Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction of Maardu Gymnasium building (Ringi 64), Stage IV

Closed

Updated October 12, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
304646
Value
€380,000
Location
Estonia
Published
January 16, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 12, 2026

Tender Opening

February 12, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€380,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
45214200-2 — Construction work for school buildings
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
€380,000
Duration
5 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
74
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Hankega soovitakse peatöövõtu korras tähtaegselt ja optimaalsete kuludega rekonstrueerida Maardu Gümnaasiumi B-korpuse esimese korruse dušširuumid ja WC-plokid koos kaasnevate ruumidega, samuti rekonstrueerida teisel ja kolmandal korrusel WC-plokid koos kaasnevate ruumidega ning üldkasutatavad koridorid. Tööde käigus tuleb uuendada kõik tehnovõrgud, mis paiknevad rekonstrueeritavates plokkides ja on nendega ühendatud. Samuti tuleb lammutada olemasolevad WC-plokid koos kaasnevate plokkidega ja olemasolevate tehnovõrkudega,
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

27 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (13)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (4)
Technical (6)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS13
--Submit a completed electronic European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Submit joint tenderers' power of attorney (if applicable).
--Submit site visit confirmation.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Tenderers must not be subject to exclusion grounds as outlined in the ESPD.
--Tenderer must provide information regarding potential criminal convictions and other exclusion grounds of proposed first-tier subcontractors.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Acceptance of all tender conditions.
--Confirmation of the offer's cost and content.
--Compliance with wage requirements for subcontractors.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--The responsible person for construction works must have at least five years of professional experience.
--The responsible person for construction works must have managed at least two building construction or reconstruction projects over 1000 m² within the last 60 months.
--The responsible person for design work must have at least five years of experience in preparing building construction projects.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Submission of a tender cost according to Annex 1.1 and Form 3.
--If relying on a third party's economic and financial standing, the third party must confirm joint and several liability for contract performance.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

15 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
304646_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions and exclusion grounds for first-tier subcontractors during the contract execution phase, requiring the tenderer to provide information regarding potential criminal convictions and other exclusion grounds of their proposed subcontractors.

VastavustingimusedPDF
304646_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.6 KB

This document specifies tender submission requirements, including joint tenderers' power of attorney, site visit confirmation, tender cost submission according to Annex 1.1 and Form 3, and the obligation to provide subcontractor data.

Lisa 1.1. Pakkumuse kululoendXLS
Lisa 11 - Pakkumuse kululoend.xlsx -- 17.2 KB

This document is a tender cost list to be completed with the price offer for design and construction works for the fourth stage of the Maardu Gymnasium B-building reconstruction.

Vorm 3 - Hankemenetluses osalemise avaldus ja pakkuja kinnitusDOC
Vorm 3 - Hankemenetluses osalemise avaldus ja... -- 18.9 KB

This form is a bidder's application and confirmation, requiring the acceptance of all tender conditions, confirmation of the offer's cost and content, and the declaration of subcontractors along with their compliance with wage requirements.

Vorm 4.1. - Pakkuja projekteerimistööde eest vastutava isiku CV (Curriculum Vita...DOC
Vorm 41 - Pakkuja projekteerimistööde eest va... -- 20.6 KB

This form is for submitting the CV of the bidder's person responsible for design work, which must demonstrate at least five years of experience in preparing building construction projects and experience with at least two building construction projects over 1000 m² within the last 60 months.

Vorm 4 - Pakkuja ehitustööde eest vastutava isiku CVDOC
Vorm 4 - Pakkuja ehitutööde eest vastutava is... -- 20.5 KB

This form is for submitting the CV of the bidder's responsible person for construction works, requiring at least five years of professional experience and management of at least two building construction or reconstruction projects over 1000 m2 within the last 60 months.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304646_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that the sole evaluation criterion for bids is cost (100%), with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304646_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 74.3 KB

This explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlines the contracting authority's exclusion grounds and qualification conditions, providing an overview of requirements, but it is not for submission as the actual ESPD must be completed electronically.

Lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus.doc -- 618.0 KB

The document details the technical requirements and specifications for the fourth stage of the Maardu Gymnasium building reconstruction.

Lisa 2 - Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 - Hankelepingu projekt (Maardu Gümnaas... -- 51.2 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract for the design and reconstruction of the WCs and common corridors in block B of Maardu Gymnasium, outlining the rights and obligations of the Client and the Contractor.

RHAD Maardu Gümnaasiumi hoone (Ringi tn 64) rekonstrueerimine, IV etappDOC
RHAD Maardu Gümnaasiumi hoone (Ringi tn 64) r... -- 92.0 KB

This document outlines the general terms, requirements, and submission instructions for the public procurement of the Stage IV reconstruction of Maardu Gymnasium building (Ringi 64).

Vorm 1 - Ühispakkumuse volikiriDOC
Vorm 1 - Ühispakkumuse volikiri.docx -- 14.1 KB

This form is intended for joint tenders, authorizing one bidder to act on behalf and in the interest of other joint bidders in the procurement procedure "Reconstruction of Maardu Gymnasium building (Ringi tn 64), Stage IV".

Vorm 2 - Pakkuja esindaja volikiriDOC
Vorm 2 - Pakkuja esindaja volikiri.docx -- 15.3 KB

This document is a power of attorney, authorizing the bidder's representative to sign the tender submission and the procurement contract for the 'Maardu Gümnaasiumi hoone (Ringi tn 64) rekonstrueerimine, IV etapp' public procurement.

Vorm 5 - Teave ärisaladuse kohtaDOC
Vorm 5 - Teave ärisaladuse kohta.docx -- 19.3 KB

This form allows bidders to declare and justify which parts of their tender submission are considered business secrets, noting that bid prices and numerical data related to evaluation criteria cannot be marked as confidential.

Vorm 6 - Teise isiku nõusolekDOC
Vorm 6 - Teise isiku nõusolek.docx -- 16.9 KB

This form is required for bidders who wish to qualify in the public procurement by relying on a third party's economic and financial standing, with the third party confirming joint and several liability for contract performance.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

74
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured and comprehensive, leveraging e-procurement for a school reconstruction project. However, a critical contradiction regarding evaluation criteria significantly impacts clarity and data consistency, requiring urgent clarification.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, including reasonable submission deadlines and the use of standard procurement documents like the ESPD. However, the vague 'Type: E' and 'Procedure: A' codes, along with the contradiction in evaluation criteria, present minor legal risks.

•Vague procedure type codes ('E', 'A' with 'Code: N/A')
•Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative_weighting vs. 100% cost)
Clarity70/100

The project description and most requirements are clear and well-documented. However, the direct contradiction between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' in the basic information and 'sole evaluation criterion for bids is cost (100%)' in Document 11 is a significant flaw that undermines the clarity of the tender process.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative_weighting vs. 100% cost)
Completeness80/100

The tender provides a comprehensive set of information, including all basic details, deadlines, value, and a full suite of 16 documents. Minor vagueness exists regarding the explicit source of financing beyond 'reflected in the procurement contract'.

•Vague financing condition ('Kajastatud hankelepingus' - Reflected in the procurement contract)
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and e-procurement. Technical requirements for key personnel appear reasonable and not tailored. However, the ambiguity in evaluation criteria could potentially lead to an unfair bidding process if not clarified.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria could undermine transparency and fairness
Practicality75/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing practicality for bidders. Key durations are specified. However, the explicit contract start date is not provided, and the financing information could be more specific.

•Contract start date not explicitly stated
•Vague financing information
Data Consistency60/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. The most significant issue is the critical inconsistency between the stated 'relative_weighting' for evaluation criteria and the explicit '100% cost' criterion in the evaluation document, which is a major data integrity concern.

•Major contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative_weighting vs. 100% cost)
Sustainability50/100

The tender includes a positive social aspect by requiring compliance with wage requirements for subcontractors. However, it lacks explicit criteria or focus on broader environmental sustainability (green procurement) or innovation.

•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit innovation focus

Strengths

Comprehensive documentation provided (16 documents)
Full e-procurement support and electronic submission
Clear project description and reasonable technical requirements
Transparent value disclosure and reasonable submission deadlines
Inclusion of social aspects (subcontractor wage compliance)

Concerns

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% cost)
Vague procedure type codes and financing conditions
Lack of explicit green procurement or innovation focus
Contract start date not explicitly stated

Recommendations

1. Immediately issue a clarification or corrigendum to resolve the contradiction in evaluation criteria.
2. Provide more specific details on the financing source and the expected contract start date.
3. Consider integrating explicit environmental sustainability and innovation criteria in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes