB
Summary:
This document specifies that the sole evaluation criterion for bids is cost (100%), with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum score.
PDF
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded304646_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitusteg...74.3 KB
Summary:
This explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlines the contracting authority's exclusion grounds and qualification conditions, providing an overview of requirements, but it is not for submission as the actual ESPD must be completed electronically.
DOC
Lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidLisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus.doc618.0 KB
Summary:
The document details the technical requirements and specifications for the fourth stage of the Maardu Gymnasium building reconstruction.
DOC
Lisa 2 - Hankelepingu projekt
Lepingu MallLisa 2 - Hankelepingu projekt (Maardu Gü...51.2 KB
Summary:
This document is a draft procurement contract for the design and reconstruction of the WCs and common corridors in block B of Maardu Gymnasium, outlining the rights and obligations of the Client and the Contractor.
DOC
RHAD Maardu Gümnaasiumi hoone (Ringi tn 64) rekonstrueerimine, IV etapp
Hanke TingimusedRHAD Maardu Gümnaasiumi hoone (Ringi tn ...92.0 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the general terms, requirements, and submission instructions for the public procurement of the Stage IV reconstruction of Maardu Gymnasium building (Ringi 64).
DOC
Vorm 1 - Ühispakkumuse volikiri
VolikiriVorm 1 - Ühispakkumuse volikiri.docx14.1 KB
Summary:
This form is intended for joint tenders, authorizing one bidder to act on behalf and in the interest of other joint bidders in the procurement procedure "Reconstruction of Maardu Gymnasium building (Ringi tn 64), Stage IV".
DOC
Vorm 2 - Pakkuja esindaja volikiri
VolikiriVorm 2 - Pakkuja esindaja volikiri.docx15.3 KB
Summary:
This document is a power of attorney, authorizing the bidder's representative to sign the tender submission and the procurement contract for the 'Maardu Gümnaasiumi hoone (Ringi tn 64) rekonstrueerimine, IV etapp' public procurement.
DOC
Vorm 5 - Teave ärisaladuse kohta
Esitamise VormidVorm 5 - Teave ärisaladuse kohta.docx19.3 KB
Summary:
This form allows bidders to declare and justify which parts of their tender submission are considered business secrets, noting that bid prices and numerical data related to evaluation criteria cannot be marked as confidential.
DOC
Vorm 6 - Teise isiku nõusolek
Esitamise VormidVorm 6 - Teise isiku nõusolek.docx16.9 KB
Summary:
This form is required for bidders who wish to qualify in the public procurement by relying on a third party's economic and financial standing, with the third party confirming joint and several liability for contract performance.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

74
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured and comprehensive, leveraging e-procurement for a school reconstruction project. However, a critical contradiction regarding evaluation criteria significantly impacts clarity and data consistency, requiring urgent clarification.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, including reasonable submission deadlines and the use of standard procurement documents like the ESPD. However, the vague 'Type: E' and 'Procedure: A' codes, along with the contradiction in evaluation criteria, present minor legal risks.

•Vague procedure type codes ('E', 'A' with 'Code: N/A')
•Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative_weighting vs. 100% cost)
Clarity70/100

The project description and most requirements are clear and well-documented. However, the direct contradiction between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' in the basic information and 'sole evaluation criterion for bids is cost (100%)' in Document 11 is a significant flaw that undermines the clarity of the tender process.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative_weighting vs. 100% cost)
Completeness80/100

The tender provides a comprehensive set of information, including all basic details, deadlines, value, and a full suite of 16 documents. Minor vagueness exists regarding the explicit source of financing beyond 'reflected in the procurement contract'.

•Vague financing condition ('Kajastatud hankelepingus' - Reflected in the procurement contract)
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and e-procurement. Technical requirements for key personnel appear reasonable and not tailored. However, the ambiguity in evaluation criteria could potentially lead to an unfair bidding process if not clarified.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria could undermine transparency and fairness
Practicality75/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing practicality for bidders. Key durations are specified. However, the explicit contract start date is not provided, and the financing information could be more specific.

•Contract start date not explicitly stated
•Vague financing information
Data Consistency60/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. The most significant issue is the critical inconsistency between the stated 'relative_weighting' for evaluation criteria and the explicit '100% cost' criterion in the evaluation document, which is a major data integrity concern.

•Major contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative_weighting vs. 100% cost)
Sustainability50/100

The tender includes a positive social aspect by requiring compliance with wage requirements for subcontractors. However, it lacks explicit criteria or focus on broader environmental sustainability (green procurement) or innovation.

•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit innovation focus

Strengths

Comprehensive documentation provided (16 documents)
Full e-procurement support and electronic submission
Clear project description and reasonable technical requirements
Transparent value disclosure and reasonable submission deadlines
Inclusion of social aspects (subcontractor wage compliance)

Concerns

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% cost)
Vague procedure type codes and financing conditions
Lack of explicit green procurement or innovation focus
Contract start date not explicitly stated

Recommendations

1. Immediately issue a clarification or corrigendum to resolve the contradiction in evaluation criteria.
2. Provide more specific details on the financing source and the expected contract start date.
3. Consider integrating explicit environmental sustainability and innovation criteria in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
74/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes