Want tender expert help? See our tender preparation service
Tenders

Compact Unmanned Aircraft Systems with Spare Parts and Maintenance

Closed

Updated October 12, 2026

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 25, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
299464
Value
€2,500,000
Location
Estonia
Published
January 26, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 18, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 25, 2026

Tender Opening

February 25, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →

Key facts

Estimated value
€2,500,000
Deadline
Expired
CPV Code
35613000-4 — Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Budget
€2,500,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
70
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€806,018
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
92%
384 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority wishes to conclude a framework agreement for the purchase of compact unmanned aircraft systems and their spare parts, and for the ordering of maintenance services for up to 48 months with up to 3 framework agreement partners.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender seeks a 48-month framework agreement for compact UAV kits, spare parts, and maintenance. Success hinges on demonstrating comprehensive technical capability, competitive pricing, and robust compliance, particularly given the lack of specified evaluation criteria which implies a strong emphasis on meeting all mandatory requirements and offering the best value.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable, end-to-end UAV solutions provider with proven maintenance and spare parts support.

Cost-effective and compliant framework agreement partner for the Estonian Police and Border Guard Board.

Commitment to long-term partnership and operational continuity for critical UAV assets.

Key Opportunities
The absence of specified evaluation criteria suggests a strong emphasis on meeting all mandatory requirements and offering the most competitive overall package, likely weighted towards price.
The opportunity to be one of up to three framework agreement partners allows for a focus on securing a position even if not the absolute lowest price, provided other aspects are strong.
The 48-month duration indicates a need for long-term reliability and a stable supply chain, which can be leveraged as a differentiator.
Key Challenges
The lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize the bid beyond meeting mandatory requirements and offering competitive pricing.

Focus on a comprehensive, compliant bid that clearly articulates value across all stated requirements. Ensure pricing is aggressive but sustainable for a 48-month contract. Highlight any implicit value beyond price, such as superior service levels or risk mitigation.

Access to crucial technical specifications is contingent on submitting a signed confidentiality declaration, which must be done promptly.

Prioritize obtaining and signing the confidentiality declaration immediately upon identifying interest in the tender. Allocate resources to thoroughly analyze the technical specifications as soon as they are available.

The requirement for compliance with EU sanctions for all subcontractors and suppliers necessitates thorough due diligence.

Develop a robust process for vetting all potential subcontractors and suppliers for EU sanctions compliance. Maintain clear documentation of this vetting process.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established supplier of compact UAV systems with a proven track record in providing comprehensive support, including spare parts and maintenance services. The ideal bidder will have a strong understanding of public procurement regulations, a well-defined cost structure, and the capacity to manage a 48-month framework agreement with up to three partners.
Key Requirements
Submission of a signed confidentiality declaration to access technical specifications.
Bid must cover the entire scope of procurement (UAV kits, spare parts, maintenance).
Compliance with EU sanctions for all subcontractors and suppliers.
Agreement to the terms and conditions of the draft framework agreement.
Submission of a total cost for the bid as an evaluation criterion.
Electronic confirmation of contracting authority's requirements and conditions via ESPD.
Technical capability to supply compact UAV kits, spare parts, and perform maintenance/repair.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience in providing integrated UAV solutions including hardware, software, and comprehensive lifecycle support (maintenance, repair, spare parts) specifically for law enforcement or border security agencies.
Proactive approach to supply chain resilience and risk management for critical components and services over a 48-month period.
A clear and compelling value proposition that goes beyond just price, emphasizing operational efficiency, reliability, and long-term cost savings for the contracting authority.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, consider a commitment to local employment or training opportunities within Estonia related to UAV maintenance and operation, framing it as a contribution to national capability development.
Bid Focus Areas
Total CostN/A (implied high)

Develop a highly competitive and sustainable pricing model. Conduct thorough cost analysis of UAV kits, spare parts, and maintenance services. Consider volume discounts or long-term commitment incentives. Ensure all indirect costs are accounted for to avoid underbidding.

Technical CapabilityN/A (implied high)

Thoroughly address all technical requirements outlined in the specifications once available. Provide detailed evidence of capability, including product certifications, performance data, and case studies. Highlight the 'compact' nature of the UAVs and their suitability for the contracting authority's specific operational needs.

ComplianceN/A (critical)

Meticulously ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and submission requirements are met. Pay close attention to the ESPD, confidentiality declaration, and EU sanctions compliance. Any deviation will lead to exclusion.

Recommendations7
Immediate Confidentiality Declaration Submission
CriticalLow effort

Prioritize and immediately submit the signed confidentiality declaration to gain access to the technical specifications. This is a prerequisite for bid submission and understanding the full scope.

Enables access to critical tender documents and allows for informed bid development.
Comprehensive Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Given that total cost is an evaluation criterion and other criteria are unspecified, develop a highly competitive yet sustainable pricing strategy. This includes accurate costing of kits, spare parts, and maintenance over 48 months, considering potential volume and long-term partnership benefits.

Maximizes scoring on the primary evaluation criterion and enhances overall bid attractiveness.
Full Scope Coverage Assurance
CriticalMed effort

Explicitly confirm in the bid that the proposal covers the entire procurement scope: compact UAV kits, spare parts, and maintenance services for the full 48-month duration. Provide evidence of capability for all three components.

Avoids exclusion due to non-compliance with the 'no parts' rule.
Demonstrate Lifecycle Support Expertise
HighMed effort

Highlight proven experience in providing end-to-end lifecycle support for UAVs, including rapid spare parts delivery and efficient maintenance/repair services. Showcase a robust supply chain and service network capable of supporting a 48-month framework agreement.

Positions the bidder as a reliable, long-term partner beyond just product supply.
EU Sanctions Compliance Verification
CriticalMed effort

Implement a rigorous process to verify EU sanctions compliance for all direct and indirect subcontractors and suppliers. Maintain clear documentation of this due diligence to satisfy the contracting authority's requirement.

Prevents exclusion due to non-compliance and demonstrates robust risk management.
Thorough ESPD Completion
MediumMed effort

Ensure the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) is completed accurately and comprehensively, electronically confirming all contracting authority requirements and conditions. Pay close attention to any specific instructions provided in 'Hankepass täiendavate selgitustega'.

Ensures compliance with submission requirements and avoids administrative disqualification.
Propose Local Capability Development
LowMed effort

Although social aspects are not explicitly required, consider proposing a commitment to local training or skill development in Estonia related to UAV maintenance or operation. Frame this as enhancing national operational capacity.

Adds potential value and positive perception, even if not a formal evaluation criterion.
Competitive Positioning
Position as a trusted, long-term partner offering a complete, reliable, and cost-effective UAV solution. Emphasize operational continuity and risk mitigation for the Police and Border Guard Board over the 48-month contract period. Highlight any unique technical capabilities or service advantages that directly address the likely operational needs of the contracting authority, even if not explicitly detailed in the tender.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The bid must be submitted by 2026-02-25 at 12:00:00.
--The bidder must submit a signed confidentiality declaration to gain access to tender documents and submit a bid.
--Bidders must electronically confirm the contracting authority's requirements and conditions described in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--An undertaking that has not submitted to the contracting authority a signed confidentiality declaration agreeing to the terms of the confidentiality agreement, as required in the procurement, will be excluded from the procurement procedure.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bid must cover the entire scope of the procurement, as the contracting authority does not divide the procurement into parts.
--The bidder must ensure compliance with EU sanctions for all subcontractors and suppliers.
--Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bidder must be capable of supplying compact unmanned aerial vehicle kits according to the contracting authority's requirements.
--The bidder must be capable of supplying spare parts for unmanned aerial vehicle kits according to the contracting authority's requirements.
--The bidder must be capable of performing maintenance and repair work for unmanned aerial vehicle kits according to the contracting authority's requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bidder must submit a total cost for the bid, which will be used as an evaluation criterion.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
299464_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 12.3 KB

This document outlines tender compliance conditions, including adherence to EU sanctions regarding subcontractors and suppliers, requirements for joint bidders' power of attorney, and procedures for declaring and justifying business secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
299464_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.3 KB

This document outlines the evaluation methodology for the total cost of compact unmanned aerial vehicle sets, spare parts, and maintenance, where the lowest price will receive the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
299464_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 67.7 KB

This document is an informational European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the contracting authority's requirements and conditions for the procurement of compact unmanned aerial vehicle kits, spare parts, and maintenance, which bidders must declare electronically.

LisateavePDF
Hankemeneltuse läbiviimise lisateave.pdf -- 598.3 KB

This document provides additional information on the restricted procurement procedure, emphasizing the need to submit a confidentiality declaration to receive technical specifications and submit a bid, along with requirements for the procurement passport and joint applicant authorization.

KonfidentsiaalsusdeklaratsioonDOC
Konfidentsiaalsusdeklaratsioon.docx -- 19.7 KB

Bidders must sign this confidentiality declaration to gain access to tender documents and commit to keeping all received information confidential.

Raamlepingu projektPDF
Raamlepingu projekt.pdf -- 530.2 KB

This document is a draft framework agreement for the public procurement "Compact unmanned aerial vehicle kits with spare parts and maintenance," outlining the terms for acquiring UAV kits, spare parts, and performing maintenance and repair services.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear requirements and strong data consistency, but the mandatory confidentiality declaration for accessing technical specifications raises significant concerns regarding fairness and initial completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, clearly defining the procedure type, assigning appropriate CPV codes, and providing explicit legal justification (RHS and ECJ case law) for the mandatory exclusion ground related to the confidentiality declaration. However, the requirement for a confidentiality declaration before accessing technical specifications, while legally defended, presents a procedural hurdle that could be seen as restrictive.

•Requirement for confidentiality declaration before accessing technical specifications, potentially limiting transparency.
Clarity80/100

The tender's description is clear and unambiguous. Requirements are well-documented and understandable, categorized effectively by the AI extraction. Evaluation criteria, specifically the lowest price receiving maximum score, are clearly stated, and performance conditions are outlined in the draft contract.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, and location, is comprehensively provided. However, the technical specifications, a crucial component for bid preparation, are not immediately accessible without first submitting a signed confidentiality declaration, which impacts the initial completeness of publicly available tender documents.

•Technical specifications are not immediately available without a prior confidentiality declaration.
Fairness55/100

The requirement for a signed confidentiality declaration to gain access to technical specifications creates a significant barrier to full and equal information access for all potential bidders. This could be perceived as limiting competition or favoring entities with prior knowledge, thus impacting the overall fairness of the procurement process. While the value is disclosed and e-procurement is enabled, this specific access restriction is a major concern.

•Requirement for a signed confidentiality declaration to access technical specifications limits fair access and competition.
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, which enhances practicality. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the additional step of requiring a separate, signed confidentiality declaration to access key tender documents adds a practical hurdle for bidders, potentially making the initial engagement process less streamlined.

•Requirement for a separate, signed confidentiality declaration for document access adds a practical hurdle.
Data Consistency90/100

All key data fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent across the timeline, indicating a high level of data integrity and reliability within the provided information.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is identified as EU-funded, which often implies adherence to higher standards. However, there is no explicit mention of specific green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus within the provided information, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals.

•Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
•Absence of specific social aspects.

Strengths

Clear definition of procedure type and CPV codes.
Detailed financial and timeline information provided.
Explicit legal justification for specific requirements (confidentiality declaration).
Support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
High data consistency across all populated fields.

Concerns

Mandatory confidentiality declaration required to access technical specifications, limiting fair access.
Technical specifications are not immediately available, impacting initial completeness.
Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation procurement criteria.
The additional step of a signed declaration adds a practical hurdle for bidders.

Recommendations

1. Reconsider the timing of the confidentiality declaration requirement to allow full access to technical specifications upfront, or provide a more detailed public justification for its necessity at this stage.
2. Integrate specific green, social, or innovation criteria into the tender to align with modern procurement best practices, especially for an EU-funded project.
3. Ensure all evaluation criteria are fully transparent and accessible from the outset, not just the price component, to enhance clarity and fairness.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes