Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Owner Supervision Service for the Design and Construction Works of Põltsamaa Municipality's Nearly Zero-Energy Sports and Service Building and Mountain Sports Slopes

Closed

Updated October 16, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
304645
Value
€30,000
Location
Estonia
Published
January 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 28, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 09, 2026

Tender Opening

February 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€30,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
71310000-4 — Consultative engineering and construction services
Procedure
Simplified procedure
Budget
€30,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
78
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Hanke objektiks on omanikujärelevalve teenuse osutamine hankele "Põltsamaa valla liginullenergia spordi- ja teenushoone (sh ujula) projekteerimis- ja ehitustööd" (viitenr. 302693, eeldatav maksumus 4 500 000€) ning Kuningamäe kompleksi arendusega seotud ehitushangetele, sh mäespordinõlvade ehitus koos tõstukite, valgustuse ja lumekahurite süsteemiga vastavalt hanke tehnilisele kirjeldusele. Mäe ehituse osas on I etapi tööde leping RH 303112 alusel sõlmimisel. Tööde mahus on muuhulgas RH 302693 läbirääkimistel osalemine, tehniliste lahenduste analüüs, vajadusel optimeerimisettepanekute tegemine jm.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

23 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (10)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (4)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--Submit a power of attorney if submitting a joint bid.
--Declare business secrets if applicable.
--Present the cost structure of the bid.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) contains conditions set by the contracting authority, which typically include mandatory exclusion grounds. Specific exclusion grounds are not detailed in the provided AI summaries due to the .xml file format not being supported for analysis.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bid must comply with all basic documents and tender conditions.
--The bidder must understand the tasks of the owner supervision service.
--The bid must be valid.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The provider must be capable of delivering owner supervision services for the design and construction works of Põltsamaa rural municipality's near-zero energy sports and service building and ski slopes.
--The service must include checking project documentation.
--The service must include advising the client.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid cost must be submitted without VAT for evaluation purposes.
--The bid cost form must include advisory and supervision services, including VAT.
--The total bid cost is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
304645_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.1 KB

This document outlines essential tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint tenderers' power of attorney, declaration of business secrets, confirmation of compliance with tender documents, cost structure, and principles of equivalence.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304645_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

This document describes the tender evaluation methodology, where the sole evaluation criterion is the total offer cost without VAT, which is given a 100% weight, and the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304645_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 41.2 KB

This document is an explanatory guide for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions, procurement procedure information, and an overview of the expected response format from the economic operator, intended for review, not for completion.

Lisa 1.3 Projekt "Kuningamäe taristu"SIG
24158_Kuningamae_taristu.asice -- 37.7 MB

No summary available for this document.

Hankedokument sh käsunduslepingu projektPDF
Hankedokument (sh lisa 2).pdf -- 190.1 KB

Põltsamaa Vallavara OÜ is seeking an owner supervision service provider for the design and construction of a nearly zero-energy sports and service building and ski slopes, including advising the client during tender negotiations, in accordance with applicable legislation.

Lisa 1.1 Kuningamäe spordikompleksi arhitektuurne eelprojekt (sh energiamärgis)ZIP
Lisa 11.zip -- 12.6 MB

No summary available for this document.

Lisa 1.2 Sisearhitektuurne projektZIP
Lisa 12_SA_EP_PDF.zip -- 7.5 MB

No summary available for this document.

Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 144.6 KB

This technical description details the scope of owner supervision services for the design and construction of Põltsamaa municipality's near-zero energy sports and service building and ski slopes, including project documentation review and client advisory.

Lisa 3. Pakkumuse maksumuse vormDOC
Lisa 3 Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm.docx -- 15.7 KB

This form is for submitting the cost proposal for owner supervision services, including consultation and supervision works, with VAT.

Vorm 1 - KinnitusDOC
Vorm 1_Kinnitus.docx -- 23.7 KB

Bidders must submit this confirmation form to declare their full understanding and acceptance of all tender conditions, the scope of owner supervision services, and the validity of their submitted offer.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

78
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for owner supervision services is generally well-structured and transparent, particularly regarding its clear evaluation criteria and fair process. However, the inability to access detailed content of key project documents for analysis and the lack of explicit sustainability criteria for the service provider are notable areas for improvement.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance80/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type (LM) and CPV codes, and indicates EU funding, suggesting compliance with relevant regulations. The use of ESPD is a good practice. However, the specific mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed in the AI summary due to XML format, which, while not a tender flaw, means full visibility of these critical legal aspects is not available in the provided text.

•Specific mandatory exclusion grounds not detailed in AI summary (due to XML format limitations for analysis).
Clarity85/100

The tender description is clear, and the evaluation criteria are exceptionally well-defined as solely based on the lowest price. Requirements are structured and generally understandable, with principles of equivalence noted.

Completeness65/100

While all basic information, financial details, and deadlines are present, the AI's inability to process key project documents (architectural, interior design, infrastructure projects in .zip and .asice formats) means a significant portion of the technical context for the supervision service is not accessible for this analysis. This limits the assessment of the tender's overall completeness from the provided data.

•Key project documents (.zip, .asice) content not accessible for AI analysis, limiting full understanding of the project scope.
Fairness90/100

The tender demonstrates high fairness with full document access (implied), disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, objective and transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price), and enabled e-procurement. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.

Practicality75/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. Financing information and contract duration are clearly specified. The absence of an explicit contract start date is common but could be a minor point for planning.

•Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency95/100

All key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent throughout the provided information.

Sustainability50/100

While the underlying project (near-zero energy building) is inherently sustainable, the tender for the owner supervision service itself does not explicitly include green procurement, social, or innovation criteria for the service provider. The EU funding is a positive but doesn't compensate for the lack of specific sustainability requirements for the service.

•No explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria for the service provider.

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
High transparency and fairness, including disclosed value and e-procurement.
Good data consistency and logical timeline.
EU funded, implying adherence to higher standards.
Detailed description of the service scope.

Concerns

Specific mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed in the AI summary due to XML format.
Key project documents (architectural, interior design, infrastructure) are not accessible for AI content analysis, limiting full understanding.
Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria for the supervision service itself.
Contract start date is not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all critical legal documents, including specific exclusion grounds, are easily accessible and parsable for comprehensive review.
2. For future tenders, explicitly integrate green, social, or innovation criteria relevant to the service provider, even for supervision roles.
3. Consider providing an estimated contract start date to aid bidder planning.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes