Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Toiduainete ostmine

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
304562
Value
€2,000,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 10, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Quality of offered goods100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 12, 2026

Tender Opening

March 12, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€2,000,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€24,020
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
882 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Toiduainete ostmine Tehvandi Spordikeskuse restorani ja kohvikusse ning Kääriku Spordikeskuse sööklasse
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for foodstuff procurement for Tehvandi and Kääriku Sports Centers presents a moderate competition opportunity. Success hinges on demonstrating robust supply chain capabilities, unwavering compliance with sanctions, and a strong emphasis on product quality. While social value and innovation are not explicitly required, incorporating them can provide a competitive edge.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and High-Quality Food Supply for Elite Sports Environments

Unwavering Compliance and Ethical Sourcing

Catering to Diverse Palates with Excellence

Key Opportunities
The 100% weight on quality of offered goods allows for significant differentiation through detailed product descriptions and high-quality certifications.
The absence of explicit financial requirements suggests that technical capability and quality will be the primary drivers of the award, leveling the playing field for technically strong bidders.
The requirement to cater to 'highly varied target groups (different nationalities with diverse food cultures)' and 'different purposes and times' opens opportunities for bidders with flexible sourcing and menu planning capabilities.
Key Challenges
The lack of specified evaluation criteria beyond the 100% quality weighting creates uncertainty regarding how other aspects like price or service will be considered, if at all.

Focus intensely on exceeding quality expectations with detailed product specifications and certifications. Assume that price will be a secondary consideration but ensure competitive pricing to avoid being overlooked if it becomes a tie-breaker or implicit factor.

The strict prohibition of subcontractors and suppliers subject to EU sanctions against Russia and Belarus requires thorough due diligence across the entire supply chain.

Implement a robust supplier vetting process that explicitly checks for sanctions compliance. Maintain clear documentation of this vetting for all direct and indirect suppliers.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established food supplier with a proven track record in catering to diverse groups and large-scale events. The ideal bidder possesses a strong, verifiable supply chain, a deep understanding of food safety and quality standards, and a demonstrated commitment to ethical sourcing and compliance with international regulations, particularly regarding sanctions against Russia and Belarus. Experience with sports facilities or similar institutional catering is a significant advantage.
Key Requirements
Ability to supply various food items (bread, fish, meat, vegetables, dairy, and dry goods) for catering services.
Quality of offered goods is a 100% evaluation criterion, based on product descriptions and attached certificates.
Prohibition of involving subcontractors and suppliers subject to EU sanctions against Russia and Belarus.
Prohibition of offering sanctioned goods.
Confirmation of the bidder's location in accordance with EU sanctions against Russia and Belarus.
Submission of product descriptions and relevant certificates for the offered goods.
Submission of mandatory form 'Lisa 3 Vorm I Osalemise avaldus'.
Key Discriminators
Exceptional product quality backed by premium certifications and detailed provenance information.
Demonstrated ability to cater to a wide range of dietary needs and cultural preferences with a flexible and adaptable supply chain.
Proactive and transparent compliance with all sanction regulations, providing clear evidence of due diligence.
A commitment to sustainability and ethical sourcing, even if not explicitly required, can be a differentiator.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to sourcing a percentage of products from local Estonian producers to support the local economy and reduce food miles, even if not explicitly mandated. This can be framed as enhancing freshness and supporting community resilience.
Bid Focus Areas
Quality of offered goods100%

Provide highly detailed product descriptions for every item offered, emphasizing freshness, origin, and any unique selling points. Attach all relevant quality certificates (e.g., ISO, HACCP, organic, regional quality marks). For meat and fish, specify breed/species and origin. For produce, highlight seasonality and local sourcing where possible. For dry goods, emphasize origin and quality standards.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Document Sanctions Compliance
CriticalMed effort

Ensure all subcontractors and suppliers are rigorously vetted for compliance with EU sanctions against Russia and Belarus. Prepare clear documentation to demonstrate this due diligence, as required by the eligibility criteria.

Ensures eligibility and avoids mandatory exclusion.
Maximize Quality Score with Detailed Submissions
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weight on quality, invest significant effort in crafting detailed product descriptions and gathering comprehensive, high-quality certifications for all offered food items. Highlight freshness, origin, and any unique quality attributes.

Directly maximizes the evaluation score.
Showcase Catering Flexibility for Diverse Groups
HighMed effort

Emphasize the ability to cater to diverse national cuisines and dietary needs. Provide examples of how past experience has prepared the bidder to meet the varied requirements of international sports teams and events.

Addresses a key technical capability requirement and differentiates from less adaptable competitors.
Complete Mandatory Forms Accurately
HighLow effort

Ensure 'Lisa 3 Vorm I Osalemise avaldus' and any other mandatory forms are filled out completely, accurately, and on time. Pay close attention to all confirmation questions regarding eligibility and compliance.

Prevents disqualification due to administrative errors.
Propose Local Sourcing Commitment
MediumLow effort

Include a commitment to sourcing a portion of goods (e.g., seasonal produce, dairy) from local Estonian suppliers. Frame this as enhancing freshness, supporting the local economy, and aligning with the spirit of a national sports center.

Adds a positive, albeit unmandated, dimension to the bid, potentially influencing perception.
Establish a Robust Supplier Due Diligence Process
HighMed effort

Develop and document a clear process for vetting all suppliers (direct and indirect) to ensure they are not subject to EU sanctions. This process should be repeatable and auditable.

Mitigates the risk of disqualification due to sanctions violations.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and quality-focused supplier, emphasizing a deep understanding of the needs of sports centers and diverse international clientele. Highlight a proactive approach to compliance and ethical sourcing to build trust and demonstrate a superior understanding of the tender's core requirements.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Submission deadline is 2026-03-12 at 10:00:00.
--Confirmation of the bidder's location and compliance with sanction rules must be submitted (via necessary submission forms).
--Product descriptions and relevant certificates for the offered goods must be submitted.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Prohibition of involving subcontractors and suppliers subject to EU sanctions against Russia and Belarus.
--Prohibition of offering sanctioned goods.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must confirm its location in accordance with EU sanctions against Russia and Belarus.
--The bidder must meet the qualification and requirement fulfillment criteria as presented in the participation application form.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be able to supply various food items (bread, fish, meat, vegetables, dairy, and dry goods) for catering services at Tehvandi and Kääriku Sports Centers.
--The quality of offered goods is a 100% evaluation criterion, based on product descriptions and attached certificates.
--Must be able to provide catering for highly varied target groups (different nationalities with diverse food cultures) and for different purposes and times (year-round training camps, international competitions).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No explicit financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, financial ratios) were identified from the provided summaries.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
304562_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.0 KB

This document sets out mandatory compliance conditions for the tenderer regarding EU sanctions against Russia and Belarus, prohibiting the involvement of certain subcontractors and suppliers, the offering of sanctioned goods, and requiring confirmation of the tenderer's location, also referencing necessary submission forms.

Lisa 3 Vorm IIDOC
Lisa 3 Vorm II Esindaja volikiri.doc -- 46.5 KB

Tender document 'Lisa 3 Vorm II' in .DOC format (47,616 bytes).

Lisa 3 Vorm IIIDOC
Lisa 3 Vorm III Ühispakkujate volikiri.doc -- 46.5 KB

This document, Annex 3 Form III, is a mandatory submission form for bidders to demonstrate compliance with criteria for the foodstuff procurement.

Lisa 3 Vorm IDOC
Lisa 3 Vorm I Osalemise avaldus.doc -- 62.5 KB

This document is a mandatory form (Annex 3 Form I) for tender submission, containing criterion questions regarding qualifications and compliance with requirements.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304562_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.7 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, focusing 100% on the quality of offered goods, which will be assessed based on product descriptions and attached certificates.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304562_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 64.7 KB

This document is an explanatory guide for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the conditions for bidder qualification and exclusion, but it is not to be filled out or submitted.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus ja lähteülesanneDOC
Lisa1 Tehniline kirjeldus ja lähteülesanne.do... -- 27.3 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements and objectives for the procurement of food products, including bread, fish, meat, vegetables, dairy, and dry goods, needed for the catering services of Tehvandi Sports Center and Kääriku Sports Center.

Lisa 2 Raamlepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Raamlepingu projekt.docx -- 39.7 KB

This document is a draft framework agreement for the purchase of foodstuffs and related goods for SA Tehvandi Spordikeskus's catering services, outlining the terms and obligations between the client and the supplier.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.docx -- 28.3 KB

This document is an invitation from SA Tehvandi Spordikeskus to submit a tender for the procurement of foodstuffs, providing general information and referring to technical specifications and contract terms in appendices.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender demonstrates good practical execution and data consistency, but could improve in legal compliance regarding CPV codes, clarity of evaluation sub-criteria, and integration of sustainability aspects. The overall quality is moderate to good.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance70/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, including sanctions. However, the assigned CPV code (346 - Animal products, meat and meat products) appears too narrow for the described scope of 'various food items' (bread, fish, meat, vegetables, dairy, dry goods). The specific procurement procedure type is coded but not explicitly named, which could be clearer.

•CPV code (346) is too narrow for the described scope of food items.
•Specific procurement procedure type is not explicitly named in basic info, only coded and 'Negotiation Allowed' mentioned.
Clarity75/100

The overall description of needs is clear, emphasizing the varied requirements of the sports centers. The evaluation criterion of '100% quality' is stated, but the detailed sub-criteria for assessing this quality, based on product descriptions and certificates, are not explicitly summarized, which could lead to ambiguity for bidders.

•Lack of detailed sub-criteria for the '100% quality' evaluation, potentially leading to ambiguity for bidders.
Completeness70/100

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are comprehensively provided. However, the AI summaries for two mandatory submission forms (Lisa 3 Vorm II and Vorm III) lack content, and the XML ESPD is not analyzed, which limits a full assessment of all required submission details from the provided information.

•AI summaries for mandatory forms (Lisa 3 Vorm II, Vorm III) lack content, hindering full assessment of submission requirements.
•XML ESPD document content not analyzed.
Fairness75/100

The tender appears fair with disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and e-procurement. Requirements do not seem tailored to a specific company. However, the 100% quality evaluation criterion, while transparent in its weighting, requires very detailed and objective sub-criteria to ensure fair and consistent assessment across all bidders.

•Potential for subjective interpretation in the 100% quality evaluation if sub-criteria are not sufficiently detailed and objective.
Practicality90/100

The tender scores highly on practicality, with electronic submission supported, a clear document URL, a specified contract start date, and financing information linked to the draft contract. The duration is also clearly defined.

Data Consistency95/100

All key fields are populated, there are no detected issues or disputes, and all dates are logical and consistent. This indicates excellent data integrity.

Sustainability30/100

The tender lacks explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While the description mentions 'modern trends' in catering, this is not formalized into a sustainability or innovation criterion.

•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear estimated value and contract duration.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Reasonable submission deadline (over 30 days).
Explicit compliance with EU sanctions against Russia and Belarus.
High data consistency with all key fields populated and logical dates.

Concerns

CPV code (346) is too narrow for the broad scope of food items required.
Lack of detailed sub-criteria for the '100% quality' evaluation, potentially impacting fairness and clarity.
Absence of explicit sustainability (green, social) or innovation criteria.
AI summaries for some mandatory forms lack content, limiting full assessment of submission requirements.

Recommendations

1. Review and update CPV codes to accurately reflect the broad range of food items required.
2. Provide more detailed and objective sub-criteria for the 'quality' evaluation to enhance transparency and fairness for bidders.
3. Consider integrating sustainability (green, social) and innovation aspects into the tender requirements or evaluation criteria.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes