Rakvere linna sademeveekraavide rekonstrueerimistööd
ClosedKey facts
- Estimated value
- €400,000
- Deadline
- Expired
- CPV Code
- 45233300-2 — Foundation work for highways, roads, streets and footpaths
- Procedure
- Open procedure
Original Tender Description
Run Risk Analysis
Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.
LoginWin Strategy
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginCompetitors
Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
LoginRequirements & Qualifications
25 requirements across 5 categories
Requirements Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Documents
9 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors and the grounds for their exclusion during the contract performance phase, requiring bidders to provide information on subcontractors' qualifications and potential criminal convictions.
This document outlines the conditions for bid submission, including requirements for joint bidders' power of attorney, submission of the bid cost breakdown (Annex 4), bidder confirmations (Annex 3), and declarations regarding subcontractors and bid compliance.
This document is an application form for participation in the public procurement and bidder's confirmations, including agreement with tender conditions, confirmation of meeting qualification requirements, and the option to provide subcontractor details.
This cost list is a tender submission form where the bidder must provide unit prices and total costs for the general works involved in the reconstruction of stormwater ditches.
This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the Rakvere city stormwater ditch reconstruction works, where the sole criterion is the bid price (100%), with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
This explanatory Hankepass (ESPD) details the contracting authority's conditions for exclusion grounds and qualification criteria for the Rakvere city stormwater ditch reconstruction works, which bidders must complete electronically in the information system.
This document is a draft contract for the reconstruction works of stormwater ditches in Rakvere city, outlining the terms and obligations of the parties.
This document provides a link to the project documentation for the reconstruction works of Rakvere city's stormwater ditches, essential for preparing a tender submission.
This document outlines the technical requirements for the reconstruction of Rakvere city's stormwater ditches, including qualification criteria, subcontracting conditions, and traffic management.
Documents Preview
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
Tender Quality Score
This tender for stormwater ditch reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear requirements, but suffers from significant ambiguities regarding the procurement procedure type and a lack of explicit contract duration.
Score Breakdown
The tender demonstrates compliance with basic legal requirements, including reasonable submission deadlines and proper CPV code assignment. However, the combination of 'Procedure: A' with 'Negotiation Allowed' creates a significant ambiguity regarding the exact procurement procedure type, which could lead to legal challenges if 'A' refers to an open procedure where negotiation is typically not permitted.
The tender's description, requirements, and evaluation criteria are generally clear and well-documented, with specific annexes referenced for detailed information. The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive. The main detractor from clarity is the ambiguity surrounding the procurement procedure type.
Most essential information, including title, organization, reference, value, and deadlines, is provided. All listed documents are attached. However, a critical omission is the explicit contract duration, which is vital for bidders to accurately plan and price their proposals.
The tender exhibits strong fairness, offering full document access, disclosing the estimated value, and setting objective and transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price). Electronic submission is enabled, ensuring equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to any specific company.
The tender supports electronic submission, provides a link to crucial project documentation, specifies a contract start date, and confirms EU funding. The primary practical drawback is the absence of a clear contract duration, which complicates bid preparation and resource allocation for potential contractors.
While dates are logical and most key fields are populated without disputes, there are notable inconsistencies. The most significant is the contradiction between 'Procedure: A' and 'Negotiation Allowed'. Additionally, 'Value Classified: Yes' contradicts the explicit disclosure of the 'Estimated Value'.
The tender is EU-funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, it lacks explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a missed opportunity to actively promote sustainability objectives.
Strengths
Concerns
Recommendations
AI Scoring Preview
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
AI Copilot
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required