Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Feasibility study of interventions targeted at children with autism spectrum disorder and speech delay and their families for the Ministry of Social Affairs

Closed

Updated October 16, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
300008
Value
€100,000
Location
Estonia
Published
January 21, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Technical solution70%
Service cost without VAT30%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 21, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 20, 2026

Tender Opening

February 20, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€100,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
73200000-4 — Research and development consultancy services
Procedure
Open procedure
Budget
€100,000
Duration
13 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
78
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€40,919
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
95%
495 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The Ministry of Social Affairs is commissioning a feasibility study of interventions targeted at children with anxiety disorders and their families. The feasibility study of the piloted intervention will assess the feasibility of the intervention in Estonia, evaluate its impact on children and their families, and, if necessary, make changes/additions to better suit Estonian conditions.
Green ProcurementEU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

20 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (6)
Technical (6)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The bid must be submitted electronically.
--Submit a completed European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Submit a signed CV for each research team member using the provided form.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly mentioned in the tender summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Submit a power of attorney if submitting a joint bid.
--Declare any business secrets.
--Confirm the bid's compliance with tender conditions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Conduct a feasibility study on interventions targeted at children with autism spectrum disorder and speech delay, and their families.
--The study's objective must be clearly defined and meet the contracting authority's needs to improve the accessibility and effectiveness of speech therapy services.
--The bid must include a technical solution, which accounts for 70% of the evaluation criteria.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid must include the service cost, which accounts for 30% of the evaluation criteria.
--The bidder must have the financial capability to perform the contract (no specific requirements detailed in the summaries).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
300008_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.3 KB

This document outlines tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint bid power of attorney, declaration of business secrets, confirmation of bid compliance, and submission of authorized personnel data, also emphasizing the preference for environmentally friendly solutions during contract execution.

Pakkuja esitab uuringurühma liikme allkirjastatud CV (alusdokumentides leitaval ...DOC
CV_vorm.docx -- 46.6 KB

The tenderer must submit a signed CV for each research team member, containing the required information to assess their qualifications and experience according to the tender conditions.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
300008_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.3 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria and methodology for the feasibility study tender on interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder and speech delay, where the technical solution accounts for 70% and service cost for 30%.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
300008_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.4 KB

This document explains the content and requirements of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the information expected from companies regarding their general, financial, and technical capacity, and past experience for tender qualification, noting that this PDF is for informational purposes only and the actual submission is electronic.

LisateaveDOC
300008_Lisateave (1).docx -- 169.0 KB

This document clarifies that the State Shared Service Centre is procuring a feasibility study for the Ministry of Social Affairs, which will not be divided into parts, and provides instructions for submitting proposals, marking business secrets, and evaluating bids.

AndmetöötluslepingDOC
Andmetöötlusleping (3).docx -- 41.1 KB

This document is an appendix to the main contract, outlining the terms for processing personal data and the parties' obligations under GDPR, forming an integral part of the service contract to be concluded as a result of the tender.

CV vormDOC
CV_vorm (2).docx -- 53.4 KB

This document is a CV form that must be submitted to prove the qualifications and consent of research team members for participation in the tender, including necessary information for verifying compliance with requirements.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu_projekt (LoGo).docx -- 50.3 KB

This document is a draft work contract for a feasibility study on interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder and speech delay for the Ministry of Social Affairs, outlining general terms, scope of work, and funding.

HindamismetoodikaDOC
Hindamismetoodika_Logo.docx -- 45.1 KB

This document details the tender evaluation methodology, where the successful bid is selected based on a 70% weighting for the technical solution and 30% for the service cost, including sub-criteria for assessing the research objective.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Logopeediliste_sekkumiste_teostatavuse_uuring... -- 102.4 KB

The Ministry of Social Affairs is seeking a partner to conduct a feasibility study on interventions targeted at children with autism spectrum disorder and speech delay and their families, aiming to improve the availability and effectiveness of speech therapy services.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

78
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured and transparent, providing comprehensive documentation and clear evaluation criteria. However, a significant inconsistency regarding the procurement procedure type and the allowance for negotiation presents a notable legal and data consistency concern.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance60/100

The tender provides a reasonable submission deadline and utilizes the ESPD, indicating adherence to basic procedural requirements. However, the explicit mention of 'Procedure: A' (typically an Open Procedure) alongside 'Negotiation Allowed' is a significant contradiction, as open procedures generally do not permit negotiation. This raises concerns about the correct classification and compliance with standard procurement regulations.

•Contradiction between 'Procedure: A' (Open Procedure) and 'Negotiation Allowed'.
Clarity80/100

The tender's description of the feasibility study is clear, and the evaluation criteria (70% technical, 30% cost) are well-defined. Requirements for eligibility, technical capability, and submission are adequately documented. The procedural ambiguity, however, slightly detracts from overall clarity.

•Ambiguity regarding the exact procurement procedure type due to conflicting characteristics.
Completeness90/100

The tender is highly complete, featuring all essential basic information, specified financial details, clear timelines, and a comprehensive set of 11 attached documents. All requirements and evaluation criteria are defined, and location information is provided.

Fairness90/100

The tender demonstrates high fairness with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable preparation time, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria. The use of e-procurement ensures equal access, and there are no indications of requirements being tailored to a specific company.

Practicality90/100

The tender is highly practical, supporting electronic submission via a specified e-procurement portal. The contract start date and duration are clearly indicated, and financing information is readily available, facilitating bidder participation.

Data Consistency65/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. However, the fundamental inconsistency between the declared 'Procedure: A' (Open) and the characteristic 'Negotiation Allowed' represents a significant data contradiction regarding the procurement process itself.

•Inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' and 'Negotiation Allowed'.
Sustainability60/100

The tender explicitly identifies as 'Green Procurement' and requires environmentally friendly solutions, which is positive. It is also EU Funded, often implying higher standards. While the subject matter has inherent social benefits, explicit social criteria for the contractor's operations or an explicit innovation focus in evaluation are not detailed.

•Lack of explicit social criteria for the contractor's operations.
•No explicit innovation focus in evaluation criteria.

Strengths

Comprehensive documentation and clear evaluation criteria.
High transparency with disclosed value and e-procurement.
Clear description of the service and project scope.
Explicitly includes green procurement aspects and is EU funded.
Reasonable submission deadline for bidders.

Concerns

Contradiction between 'Open Procedure' and 'Negotiation Allowed' in legal compliance.
Significant data inconsistency regarding the procurement procedure type.
Lack of explicit social criteria for the contractor's operations.
No explicit innovation focus in the evaluation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Clarify and correctly classify the procurement procedure type to resolve the contradiction between 'Open Procedure' and 'Negotiation Allowed'.
2. Consider incorporating explicit social criteria for contractors, such as promoting employment of disadvantaged groups.
3. If innovation is desired, include specific evaluation criteria to encourage innovative approaches from bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes