Production and broadcasting of the 5th season of the TV show TeadusEST
ClosedKey facts
- Estimated value
- €132,000
- Deadline
- Expired
- CPV Code
- 92221000-6 — Television production services
Original Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
21 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
9 documents available with AI summaries
This document specifies the tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint bid authorization, business secret declarations, the TV series concept, and team composition, with references to necessary forms.
Bidders must submit CVs for the presenter, director, producer, and editor (and additional members if needed), detailing their education and experience in TV production, especially with nationwide shows.
Bidders must submit a TV series concept, team description, cross-media usage plan, content description, and a sample episode scenario based on specified research projects.
This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria and their weights (cost 20%, concept 40%, team 25%, cross-media usage 15%) for the TV series production procurement.
Bidders must confirm they have no national tax, payment, or environmental fee tax debt to avoid exclusion from the procurement procedure.
This document is a draft contract outlining the terms for the production and broadcasting of the 5th season of the "TeadusEST" TV series, including the number of episodes, clips, deadlines, and payment basis.
This document details the evaluation criteria and scoring system for bids for the production of the 5th season of the "TeadusEST" TV show, focusing on the concept, team, and cross-media strategy.
```json
{
"summary_ee": "Dokument kirjeldab "TeadusEST" telesaate 5. hooaja tootmise ja eetrisse andmise tehnilisi nõudeid, eesmärke, formaati ja oodatavat vaatajaskonda, et kajastada teadust lihtsas ja arusaadavas keeles.",
"summary_en": "This document outlines the technical requirements, objectives, format, and expected viewership for the production and broadcasting of the 5th season of the \"TeadusEST\" TV series, aiming to present science in a simple and understandable language.",
"summary_lv": "Šis dokuments apraksta tehniskās prasības, mērķus, formātu un paredzamo skatītāju skaitu \"TeadusEST\" televīzijas seriāla 5. sezonas ražošanai un pārraidīšanai, lai vienkāršā un saprotamā valodā atspoguļotu zinātni.",
"is_required": false,
"document_type": "Tehnilised Spetsifikatsioonid"
}
```
```json
{
"summary_ee": "Dokument kirjeldab väikehanke üldpõhimõtteid ja korda telesaatesarja „TeadusEST“ 12 saate ja klippide tootmiseks, rõhutades pakkumuste esitamise tingimusi ja läbirääkimiste võimalust.",
"summary_en": "This document outlines the general principles and procedures for a small procurement for the production of 12 'TeadusEST' TV episodes and clips, detailing tender submission conditions and the possibility of negotiations.",
"summary_lv": "Šis dokuments izklāsta vispārīgos principus un procedūras mazam iepirkumam 12 "TeadusEST" TV epizožu un klipu ražošanai, detalizējot piedāvājumu iesniegšanas nosacījumus un sarunu iespējamību.",
"is_required": false,
"document_type": "Hanke Tingimused"
}
```
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender for the production of the "TeadusEST" TV series is generally well-structured and clear, with transparent evaluation criteria and reasonable timelines. While strong in clarity and fairness, minor inconsistencies regarding the exact number of episodes and a lack of explicit sustainability criteria are noted.
Score Breakdown
The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable deadlines, a clearly defined procedure (small procurement), and appropriate CPV codes. Mandatory disclosure requirements are met, and there are no detected disputes. The EU funding characteristic suggests adherence to broader regulatory frameworks.
The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-documented across multiple supporting documents. Evaluation criteria, including weights and scoring principles, are explicitly detailed, providing transparency for bidders. AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and easy to understand.
The tender provides all essential basic information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration. A comprehensive set of 9 documents supports the tender, detailing requirements, evaluation criteria, and the draft contract. Minor gaps exist in the explicit coding of the procedure type in the basic information.
The tender promotes fairness through full value disclosure, reasonable submission deadlines, and transparent, objective evaluation criteria with specified weights. E-procurement is enabled, ensuring equal access. While technical requirements for key personnel (experience with nationwide shows) are specific, they appear justifiable for a national TV series and do not seem overtly tailored to a single company.
Electronic submission is supported, and financing conditions are clearly detailed. The contract duration is specified, and the general timeframe for the TV season is known. However, an explicit document URL is not provided in the summary, and the exact contract start date is implied rather than explicitly stated, which could require further investigation by bidders.
Most key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent. However, there is a notable inconsistency regarding the exact number of episodes to be produced, with different parts of the tender mentioning 9, 10 (optional), and 12 episodes. This could lead to confusion for bidders.
The tender is EU funded, which often implies higher standards. However, it explicitly lacks specific criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus beyond a cross-media usage plan. While not always mandatory for this type of service, their absence represents a missed opportunity for a more comprehensive sustainability approach.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required