Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginGet an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginUpgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login27 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
15 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the conditions and exclusion grounds for first-tier subcontractors during the contract execution phase, requiring the tenderer to provide information regarding potential criminal convictions and other exclusion grounds of their proposed subcontractors.
This document specifies tender submission requirements, including joint tenderers' power of attorney, site visit confirmation, tender cost submission according to Annex 1.1 and Form 3, and the obligation to provide subcontractor data.
This document is a tender cost list to be completed with the price offer for design and construction works for the fourth stage of the Maardu Gymnasium B-building reconstruction.
This form is a bidder's application and confirmation, requiring the acceptance of all tender conditions, confirmation of the offer's cost and content, and the declaration of subcontractors along with their compliance with wage requirements.
This form is for submitting the CV of the bidder's person responsible for design work, which must demonstrate at least five years of experience in preparing building construction projects and experience with at least two building construction projects over 1000 m² within the last 60 months.
This form is for submitting the CV of the bidder's responsible person for construction works, requiring at least five years of professional experience and management of at least two building construction or reconstruction projects over 1000 m2 within the last 60 months.
This document specifies that the sole evaluation criterion for bids is cost (100%), with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum score.
This explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlines the contracting authority's exclusion grounds and qualification conditions, providing an overview of requirements, but it is not for submission as the actual ESPD must be completed electronically.
The document details the technical requirements and specifications for the fourth stage of the Maardu Gymnasium building reconstruction.
This document is a draft procurement contract for the design and reconstruction of the WCs and common corridors in block B of Maardu Gymnasium, outlining the rights and obligations of the Client and the Contractor.
This document outlines the general terms, requirements, and submission instructions for the public procurement of the Stage IV reconstruction of Maardu Gymnasium building (Ringi 64).
This form is intended for joint tenders, authorizing one bidder to act on behalf and in the interest of other joint bidders in the procurement procedure "Reconstruction of Maardu Gymnasium building (Ringi tn 64), Stage IV".
This document is a power of attorney, authorizing the bidder's representative to sign the tender submission and the procurement contract for the 'Maardu Gümnaasiumi hoone (Ringi tn 64) rekonstrueerimine, IV etapp' public procurement.
This form allows bidders to declare and justify which parts of their tender submission are considered business secrets, noting that bid prices and numerical data related to evaluation criteria cannot be marked as confidential.
This form is required for bidders who wish to qualify in the public procurement by relying on a third party's economic and financial standing, with the third party confirming joint and several liability for contract performance.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender is generally well-structured and comprehensive, leveraging e-procurement for a school reconstruction project. However, a critical contradiction regarding evaluation criteria significantly impacts clarity and data consistency, requiring urgent clarification.
The tender generally complies with legal requirements, including reasonable submission deadlines and the use of standard procurement documents like the ESPD. However, the vague 'Type: E' and 'Procedure: A' codes, along with the contradiction in evaluation criteria, present minor legal risks.
The project description and most requirements are clear and well-documented. However, the direct contradiction between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' in the basic information and 'sole evaluation criterion for bids is cost (100%)' in Document 11 is a significant flaw that undermines the clarity of the tender process.
The tender provides a comprehensive set of information, including all basic details, deadlines, value, and a full suite of 16 documents. Minor vagueness exists regarding the explicit source of financing beyond 'reflected in the procurement contract'.
The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and e-procurement. Technical requirements for key personnel appear reasonable and not tailored. However, the ambiguity in evaluation criteria could potentially lead to an unfair bidding process if not clarified.
The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing practicality for bidders. Key durations are specified. However, the explicit contract start date is not provided, and the financing information could be more specific.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. The most significant issue is the critical inconsistency between the stated 'relative_weighting' for evaluation criteria and the explicit '100% cost' criterion in the evaluation document, which is a major data integrity concern.
The tender includes a positive social aspect by requiring compliance with wage requirements for subcontractors. However, it lacks explicit criteria or focus on broader environmental sustainability (green procurement) or innovation.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required